A Systematic Comparison of Parallel Kinematics

  • H. K. Tönshoff
  • H. Grendel
Part of the Advanced Manufacturing book series (ADVMANUF)

Abstract

Parallel kinematics have become one of the most interesting research areas in production engineering in the last years. New systems with a different kinematics structure as conventional robots or machine tools have been designed. The axes — rotary or linear driven — are connected in a parallel way, which offers new system characteristics like improved stiffness caused by the parallel strut arrangement or higher dynamics due to the lower masses to be moved. But these structures are not really new. In the robotics they are well known for special applications and the Hexapod-structure is also used in simulators for a long time. However the investigation in parallel kinematics has become a new stimulating impact for the machine tool as well as the robotics sector in the last years.

Keywords

Welding Europe Hexa Milling Rotary Actuator 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Merlet J-P 1990 Les robots par alleles. HermesGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maxwell CJ 1965 The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell. Edited by Niven WD, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1890, reprinted by Dover 1965Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mannhein A 1894 Principles et developements de Geometrie cinematique. Paris, Gauthier VillarsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gough VE, et al. 1962 Universal tire test machine. In: Proc. 9th Intern. Automobile Technical Congress FISITA, Vol 117, ImechE, London, pp 117 - 137Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stewart D 1965-1966 A Platform with six Degrees of Freedom. In: Proc. Instn. MechEngrsParti, 180(15):371-386Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clavel R 1988 DELTA, a fast robot with parallel geometry. In: Proc. of the Int. Symposium on Industrial Robots, Lausanne, pp 91 - 100Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pierrot F, Fournier A., Dauchez P 1991 Towards a fully-parallel 6 DOF robot for high-speed applications. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf Robotics and Automation, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heisel U, Maier V, Ziegler F, Gringel M 1997 Simulator, Werkzeugmaschine, MeBzeug und Roboter - eine Bestandsaufnahme Hexapod. wt, Werkstattstechnik 87: 428 - 432Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hesselbach J, Thoben R, Pittschellis R 1996 Parallelroboter fur hohe Genauigkeiten. wt-Produktion und Management ll(12):591-595Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zirn O, Preu H-J, Hebsacker M, Honegger M 1998 Potentiale paralleler Kinematik, Steuerung und Antriebe parallelkinmatischer Werkzeugmaschinen. Werkstattstechnik 88 (l/2): 53 - 56Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Week M, Giesler M, Pritschow G, Wurst K-H 1997 Den hohen Anforderungen gerecht. Neue Maschinenkinematiken fur die HSC-Bearbeitung. Schweizer Maschinenmarkt 45: 28 - 35Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neugebauer R, Wieland F 1996 Neue Werkzeugmaschinenstrukturen. ZwF 7 (8): 363 - 366Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pritschow G, Wurst K-H 1997 Systematic Design of Hexapods and other Parallel Link Systems. Annals of the CIRP 46 (1 ): 291 - 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gosselin C, Ricard R, Nahon MA 1995 A comparison of architectures of parallel mechanisms for workspace and kinematic properties. DE-Vol. 82, Design Engineering Tech. Con. Vol 1 ASMEGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pisla D 1996 Algorithmus fur die Losung der Kinematik eines Parallelroboters vom Typ DELTA mit Schubantrieben. In: Proc. 7th Int. DAAAM Symposium, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tonshoff HK, Soehner C, Isensee G 1997 Vision-Guided Tripod Material Transport System for the Packaging Industry. Robotics & Computer- Integrated Manufacturing 13 (1): 1 - 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    GloB R 1998 Hexapod-Strukturen mit Mikrometer-Genauigkeit. Chemnitzer Parallestruktur-Seminar, Tagungsband, pp 63 - 69Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pierrot F 1998 From Hexa to HexaM. Int. Parallelkinematik-Kolloquium IPK’98, ETH Zurich, pp 75 - 84Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kochan A 1996 Parallel robots perfect propellors. Industrial Robot 23 (4): 27 - 30Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tonshoff HK, Soehner C, Ahlers H 1998 A new machine tool concept for laser machining. In: Proc. Int. Seminar on Improving machine tool performance, San Sebastian, pp 119 - 124Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hesselbach J, Frint M, Plitea N 1998 Parallestrukturen fur die Robotertechnik. Chemnitzer Parallestruktur-Seminar, Tagungsband, pp 115 - 126Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wiegand A, Hebsacker M, Honegger M 1996 Parallele Kinematik und Linearmotoren. Technische Rundschau Transfer 25Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hollingum J 1997 Hexapods to take over?. Industrial Robot 24 (6): 428 - 431Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tonshoff HK, Karpuschewski B, Lapp C, Andrae P 1998 New machine techniques for high-speed machining. In: Proc. Int. Seminar on Improving machine tool performance, San Sebastian, pp 65 - 76Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. K. Tönshoff
    • 1
  • H. Grendel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Production Engineering and Machine ToolsUniversity of HannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations