Towards Evidence-based Management
Although evidence-based medicine (EBM) describes a type of practice with which no-one can seriously disagree , it has also become a buzzword that irritates some doctors who see it eroding their clinical freedom. I hope to describe some of the key features of EBM as applied to fetal growth restriction and to demonstrate that the latter view is mistaken. The problem in clinical practice is mainly to do with information, and EBM is mainly concerned with dealing with information in a sensible way . Sackett  defined EBM as converting information needs into answerable questions, tracking down the best evidence to answer them, critically appraising the evidence for its validity (closeness to truth) and its usefulness (clinical applicability), applying the results in clinical practice and evaluating our performance.
KeywordsCerebral Palsy Umbilical Artery Fetal Growth Restriction Perinatal Death Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cooke IE, Sackett DL. Evidence based obstetrics and gynaecology. In: Cooke IE, Sackett DL, editors. Evidence-based obstetrics and gynaecology. Bailliere’s Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1996;10:535–49. Google Scholar
- 4.Johnson N. Development and potential of fetal pulse oximetry. Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol 1992;3:193–200.Google Scholar
- Manning FA, Morrison I, Lange IR, Harman CR, Chamberlain PF. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 12,620 referred high–risk pregnancies 1. Perinatal mortality by frequency and etiology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:343–50. Google Scholar
- 8.Tyrell S, Obaid AH, Lilford RJ. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry as a predictor of fetal hypoxia and acidosis at birth. Obstet Gynecol 1989;74:332–7.Google Scholar
- 13.Johanson R, Lindow SW, van der Eist C, Jaquire Z, van der Westhuizen S, Tucker A. A prospective randomised comparison of the effect of continuous 02 therapy and bedrest on fetuses with absent end–diastolic flow on umbilical artery Doppler waveform analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102(8):662–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.McDonough PG. “Leaky randomization”: standard practice–but is it correct? Fertil Steril 1995;64:216–17.Google Scholar
- Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Antecedents of cerebral palsy. Multivariate analysis of risk. New Engl J Med 1986;315:81–6. Google Scholar
- Sung I-K, Vohr B, Oh W. Growth and neurodevelopmental outcome of very low birth weight infants with intrauterine growth retardation: comparison with control subjects matched by birth weight and gestational age. J Paediatr 1993;123:618–24. Google Scholar
- Todd AL, Trudinger BJ, Cole MJ, Cooney GH. Adverse fetal welfare and outcome at 2 years. J Matern Fetal Investl991;l(2):101. Google Scholar
- Gaudier FL, Goldenberg RL, Nelson KG, Peralta-Carcelen M, Johnson SE DuBard MB, et al. Acid base status and subsequent neurosensory impairment in surviving 500 to 1000 gm infants Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:48–53. Google Scholar
- Griffiths R. The abilities of young children. A comprehensive system of mental measurement for the first eight years of life. High Wycombe, Bucks: The Test Agency, 1970. Google Scholar
- 33.Freedman L. Bayesian statistical methods. BMJ 1996;313:569–70.Google Scholar