Advertisement

BIS 2000 pp 36-59 | Cite as

Clinical Workflows — The Killer Application for Process-oriented Information Systems?

  • Peter Dadam
  • Manfred Reichert
  • Klaus Kuhn

Abstract

There is an increasing interest in changing information systems to support business processes in a more direct way. Workflow technology is a very interesting candidate to achieve this goal. Hence the important question arises, how far do we get using this technology? Is its functionality powerful enough to support a wide range of applications or is it only suitable for rather simple ones? And, if the latter is the case, are the missing functions of the “just to do” type or are more fundamental issues addressed? The paper uses the clinical domain to motivate and to elaborate the functionality needed to adequately support an advanced application environment. It shows that workflow technology is still lacking important features to serve this domain. The paper surveys the state of the art and it presents solutions for some issues based on the concepts elaborated in the ADEPT project.

Keywords

Dynamic Change Information System Temporal Constraint Graph Transformation Change Request 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van der Aalst W. Proc. Workshop on Workflow-Management: Net-based Concepts, Models, Techniques, and Tools. Lisbon, June 1998, Comp. Science Report no. 98-07, University of EindhovenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van der Aalst W. Generic Workflow Models: How to Handle Dynamic Change and Capture Management Information? Proc. CoopIS’99, Edinburgh, Sept. 1999, pp 115 – 126Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agostini A., De Michelis G. Simple Workflow Models. In: [1], June 1998, pp 146–163Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bauer T., Dadam P. A Distributed Execution Environment for Large-Scale Workflow Management Systems with Subnets and Server Migration. Proc. CoopIS’97, Kiawah Island, June 1997, pp 99–109Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bauer T., Dadam P. Efficient Distributed Control of Enterprise-Wide and Cross- Enterprise Workflows. In: [11], October 1999, pp 56–64Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Badouel E., Oliver J. Reconfigurable Nets, a Class of High Level Petri Nets Supporting Dynamic Changes. In: [1], June 1998, pp 129–145Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bogia D. Supporting Flexible, Extensible Task Descriptions In and Among Tasks. PhD Thesis, University of Urbana, Illinois, 1995Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Casati F., Ceri S., Pernici B., Pozzi G. Workflow Evolution. Data & Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 24, 1998, pp 211 – 238zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dadam P., Kuhn K., Reichert M., Beuter T., Nathe M. ADEPT: An Integrated Approach for the Development of Flexible, Reliable, Cooperative Systems in Clinical Application Environments. Proc. Gl-Jahrestagung (GISI 95), Zurich, 1995, pp 677–686Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dadam P., Reichert M., Kuhn K. Clinical Workflows - The Killer Application for Process-oriented Information Systems? Ulmer Informatik-Bericht no. 97-16, University of Ulm, November 1997Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dadam P., Reichert M. (eds) Proc. Workshop on Enterprise-Wide and Cross-Enterprise Workflow-Management, 29. Jahrestagung der GI (Informatik’99), Paderborn, Germany, Oct. 1999Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dechter R., Meiri I., Pearl J. Temporal Constraint Networks. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 49, 1991, pp 61–95Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dijkstra E. Cooperating Sequential Processes. In: Genuys F. (ed) Programming Languages. Academic Press, London, 1968Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ellis C.A., Keddara K., Rozenberg G. Dynamic Change Within Workflow Systems. Proc. COOCS’95, Milpitas, CA, 1995, pp 10–21Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hagemeyer J., Hermann T., Just-Hahn K., Striemer R. Flexibility in Workflow Management Systems. In: Likowski R. et al. (eds): Usability Engineering. Teubner, 1997, pp 179–190Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Han Y . Software Infrastructure for Configurable Workflow Systems. PhD Thesis, TU Berlin, 1997Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heinlein C., Kuhn K., Dadam P. Representation of Medical Guidelines Using an Classification-Based System. Proc. CIKM ’94, Gaithersburg USA, November 1994, pp 415–422Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jablonski S., Stein K., Teschke M. Experiences in Workflow Management for Scientific Computing. In: Proc. 8th Int’l Workshop on Database and Expert Systems, Toulouse, 1997, pp 56–61Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Joeris G. Defining Flexible Workflow Execution Behaviors. In: [11], Oct. 1999, pp 49–55Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karbe B., Ramsperger N., Weiss P. Support of Cooperative Work by Electronic Circulation Folders. SIGOIS Bulletin, vol. 11, 1990, pp 109 – 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klein M., Dellaroca C., Bernstein A. CSCW-98 Workshop: Towards Adaptive Workflow Systems (Held in conjunction with the CSCW Conf.). Seattle, WA, November 1998Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kradolfer M., Geppert A. Dynamic Workflow Schema Evolution Based on Workflow Type Versioning and Workflow Migration. In: Proc. COOPIS’99. Edinburgh, September 1999Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leape L.L. et al. The Nature of Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients. New England Journal of Medicine, 324, 1991, pp 377–384Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leymann F., Roller D. Workflow-based Applications. IBM Sys Journal, vol. 36, 1997, pp 102 – 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu C., Orlowska M., Li H. Automatic Handover in Dynamic Workflow Environments. In: Proc. Caise’98. Pisa, Italy, June 1998, pp 159 – 171Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu L., Pu C. Methodical Restructuring of Complex Workflow Activities. In: Proc. 14th Int’l Conf. On Data Engineering (ICDE’98). Orlando, Florida, February 1998, pp 342–350Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luo Z., Sheth A. et al. Defeasible Workflow, its Computation and Exception Handling. In [21], 1998Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mtiller R., Rahm E. Rule-Based Dynamic Modification of Workflows in a Medical Domain. In: Proc. Datenbanksysteme in Btiro, Technik und Wissenschaft. Freiburg, March 1999, pp 429–448Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Reichert M., Bauer T., Dadam P. Enterprise-Wide and Cross-Enterprise Workflow- Management - Challenges and Research Issues for Adaptive Workflows. In: [11], Oct. 1999, pp. 56–64Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reichert M., Dadam, P. ADEPTflex - Supporting Dynamic Changes of Workflows Without Losing Control. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, vol. 10, 1998, pp 93–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reichert M., Hensinger C., Dadam P. Supporting Adaptive Workflows in Advanced Application Environments. Proc. EDBT Workshop on Workflow Management Systems, Valencia, March 1998, pp 100–109Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weske M. Adaptive Workflows based on Flexible Assignment of Workflow Schemas and Workflow Instances. In: [11], October 1999, pp 42–48Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Workflow Management Coalition: Workflow Management Application Programming Interface (Interface 2 & 3) Specification. Document No. WFMC-TC-1009, Version 2. 0, 1998Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag London Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Dadam
    • 1
  • Manfred Reichert
    • 1
  • Klaus Kuhn
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. Databases and Information SystemsUniversity of UlmUlmGermany
  2. 2.Dept. Medical InformaticsUniversity of MarburgMarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations