SIGAV, the Italian High Speed Railway Integrated Management System: Safety and Reliability Overview
The possibility of controlling the operation of a wide high speed railway network by a centralised management system, allows to optimise its performance in terms of traffic control and regulation, logistic support management, services provided to the user and integration with the conventional railway and external services. In the specification and design of such a system, safety and reliability cover a fundamental role in that its integrity heavily impact the railway operation. This paper aims at discussing the reliability and safety implications taken into account by the SIGAV, the Italian High Speed Railway Integrated Management System, design group in the SIGAV preliminary design and specification.
KeywordsLife Cycle Cost High Speed Railway Master Operator Availability Requirement Railway Operation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.MIL-HDBK-338–1 A, Electronic Reliability Design Handbook, Vol. 1, U.S. Department of Defence, Washington, 1991Google Scholar
- 2.prEN50128, Railway Applications: Software for Railway Control and Protection Systems, CENELEC TC9X SC9XA, Draft, November 1995.Google Scholar
- 6.Capasso A., Rapone M., Lamedica R. et al., Valutazione previsionale dei guasti del sistema di alimentazione di una linea ferroviaria per Alta Velocità sull’affidabilità del servizio, 1 Convegno Nazionale PFT2, 1993, Rome, Italy, Proceedings Vol. 1, 369–392.Google Scholar
- 7.Firpo P., Savio S., and Sciutto G., Fail Safe Digital Systems in Railway Applications: a Comparative Analysis, WCRR ’94 Conference, 1994, Paris, France, Proceedings, 1281–1284Google Scholar
- 8.MIL-STD-882-C, System Safety Program Requirements, U.S. Department of Defence, Washington, 1993Google Scholar
- 9.MIL-STD-785-B, Reliability Program for Systems and Equipment Development and Production, U.S. Department of Defence, Washington, 1980Google Scholar
- 10.MIL-STD-470-B, Maintainability Program for Systems and Equipment, U.S. Department of Defence, Washington, 1980Google Scholar