Public policy as a smoking cessation tool: A framework for discussion

  • H. Selin
Conference paper

Abstract

Tobacco control often is divided into the goals of prevention, cessation and protection of non-smokers. We pay lip service to the notion that progress toward each of these goals is best achieved through a comprehensive approach comprised of policy and legislation, education and programmes. Yet differentiation of primary approaches to each goal persists. Cessation has been discussed almost exclusively outside the realm of public policy, and yet policy approaches are the most effective way of achieving broad-based reductions in tobacco use. The result is that progress in cessation has been much slower than it could and should be. If we are to make significant future gains in cessation, a broader view of the interventions that affect cessation must emerge. This paper is an attempt to stimulate discussion of new perspectives on how we help smokers quit.

Keywords

Formaldehyde Benzene Arsenic Nicotine Carbon Monoxide 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borland, R., Cappiello, M. & Hill, D. (1996) Impact of theNew Australian Health Warnings on Tobacco Products(draft), Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Human Services & HealthGoogle Scholar
  2. Ferrence, R.G., Kozlowski, L.T., Ashley, M.J., Cohen, J., Pederson,.L.L, Poland, B. & Bull, S. (1996) The meaning of ‘light’ and ‘mild’: What smokers and non-smokers believe and how they respond. Paper presented at the Second National Conference on Tobacco or Health, Ottawa, Canada, 30 October-2 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  3. Imperial Tobacco Ltd (1978)Response of the Market and of Imperial Tobacco to the Smoking and Health Environment(Exhibit AG-41 in R.J.R. MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (A.G.), 2Google Scholar
  4. Lando, H.A. & Gritz, E.R. (1996) Smoking cessation techniques.J. Am. Med. Women’s Assoc., 51, 31 - 34Google Scholar
  5. National Cancer Institute (1996)The FTC Cigarette Test Method for Determining Tar, Nicotine, and Carbon Monoxide Yields of US Cigarettes. Report of the NCI Expert Committee(Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 7), Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services,Google Scholar
  6. R.J.R.-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada(A.G.), Vol. 4, 27 September 1989, 507Google Scholar
  7. Tandemar Research Inc. (1996) Cigarette Packaging Study: The Evaluation of New Health Warning Messages., Ottawa: Health CanadaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Selin
    • 1
  1. 1.Smoking and Health Action FoundationOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations