Skip to main content

A Framework for Instrumenting Design Teams

  • Conference paper
Designers

Abstract

A research programme based on the pedagogic concept of Product Based Learning (PBL) is described. The similarity of this kind of learning to design learning provides an opportunity to observe design teams at work and to develop an instrumentation model to monitor their performance. Examples of some of the metrics developed are presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Leifer L.J. 1997: Design Team Performance: Metrics and the impact of Technology, forthcoming. In: S.M. Brown & C. Seidner (eds) Evaluating Organizational Training. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moll L. (ed.) 1990: Vygotsky and Education. Cambridge Univ. Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harb J., Durrant S., Terry R. 1993: Use of the Kolb Learning Cycle and the 4MAT System in Engineering Education. ASEE Journal of Engineering Education 3, 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bridges E.M., Hallinger P. 1995: Problem Based Learning: In Leadership Development. ERIC Clearinghouse on Education Management, Eugene, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leifer L.J. 1995: Global Product Development Teams. A 9 minute video focusing on the content deliverables of ME210. Anne Flatte (Producer), Stanford Center for Professional Development, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leifer L.J. 1996: An Experience in Product Based Learning. A 52 minutes video tracing the experience of four teams in ME210. Anne Flatte (Producer), Stanford Center for Professional Development, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duffy A.H.B., O’Donnell F.J. 1998: This volume, pp. 269–283.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frankenberger E., Badke-Schaub P. 1998: This volume, pp. 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Briggs-Myers I., McCaulley M.H. 1985: Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, 2nd edn. Consulting Psychologists’ Press, Palo Alto, California.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wilde D.J. 1993: Changes among ASEE Creativity Workshop Participants. Journal of Engineering Education 82, 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilde D.J. 1993: Mathematical Resolution of MBTI Data into Personality Type Components. In: Proceedings of the ASME Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, pp. 37–43, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wilde D.J., Berberet J. 1995: A Jungian Theory for Constructing Creative Design Teams. In: Proceedings of the ASME Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, pp. 525–530, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Günther J., Ehrlenspiel K. 1998: This volume, pp. 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilde D.J. 1997: Using Student Preferences to Guide Design Team Composition. In: Proceedings of the ASME Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, DTM- 3890, Sacramento, California.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hong J., Leifer L. 1995: Using the WWW to Support Project-Team Formation. In: Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference on Engineering Education for the 21st Century, Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baya V., Gevins J., Baudin C, Mabogunje A., Toye G., Leifer L. 1992: An Experimental Study of Design Information Reuse. In: Proceedings of the ASME Conference on Design Theory and Methodology pp. 141–147. Scottsdale, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mabogunje A. 1997: Measuring Mechanical Design Process Performance: A Question Based Approach. PhD thesis, Stanford University, California.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. 1995: The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dörner D. 1998: This volume, pp. 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leifer, L., Mabogunje, A. (1998). A Framework for Instrumenting Design Teams. In: Frankenberger, E., Birkhofer, H., Badke-Schaub, P. (eds) Designers. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1268-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1268-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1270-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1268-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics