Skip to main content

Perceptions of Final Year Project Outcomes

  • Conference paper
Projects in the Computing Curriculum
  • 63 Accesses

Abstract

Students highly value the experience of a good final year design and implementation project. The definition of a good project is by no means trivial but can be crucial to success. A student learns both by managing the process and delivering a product. An ideal project will succeed in both but there can be many obstacles to complete success.

A survey of students shows a variety of well defined expectations. Often these expectations concern the learning process and are independent of the final technical outcome. Supervisors often have a stronger expectation of technical success as a proof of competence but make greater allowance when failure to deliver is for legitimate reasons.

Clear definition of expected project outcome both in terms of learning objectives and project deliverables will maximise the likelihood of a satisfactory outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Peter J. Denning, Educating a New Engineer, Communications of the A.C.M. Vol 35 No 12, December 1992, pp 82–97.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Engineering Council: Standards and Routes to Registration (SAR-TOR), 2nd Edition 1990 and 3rd Edition 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Manmahesh Kantipudi et al, Software Engineering Course Projects: Failures and recommendations, in C Sledge (Ed.), Software Engineering Education, LNCS vol 640, Springer-Verlag 1992, pp 324–338.

    Google Scholar 

  4. University of Manchester Department of Computer Science: Third Year Single Honours Project Laboratory (CS3900) 1997/8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Melody Moore and Colin Potts, Learning by Doing: Goals and Experiences of Two Software Engineering Courses, in Jorge L. Díaz-Herrera (Ed.), Software Engineering Education, LNCS vol 750, Springer-Verlag 1999, pp151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Melody Moore and Terence Brennan, Process Improvement in the Classroom, in Rosalind L. Ibrahim(Ed.), Software Engineering Education, LNCS vol 895, Springer-Verlag 1995, pp 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Capon, P. (1998). Perceptions of Final Year Project Outcomes. In: Holcombe, M., Stratton, A., Fincher, S., Griffiths, G. (eds) Projects in the Computing Curriculum. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1261-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1261-7_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-010-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1261-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics