Skip to main content

Practical Assessment of Neural Network Applications

  • Conference paper
Safe Comp 97

Abstract

This paper reports the initial results of a joint research project carried out by Aston University and Lloyd’s Register to develop a practical method of assessing neural network applications. A set of assessment guidelines for neural network applications were developed and tested on two applications. These case studies showed that it is practical to assess neural networks in a statistical pattern recognition framework. However there is need for more standardisation in neural network technology and a wider takeup of good development practice amongst the neural network community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C.M. Bishop. Novelty detection and neural network validation. IEE Proc Vis. Image Signal Process., 141:217–222, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C.M. Bishop. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.M. Bishop, C. Qazaz, C.K.I. Williams, and H. Zhu. On the relationship between bayesian error bars and the input data density. In J^th IEE Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, pages 160–165, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. DTI. Best Practice Guidelines for Neural Computing Applications, 1994. [5] MISRA Report 4. Software in Control Systems, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. MISRA Report 4. Software in Control Systems, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Morgan and J. Austin. Safety critical neural networks. In 4th IEE Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, pages 212–217. IEE, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Pardey, S. Roberts, L. Tarassenko, and J. Stradling. A new approach to the analysis of the human sleep/wakefulness continuum. J. Sleep Res., 5:201–210, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Partridge and W.B. Yates. Engineering reliable neural networks. In 4th IEE Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, pages 352–357. IEE, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Stepney. High Integrity Compilation: A Case Study. Prentice Hall, 1993.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nabney, I.T., Paven, M.J.S., Eldridge, R.C., Lee, C. (1997). Practical Assessment of Neural Network Applications. In: Daniel, P. (eds) Safe Comp 97. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0997-6_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0997-6_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76191-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0997-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics