Skip to main content

Is it Reasonable to Apply the Term Responsible to Non-Human Entities?

  • Chapter
The Responsible Software Engineer

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the prudential arguments for assigning responsibility in safety-critical applications to the systems themselves (rather than to their human own­ers, programmers or users), examines the beneficial consequences of this assignation, and defends its legal and philosophical propriety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Myers, C., Hall, T., Pitt, D. (1997). Is it Reasonable to Apply the Term Responsible to Non-Human Entities?. In: Myers, C., Hall, T., Pitt, D. (eds) The Responsible Software Engineer. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0923-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0923-5_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76041-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0923-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics