Skip to main content

Continual Prediction using LSTM with Forget Gates

  • Conference paper
Neural Nets WIRN Vietri-99

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Neural Computing ((PERSPECT.NEURAL))

Abstract

Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM,[1]) can solve many tasks not solvable by previous learning algorithms for recurrent neural networks (RNNs). We identify a weakness of LSTM networks processing continual input streams without explicitly marked sequence ends. Without resets, the internal state values may grow indefinitely and eventually cause the network to break down. Our remedy is an adaptive “forget gate” that enables an LSTM cell to learn to reset itself at appropriate times, thus releasing internal resources. We review an illustrative benchmark problem on which standard LSTM outperforms other RNN algorithms. All algorithms (including LSTM) fail to solve a continual version of that problem. LSTM with forget gates, however, easily solves it in an elegant way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, “Long short-term memory”, Neural Computation, 9(8):1735–1780, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Bengio, P. Simard, and P. Frasconi, “Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5(2): 157–166, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F. A. Gers, J. Schmidhuber, and F. Cummins, “Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM”, Tech. Rep. IDSIA-01-99, IDSIA, Lugano, CH, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. W. Smith and D. Zipser, “Learning sequential structures with the real-time recurrent learning algorithm”, International Journal of Neural Systems, 1(2): 125–131, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Cleeremans, D. Servan-Schreiber, and J. L. McClelland, “Finite-state automata and simple recurrent networks”, Neural Computation, 1:372–381, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. E. Fahlman, “The recurrent cascade-correlation learning algorithm”, in NIPS 3, R. P. Lippmann, J. E. Moody, and D. S. Touretzky, Eds. 1991, pp. 190–196, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gers, F.A., Schmidhuber, J., Cummins, F. (1999). Continual Prediction using LSTM with Forget Gates. In: Marinaro, M., Tagliaferri, R. (eds) Neural Nets WIRN Vietri-99. Perspectives in Neural Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0877-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0877-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1226-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0877-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics