Skip to main content

Multifractal Analysis of Dipmeter Well Logs for Description of Geological Lithofacies

  • Conference paper
Fractals in Engineering
  • 351 Accesses

Summary

We use multifractal analysis as a geostatistical tool for characterization of microresistivity signals produced by dipmeter well-logging tools. The signal is divided into windows of fixed length. For each window, several texture indices characterizing the irregularity of the microresistivity signal are calculated. Plotted as a function of depths, these texture indices form what we call texture logs. We show that these texture logs can be used to distinguish geological lithofacies differing in their degree of heterogeneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Schlumberger (1986): Formation MicroScanner Service. Publ. no. M89100.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schlumberger (1983): Strategraphic High Resolution Dipmeter Tools. Publ. no. M86300.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schlumberger (1974): Log Interpretation, vol. II - Applications. N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hewett, T.A. (1986): Fractal distributions of reservoir heterogeneity and their influence on fluid transport. SPE 15385, 61st Annual Technical Conference, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Muller, J., Bokn, I., McCauley, J.L. (1992): Ann. Geophysicae 10, 735.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Halsey, T.C., Jensen, M.H., Kadanoff, L.P., Procaccia, I., Shraiman, B.I. (1986). Physical Review A, 33, 1141.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Saucier, A., Huseby, O.K., Muller, J. (1995): Quantification and modelling of reservoir heterogeneities based on multifractal scaling. Technical report IFE/KR/F-95/047, Institutt for energiteknikk, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Press, H. W., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. (1986): Numerical Recipes, the Art of Scientific Computing, pp. 495, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Evertsz, C.J.G., Mandelbrot, B.B. (1992): Multifractal measures, appendix B. In Chaos and Fractals, edited by H.O. Peitgen, H. Jürgens and D. Saupe, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schertzer, D., Lovejoy, S. (1987). J. Geophys. Res. D 92, 9693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jaffard, S.: Multifractal formalism for functions. To appear in SIAM Journal of Math. An.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lévy Véhel, J. (1995): Fractal Approaches in Signal Processing. Fractals 3, 755.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saucier, A., Huseby, O.K., Muller, J. (1997). Multifractal Analysis of Dipmeter Well Logs for Description of Geological Lithofacies. In: Lévy Véhel, J., Lutton, E., Tricot, C. (eds) Fractals in Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0995-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0995-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1253-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0995-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics