Methodological and Reporting Considerations

  • D. S. Simpson
  • J. G. Truscott


Reference data have a major impact on our daily lives in many ways. Clinical measurements of various sorts are used to assess our health: are we too heavy; is our blood pressure too high; is our blood cholesterol normal? All these judgements are based on comparison of the measurement to accepted reference data sets.


Lumbar Spine Reference Data Bone Mineral Content Reference Range Ethnic Grouping 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Nilas L, Hassager C, Christiansen C (1988) Long term precision in dual photon absorptiometry in the lumbar spine in clinical settings. Bone Miner 3:305–315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    WHO study Group (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Tech Report No 843. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Advisory Group on Osteoporosis (1994) Report, Department of Health, London.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Engelke K, Gluer CC, Genant HK (1995) Factors influencing short-term precision of dual x-ray bone absorptiometry of spine and femur. Calcif Tissue Int 56:19–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Truscott JG, Oldroyd B, Simpson M et al. (1993) Variation in lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral measured by dual energy x-ray absorption: a study of 329 normal women. Br J Radiol 66:514–521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Petley GW, Cotton AM, Murrills AJ et al. (1996) Reference ranges of bone mineral density for women in Southern England: the impact of local data on the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Br J Radiol 69:655–660.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rico H, Revilla M, Hernandez ER et al. (1991) Total and regional bone mineral content in normal premenopausal women. Clin Rheumato ll0:423–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Truscott JG, Simpson D, Fordham JN. (1997) A suggested methodology for the construction of national bone densitometry reference ranges: 1372 Caucasian women from 4 UK sites. Br J Radiol 70:1245–1251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simmons A, Simpson D, O’Doherty MJ et al. (1997) The effects of standarization and reference values in patient classification for spine and femur dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis Int 7:200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    US Department of Health and Human Services, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, National Centre for Health Statistics, 6525 Belcrest Road, Hyattsville, Maryland. 20782-2003. USA. http//www.cdc.Gov/nchswww/Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al. (1995) Proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporosis Int 5:389–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Genant HK, Grampp S, Gluer CC et al. (1994) Universal standardisation for dual X-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 9:1503–1514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faulkner KG, Roberts LA, McClung MR (1996) Discrepancies in normative data between Lunar and Hologic DXA systems. Osteoporosis Int 6:432–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blake GM, Fogelman I (1997) Interpretation of bone denstiometry studies. Semin Nucl Med 27:248–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wahner HW, Fogelman I (1994) The evaluation of osteoporosis: dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in clinical practice. London, Martin Dunitz.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cooper C (1996) Rationale and clinical indications for bone-density measurements. Osteoporosis Int Suppl 2:S6–8S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fordham JN. (1996) Providing a primary care open access clinic for osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int Suppl 2:S26–S27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kanis JA, Devogelaer J-P, Gennari C (1996) Practical guide for the use of bone mineral measurements in the assessment of treatment of osteoporosis: a position paper of the European Foundation for osteoporosis and bone disease. Osteoporosis Int 6:256–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. S. Simpson
  • J. G. Truscott

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations