Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abrams, R. A., Meyer, D. E. and Kornblum, S. (1990). ‘Eye-Hand Coordination: Oculomotor Control in Rapid Aimed Limb Movements.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(2), pp. 248–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abruzzi, A. (1956). Work, Workers and Work Measurement. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akamatsu, M., MacKenzie, I. S. and Hasbroucq, T. (1995). ‘A Comparison of Tactile, Auditory, and Visual Feedback in a Pointing Task Using a Mouse-Type Device.’ Ergonomics, 38(4), pp. 816–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, A. E. (1982). ‘The Effect of Graphic Input Devices on Performance in a Cursor Positioning Task’, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 26th Annual Meeting, pp. 54–58. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. S., Sobiloff, B., White, P. and Pearson, G. (1993). ‘A Foot Operated PC Pointer Positioning Device’, in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting. Seattle, WA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andres, R. O. and Hartung, K. J. (1989). ‘Prediction of Head Movement Time Using Fitts’ Law.’ Human Factors, 31(6), pp. 703–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaut, L. Y. and Greenstein, J. S. (1986). ‘Optimizing the Touch Tablet: The Effects of Control-Display Gain and Method of Cursor Control.’ Human Factors, 28(6), pp. 717–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Associated Press (1995). ‘Sensor on Finger Replaces Joy Stick in New Video Games.’ Appeared in The Plain Dealer, September 10, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avons, S. E., Beveridge, M. C, Hickman, A. T. and Hitch, G. J. (1983). ‘Considerations on Using a Lightpen-Interactive System with Young Children.’ Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 15(1), pp. 75–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baggen, E. A. (1987). A Human Factors Evaluation of Current Touch Entry Technologies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, R. C., Selker, E. J., Rutledge, J. D. and Olyha, R. S. (1995). ‘Negative Inertia: A Dynamic Pointing Function’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 95 Conference Companion, pp. 316–317. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. A. and Greenstein, J S. (1986). ‘A Lead-Lag Compensation Approach to Display/Control Gain for Touch Tablets’, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, T. L., Custer, G. M. and Meyer, G. M. (1975). An Alternative Editing Console for the Palo Alto Research Center, Xerox Corporation. (Unpublished project report). The Design Division, Stanford University. Abstract also available as T. L. Bentley, and G.W. Meyer, ‘Design and Evaluation of a Text Editing Gonsole’. SID International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, VII, pp. 66–67,1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beringer, D. B. and Peterson, J. G. (1985). ‘Underlying Behavioral Parameters of the Operation of Touch-Input Devices: Biases, Models and Feedback.’ Human Factors, 27(4), pp. 445–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beringer, D. B. and Scott, J. (1985). ‘The Long-Range Light Pen as a Head-Based User-Computer Interface: Head-Mounted “Sights” versus Head Positioning for Computer Access by the Disabled’, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting, pp. 114–118. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernsen, N.O. (1994). ‘Foundations of Multimodal Representations: A Taxonomy of Representational Modalities.’ Interacting with Computers, 6(4), pp. 347–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, P. (1995). ‘ANSI/HFES 200 Standard Well Underway.’ SIGCHI Bulletin, 27(3), July 1995, pp. 8–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blouin, J., Teasdale, N., Bard, C. and Fleury, M. (1993). ‘Directional Control of Rapid Arm Movements: The Role of the Kinetic Visual Feedback System.’ Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(4), pp. 678–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boritz, J., Booth, K. S. and Cowan, W. B. (1991). ‘Fitts’ Law Studies of Directional Mouse Movement’, in Graphics Interface’ 91, pp. 216–233. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Man-Computer Communications Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovair, S., Kieras, D. E. and Poison (1990). ‘The Acquisition and Performance of Text Editing Skill: A Cognitive Complexity Analysis.’ Human Computer Interaction, 5(1), pp. 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, C. (1995). ‘Human and Machine Dimensions of 3D Interfaces for Virtual Environments’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 95 Conference Companion, pp. 41–42. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, W. (1983). ‘Lexical and Pragmatic Considerations of Input Structures.’ Computer Graphics, 17(1), pp. 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, W. (1990). ‘A Three-State Model of Graphical Input’, in D. Diaper (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction — Interact’ 90, pp. 449–456. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, W. and Myers, B. A. (1986). ‘A Study in Two-Handed Input’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI’ 86, pp. 321–326. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, W., Hill, R. and Rowley, P. (1985). ‘Issues and Techniques in Touch-Sensitive Tablet Input’, in Computer Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH’ 85, 19(3), pp. 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, M. D., Wood, S. D., Sukaviriya, P. N., Foley, J. D. and Kieras, D. E. (1994). ‘Automating Interface Evaluation’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 94 Conference Proceedings, pp. 232–237. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cakir, A. E., Cakir, G., Muller, T. and Unema, P. (1995). ‘The TrackPad — A Study on User Comfort and Performance’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 95 Conference Companion, pp. 97–98. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, G. L., Janson, W. P. and Arbak, C. J. (1986). ‘Use of Eye Control to Select Switches’, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting, pp. 154–158. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, S. K., English, W. K. and Burr, B. J. (1978). ‘Evaluation of Mouse, Rate-Controlled Isometric Joystick, Step Keys, and Text Keys for Text Selection on a CRT.’ Ergonomics, 21(8), pp. 601–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D. and Robertson, G. G. (1990). ‘The Design Space of Input Devices’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 90, pp. 117–124. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D. and Robertson, G. G. (1991). ‘A Morphological Analysis of the Design Space of Input Devices.’ ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 9(2), pp. 99–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, S. K., Moran, T. P. and Newell, A. (1980a). ‘Computer Text Editing: An Information Processing Analysis of a Routine Cognitive Skill.’ Cognitive Psychology, 12, pp. 32–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, S. K., Moran, T. P. and Newell, A. (1980b). ‘The Keystroke Level Model for User Performance Time with Interactive Systems.’ Communications of the ACM, 23(7), pp. 396–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, S. K., Moran, T. P. and Newell, A. (1983). The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapanis, A. and Kinkade, R. G. (1972). ‘Design of controls’, in H. P. Van Cott and R. G. Kinkade (Eds.), Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design (rev. ed., pp. 345–379). Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. R. (1992). ‘The Role of Natural Language in a Multimodal Interface’, in Proceedings of UIST’ 92, pp. 143–149. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, E. R. F. W. and Goodeve, P. J. (1983). ‘Feedback Control of Hand-Movement and Fitts’ Law.’ Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A(2), pp. 251–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. and Beale, R. (1993). Human-Computer Interaction. New York: Prentice Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Doerry, E. (1995). An Empirical Comparison of Copresent and Technologically-Mediated Interaction Based on Communicative Breakdown. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Computer and Information Science Department., University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, S. A. and Mithal, A. K. (1994). ‘The Effect of Reducing Homing Time on the Speed of a Finger-Controlled Isometric Pointing Device.’ in Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’ 94 Conference Proceedings, pp. 411–416. New York: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, S. A. and Mithal, A. K. (1993). Human Performance Evaluation of a Finger-Controlled Pointing Device. CIS TR 92-11. Department of Computer Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, 97403-1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury, C. G. (1975). ‘Application of Fitts’ Law to Foot-Pedal Design.’ Human Factors, 17, pp. 368–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eady, K. (1986). ‘Today’s International MTM Systems: Decision Criteria for their Use’, in R. L. Shell (Ed.), Work Measurement: Principles and Practices. Norcross, GA: Industrial Engineering and Management Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. (1977). ‘Cerebellar Function in the Control of Movement.’, in F. Rose (Ed.), Physiological aspects of clinical neurology, pp. 157–178. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingstad, V. S., Parng, A., Gehlen, G. R., Swierenga, S. J. and Auflick, J. (1985). An Evaluation of the Touch Tablet as a Command and Control Input Device (Tech. Report). Vermillion, SD: University of South Dakota, Department, of Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. (1985). The Utilization of Visual Feedback Information during Rapid Pointing Movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 37A(3), pp. 407–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, W. K., Englebart, D. C. and Berman, M. L. (1967). ‘Display-Selection Techniques for Text Manipulation.’ IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-8, pp. 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epps, B. W. (1986). ‘Comparison of Six Cursor Control Devices Based on Fitts’ Law Models’, in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, pp. 327–331. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epps, B. W., Snyder, H. L. and Muto, W. H. (1986). ‘Comparison of Six Cursor Devices on a Target Acquisition Task’, in 1986 SID Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 302–305. Los Angeles, CA: Society for Information Display.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, J., Mehrabanzad, S., Scheck, S., Ostroff, D. and Shneiderman, B. (1986). ‘An Experimental Comparison of a Mouse and Arrow Jump Keys for an Interactive Encyclopedia.’ International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 24(1), pp. 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M. (1954). ‘The Information Capacity of the Human Motor System in Controlling the Amplitude of Movement.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6), pp. 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M. (1964). ‘Perceptual-Motor Skill Learning’, in A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning, pp. 243–285. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M. and Peterson, J. R. (1964). ‘Information Capacity of Discrete Motor Responses.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(2), pp. 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M. and Seeger, C. M. (1953). ‘S-R Compatibility: Spatial Characteristics of Stimulus and Response Codes.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, pp. 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J. D. and van Dam A. (1982). Fundamentals of Interactive Computer Graphics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J. D., Gibbs, C., Kim, W. C. and Kovacevic, S. A (1988). ‘Knowledge-Based User Interface Management System’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’ 88 Conference Proceedings, pp. 67–72. New York: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J. D., Kim, W. C., Kovacevic, S. A. and Murray, K. (1989). ‘Defining Interfaces at a High Level of Abstraction.’ IEEE Software, 6(1), January 1989, pp. 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, G. (1972). ‘Man-Machine Dynamics’, in Van Cott and Kinkade (Eds), Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design, pp. 227–309. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, K. P. and Holzhausen, K. P. (1980). ‘Controlling Air Traffic with a Touch Sensitive Screen.’ Applied Ergonomics, 11, pp. 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W. (1986). ‘Auditory Icons: Using Sound in Computer Interfaces.’ Human-Computer Interaction, 2(2), pp. 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillan, D. J., Holden, K., Adam, S., Rudisill, M. and Magee, L. (1990). ‘How Does Fitts’ Law Fit Pointing and Dragging’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 90 Conference Proceedings, pp. 227–234. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillan, D. J., Holden, K., Adam, S., Rudisill, M. and Magee, L. (1992). ‘How Should Fitts’ Law be Applied to Human-Computer Interaction?’ Interacting with Computers, 4(3), pp. 289–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, F. A., Iavecchia, H. P., Ross, L. V., Stokes, J. M., Weiland, W. J., Weiss, D. and Zaklad, A. L. (1986). ‘Eye-Voice-Controlled Interface’, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting, pp. 322–326. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, A. D., Wolfe, S. W., Davenport, E. W. and Calder, B. D. (1982). LMDS: Lightweight Modular Display System (NOSC Tech. Report 767). San Diego, CA: Naval Ocean Systems Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, R. and Kieras, D. (1994). ‘A Validation of the GOMS Model Methodology in the Development of a Specialized, Commercial Software Application’, in Proceedings of the CHI’ 94 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 351–357. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, N. C. (1975). ‘Cursor Positioning on an Electronic Display using Light-pen, Lightgun or Keyboard for Three Basic Tasks.’ Human Factors, 17(3), pp. 289–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, E. D. (1996). ‘Virtual Pointing on a Computer Display: Non-Linear Control-Display Mappings’, in Proceedings of Graphics Interface’ 96, pp. 39–46. San Francisco: Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society and Morgan Kaufmann publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, E. D. and MacKenzie, C. L. (1996). ‘Physical versus Virtual Pointing’, in Proceedings of the CHI’ 96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 292–299. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, W. D., John, B. E. and Atwood, M. E. (1993). ‘Project Ernestine: Validating a GOMS Analysis for Predicting and Explaining Real-World Task Performance.’ Human-Computer Interaction, 8(3), pp. 237–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, J. S. and Arnaut, L. Y. (1988). ‘Input Devices’, in M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 495–519. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, R., Mutschier, H. and Voss, M. (1984). ‘Comparison of Input Devices for Correction of Typing Errors in Office Systems’, in Proceedings of the Interact 84 Conference, First IFIPS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, A. M. and Redfearn, J. W. T. (1956). ‘An Analysis of the Frequency of Finger Tremor in Healthy Subjects.’ Journal of Physiology (London) 134, pp. 600–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriman, C. W. (1985). ‘Alternatives for Cursor Control: Footmouse, Pad or View System.’ InfoWorld, 7(38), pp. 48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haunold, P. and Kuhn, W. (1994). ‘A Keystroke Level Analysis of a Graphics Application: Manual Map Digitizing’, in Proceedings of CHI’ 94 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, pp. 337–343. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, L. and Beaubaton, D. (1986). ‘Visual Correction of a Rapid Goal-Directed Response.’ Perceptual & Motor Skills, 62(1), pp. 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodes, D. and Akagi, K. (1986). ‘Study, Development and Design of a Mouse’, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting, pp. 900–904. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, E. R. (1991). ‘A Comparison of Hand and Foot Movement Times.’ Ergonomics, 34(4), pp. 398–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, E. R. (1992). ‘Fitts’ Law with Transmission Delay.’ Ergonomics, 35(1), pp. 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hottman, S. B. (1981). ‘Selection of Remotely Labeled Switch Functions During Dual Task Performance’, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25h Annual Meeting, pp. 240–242. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, R. J. K. (1983). ‘Using Formal Specifications in the Design of the User-Computer Interface.’ Communications of the ACM, 26(4), April 1983, pp. 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, R. J. K. (1985). ‘A State Transition Diagram Language for Visual Programming.’ IEEE Computer, 18(8), August 1985, pp. 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, R. J. K. (1986). ‘A Specification Language for Direct-Manipulation User Interfaces.’ ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5(4), October 1986, pp. 283–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, R. J. K., Sibert, L. E., McFarlane, D. C. and Mullen, M. P. (1994). ‘Integrality and Separability of Input Devices.’ ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1(1), pp. 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagacinski, R. J. (1989). ‘Target Acquisition: Performance Measures, Process Models, and Design Implications’, in G. R. McMillan, D. Beevis, E. Salas, M. H. Strub, R. Sutton, and L. van Breda (Eds.), Applications of Human Performance to System Design, pp. 135–149. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagacinski, R. J. and Monk, D. L. (1985). ‘Fitts’ Law in Two Dimensions with Hand and Head Movements.’ Journal of Motor Behavior, 17(1), pp. 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagacinski, R. J., Plamondon, B. D. and Miller, R. A. (1987). ‘Describing Movement Control at Two Levels of Abstraction’, in P. A. Hancock (Ed.), Human Factors Psychology, pp. 199–247. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jagacinski, R. J., Hartzeil, E. J., Ward, S. and Bishop, K. (1978). ‘Fitts’ Law as a Function of System Dynamics and Target Uncertainty.’ Journal of Motor Behavior, 10(2), pp. 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagacinski, R. J., Repperger, D. W., Moran, M. S., Ward, S. L. and Glass, B. (1980a). ‘Fitts’ Law and the Microstructure of Rapid Discrete Movements.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6(2), pp. 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagacinski, R. J., Repperger, D. W., Ward, S. L. and Moran, M. S. (1980b). ‘A Test of Fitts’ Law with Moving Targets.’ Human Factors, 22(2), pp. 225–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jellinek, H. D. and Card, S. K. (1990). ‘Powermice and User Performance’, in J. C. Chew and J. Whiteside (Ed), Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 90, pp. 213–220. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, W. L. and Karr, A. C. (1954). ‘The Use of a Joy-Stick in Making Settings on a Simulated Scope Face.’ Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, pp. 457–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, B. E. (1988). Contributions to Engineering Models of Human-Computer Interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, B. E. and A. H. Vera (1992). ‘A GOMS Analysis of a Graphic, Machine-Paced, Highly Interactive Task’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 92, pp. 251–258. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kabbash, P. and Buxton, W. (1995). ‘The “Prince” Technique: Fitts’ Law and Selection Using Area Cursors’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 95, pp. 273–279. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kabbash, P., Buxton, W. and Seilen, A. (1994). ‘Two-Handed Input in a Compound Task’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 94, pp. 417–423. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kabbash, P., MacKenzie, I. S. and Buxton, W. (1993). ‘Human Performance Using Computer Input Devices in the Preferred and Non-Preferred Hands.’ in Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 93, pp. 474–481. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, J. F. and Reed, W. A. (1977). ‘Data Smoothing Using Low-Pass Digital Filters.’ Review of Scientific Instruments, 48(11), pp. 1447–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantowitz, B. H. and Elvers, G. G. (1988). ‘Fitts’ Law with an Isometric Controller: Effects of Order of Control and Control-Display Gain.’ Journal of Motor Behavior, 20(1), pp. 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantowitz, B. H. and Knight, J. L. (1976). Testing Tapping Time-Sharing: Attention Demands of Movement Amplitude and Target Width. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karat, J. McDonald, J. E. and Anderson, M. (1986). ‘A Comparison of Menu Selection Techniques: Touch Panel, Mouse and Keyboard.’ International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 25(1), pp. 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawato, M. (1992). ‘Optimization and Learning in Neural Networks for Formation and Control of Coordinated Movement’, in D. E. Meyer and S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and Performance XIV, 821–849. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S. W. (1968). ‘Movement Control in Skilled Motor Performance.’ Psycho-logical Bulletin, 70(6), pp. 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S. W. (1986). ‘Motor Control’, in J. K. Boff, L. Kaufman and J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Human Perception and Performance, Vol. II, pp. 30:1–60. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S. W. and Posner, M. L (1968). ‘Processing of Visual Feedback in Rapid Movements.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, pp. 155–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, R. (1978). ‘Diving, Adaptation, and Fitts’ Law.’ Journal of Motor Behavior, 10(3), pp. 255–260.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, G. D., Hodges, F. F. and Walker, N. (1995). ‘Evaluation of the CyberGlove as a Whole-Hand Input Device.’ ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2(4), pp. 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, J. S. and Van Cott, H. P. (1972). ‘System and Human Engineering Analyses’, in Van Cott and Kinkade (Eds.), Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design. Wash. D. C: U.S. Government. Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieras, D. E (1988). ‘Towards a Practical GOMS Model Methodology for User Interface Design’, in M. Heiander (Ed.), Handhook of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 135–157. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieras, D. E. (1995). Personal communication to author Douglas via e-mail, November 8, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieras, D. E and Poison, P. G. (1985). ‘An Approach to the Formal Analysis of User Complexity.’ International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22(4), pp. 365–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieras, D. E., Wood, S. D. and Meyer, D. E. (1995). ‘Predictive Engineering Models Using the EPIC Architecture for a High-Performance Task’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 95, pp. 11–18. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kinkead, R. (1975). ‘Typing Speed, Keying Rates and Optimal Keyboard Layouts’, in Proceedings of the 19th Annual Human Factors Society Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvålseth, T. O. (1981). ‘An Experimental Paradigm for Analyzing Human Information Processing during Motor Control Tasks’, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 25, pp. 581–585. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langolf, G. D., Chaffin, D. B. and Foulke, J. A. (1976). ‘An Investigation of Fitts’ Law Using a Wide Range of Movement Amplitudes.’ Journal of Motor Behavior, 8(2), pp. 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M. L., Radwin, R. G. and Vanderheiden, G. C. (1992). ‘Gain Effects on Performance Using a Head-Controlled Computer Input Device.’ Ergonomics, 35(2), pp. 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. M and Lederman, S. J. (1986). ‘Tactual Perception’, in K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas, (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, pp. 31:1–41. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundy-Ekman, L., Ivry, R., Keele, S. and Woollacott, M. (1991). ‘Timing and Force Control Deficits in Clumsy Children.’ Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(4), pp. 367–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, C. L. and Iberall, T. (1994). The Grasping Hand. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, I. S. (1991). Letter to author Mithal.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, I.S. (1992). ‘Fitts’ Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction.’ Human-Computer Interaction, 1, pp. 91–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, I. S. and Buxton, W. (1992). ‘Extending Fitts’ Law to Two-Dimensional Tasks’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI’ 92, pp. 219–226. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, I. S., Seilen, A. and Buxton, W. (1991). ‘A Comparison of Input Devices in Elemental Pointing and Dragging Tasks’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI’ 91 Conference Proceedings. New York: ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, I. S. and Ware, C. (1993). ‘Lag as a Determinant of Human Performance in Interactive Systems’, in Proceedings of the CHI’ 93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 488–493. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinlay, J., Card, S. K. and Robertson, G. G. (1990). ‘A Semantic Analysis of the Design Space of Input Devices.’ Human-Computer Interaction, 5(2–3), pp. 145–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massie, T. H. (1993). Design of a Three Degree of Freedom Force Reflecting Haptic Interface. Unpublished SB Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department., May 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, H. B. (1992). Maynard’s Industrial Engineering Handbook, 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehr, M. H. and Mehr, E. (1972). ‘Manual Digital Positioning in 2 Axes: A Comparison of Joystick and Trackball Controls’, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 16th Annual Meeting, pp. 110–116. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E. and Smith, J. E. K. (1988). ‘Optimality in Human Motor Performance: Ideal Control of Rapid Aimed Movements.’ Psychological Review, 95(3), pp. 340–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E., Smith, J. E. K. and Wright, C. E. (1982). Models for the Speed and Accuracy of Aimed Movements. Psychological Review, 89(5), pp. 449–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E., Smith, J. E. K., Kornblum, S., Abrams, R. A. and Wright, C. E. (1990). ‘Speed-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Aimed Movements: Toward a Theory of Rapid Voluntary Action’, in M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII, pp. 173–226. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithal, A. K. (1995). Using Psychomotor Models of Movement in the Analysis and Design of Computer Pointing Devices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Computer & Information Science Department., University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithal, A. K. and Douglas, S. A. (1996). ‘Differences in Movement Microstructure of the Mouse and the Finger-Controlled Isometric Joystick’, in Proceedings of the ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 96, pp. 300–307. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, A. (1986). ‘Mode errors: A User-centred Analysis and Some Preventative Measures Using Keying-Contingent Sound.’ International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24(4), pp. 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motoyuki, A. and Soto, S. (1994). ‘A Multi-Modal Mouse with Tactile and Force Feedback.’ International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(3), pp. 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1992). Usability Engineering. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). ‘The Assessment and Analysis of Handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory.’ Neuropsychologia, 9, pp. 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. R. and Nilsen, E. (1988). ‘Analysis of the Cognition Involved in Spreadsheet Software Interaction.’ Human-Computer Interaction, 3(4), pp. 309–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. R. and Olson, G. M. (1990). ‘The Growth of Cognitive Modeling in Human-Computer Interaction Since GOMS.’ Human-Computer Interaction, 5(2 and 3), pp. 221–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, S. (1996). ‘Multimodal Interfaces for Dynamic Interactive Maps’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI’ 96 Conference Proceedings, pp. 95–102. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, G. and Weiser, M. (1986). ‘Of Moles and Men: The Design of Foot Controls for Workstations’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI’ 86 Conference Proceedings, pp. 333–339. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, G. and Weiser, M. (1988). ‘Exploratory Evaluation of a Planar Foot-Operated Cursor-Positioning Device’, in Proceedings of the CHI’ 88 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 13–18. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pew, R. W. (1966). ‘Performance of Human Operators in a Three-State Relay Control System with Velocity-Augmented Displays.’ IEEE Transactions on Human Factors, Electronics, 7, pp. 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfauth, M. and Priest, J. (1981). ‘Person-Computer Interface Using Touch Screen Devices’, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting, pp. 500–504. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poison, P. G. and Kieras, D. E. (1985). ‘A Quantitative Model of the Learning and Performance of Text Editing Knowledge’, in Proceedings of the CHI’ 85 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 207–212. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porac, C. and Coren, S. (1981). Lateral Preferences and Human Behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric Explorations of Mind. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, W. and Marken, R. (1985). ‘Control Systems Analysis of Computer Pointing Devices’, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting, pp. 119–121. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. R. (1983). Goal, Plan and Outcome Tracking in Computer Text-Editing Performance. Cognitive Science Technical Report 25. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A. (1991). Human Motor Control. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. J. and Martin, G. (1988). ‘Human-Performance Evaluation of Digitizer Pucks for Computer Input of Spatial Information.’ Human Factors, 30(2), pp. 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. and Norman, D. A. (1982). ‘Simulating a Skilled Typist: A Study of Skilled Cognitive Motor Performance.’ Cognitive Science, 6, pp. 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, J. D. and Selker, T. (1990). ‘Force-to-Motion Functions for Pointing’, in D. Diaper et al. (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT’ 90, pp. 701–706. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, J. K. (1995). ‘Haptic Rendering: Programming Touch Interaction with Virtual Objects’, in Proceedings of the ACM 1995 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznick, H., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S. and Quinn, J. T. (1979). ‘Motor-Output Variability: A Theory for the Accuracy of Rapid Motor Acts.’ Psychological Review, 86(5), pp. 415–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N. and Frank, J. S. (1978). ‘Sources of Inaccuracy in Rapid Movement’, in G. Stelmach (Ed.), Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selker, T. and Rutledge, J. D. (1991). Finger Force Precision for Computer Pointing. Technical Report #RC 17342(#76618), 10/30/91. IBM Research Division, T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seilen, A. J., Kurtenbach, G. P. and Buxton, W. A. S. (1992). ‘The Prevention of Mode Errors through Sensory Feedback.’ Human-Computer Interaction, 7(2), pp. 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherr, S. (1988). Input Devices. New York: Academic Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. (1996). ISO and ANSI Ergonomic Standards for Computer Products: A Guide to Implementation and Products. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soukoreff, R. W. and MacKenzie, I. S. (1995). ‘Generalized Fitts’ Law Model Builder.’ Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 95 Conference Companion, pp. 113–114. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stammer, R. C. and Bird, J. M. (1980). ‘Controller Evaluation of a Touch Input Air Traffic Data System: An “Indelicate” Experiment.’ Human Factors, 22, pp. 581–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, R. B. and Lee, R. G. (1989). ‘Tremor and Clonus’, in V. B. Brooks (Ed.), Handbook of Physiology: The Nervous System II. Motor Control, Part 1, pp. 325–342. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swierenga, S. J. and Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (1984). Alternative Cursor Control Devices: An Empirical Comparison Using a Tracking Task (Final Report: Task II.3). Vermillion, SD: University of South Dakota, Human Factors Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorisson, K. R., Koons, D. B. and Bolt, R. A. (1992). ‘Multi-Modal Natural Dialogue’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 92, pp. 653–654. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, D. (1995). Personal communication to author Douglas via e-mail, April 29, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Cott, H. P. and Kinkade, R. G. (Eds.), (1972). Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design (rev. ed., pp. 345–379). Washington, D. C: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venolia, D. (1993). ‘Facile 3D Direct Manipulation’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 93, pp. 31–36. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, N., Meyer, D. E. and Smelcer, J. B. (1993). ‘Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Rapid Cursor Positioning Movements with Electromechanical Mice in Human Computer Interaction.’ Human Factors, 35(3), pp. 431–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, C, Arthur, K. and Booth, K. S. (1993). ‘Fish Tank Virtual Reality’, in Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 93, pp. 37–42. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, C. and Mikaelian, H. (1987). ‘An Evaluation of an Eye Tracker as a Device for Computer Input’, in CHI + GI 1987 Conference Proceedings Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics Interface, pp. 183–188. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, A. T. (1968). The Fundamentals of Skill London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, J., Bennett, J. and Holtzblatt, K. (1988). ‘Usability Engineering: Our Experience and Evolution’, in M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 791–817. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, D., Ball, R. G. and Bird, J. M. (1983). ‘Some Comparisons of On-Display and Off-Display Touch Input Devices for Interaction with Computer Generated Displays.’ Ergonomics, 26(11), pp. 1033–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, D. A. (1987). Work Measurement. (Second edition). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpaw, J. R., McFarland, D. J., Neat, G. W. and Forneris, C. A. (1991). ‘An EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface for Cursor Control.’ Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78(3), pp. 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. S. (1899). ‘The Accuracy of Voluntary Movement.’ Psychological Review Monograph (Suppl. 3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, S. (1995). Human Performance in Six Degree of Freedom Input Control. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, S., Milgram, P. and Buxton, W. (1996). ‘The Influence of Muscle Groups on Performance of Multiple Degree-of-Freedom Input.’ Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 96, pp. 308–315. New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, T. G., Lanier, J., Blanchard, C, Bryson, S. and Harvill, Y. (1987). ‘A Hand Gesture Interface Device’, in Proceedings of the CHI + GI 1987 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics Interface, pp. 189–192. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Douglas, S.A., Mithal, A.K. (1997). Bibliography. In: The Ergonomics of Computer Pointing Devices. Advanced Perspectives in Applied Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0917-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0917-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19986-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0917-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics