Abstract
Progress in design methodology will be restricted, or proceed in inappropriate directions, if studies of designer behaviour are limited to studies of novice or average-ability designers. We have studied two outstanding expert designers and are able to draw some parallels between their design strategies. We note that they both take a systemic view of the design situation, choose to frame their view of the problem in a challenging way, and draw upon first principles to guide both their overall concept and detailed design. Our observations are in line with those of studies of expert performance in other creative fields.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Lawson B. 1994: Design in Mind. Butterworth Architecture Press, Oxford.
Cross N., Clayburn Cross A. 1996: Winning by Design: The Methods of Gordon Murray, Racing Car Designer. Design Studies 17, 91–107.
Cross N., Christiaans H., Dorst K. (eds) 1996: Analysing Design Activity. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
Ericsson K A., Smith J. (eds) 1991: Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Holyoak K. J. 1991: Symbolic Connectionism: Toward Third-generation Theories of Expertise. In: K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (eds): Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cross, N., Cross, A.C. (1998). Expert Designers. In: Frankenberger, E., Birkhofer, H., Badke-Schaub, P. (eds) Designers. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1268-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1268-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1270-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1268-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive