Skip to main content

Quantizer Optimization:Application of Passivity in Telecommunications

  • Chapter
Model Identification and Adaptive Control

Abstract

Passivity theory is used to examine the stability of a generalized decision feedback structure which incorporates a general memoryless non-linearity. This non-linearity is considered in lieu of the nearest neighbor quantizer conventionally used for generating data estimates that are fed back. By associating error propagation recovery in a finite time with stability, we determine an optimal class of memoryless non-linearities. This class includes the saturation characteristic. Among constrained quantization rules, we also determine the optimal size of a quantizer deadband region - a problem that has been previously been raised in the literature on erasures in decision feedback equalization. These new general structures are shown theoretically to have superior error propagation suppression characteristics to the conventional decision feedback equalizer. The theoretical results are corroborated by a set of simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.A. Desoer and M. Vidyasagar, Feedback Systems: Input-Output Properties Academic Press, New York, NY, 1975.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. B.D.O. Anderson, R.R. Bitmead, C.R. Johnson Jr., P.V. Kokotovic, R.L. Kosut, I.M.Y. Mareels, L. Praly, and B.D. Riedle, Stability of Adaptive Systems: Passivity and Averaging Analysis The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.A. Kennedy, B.D.O. Anderson, and R.R. Bitmead, “Channels leading to rapid error recovery for decision feedback equalizers”IEEE Trans. Commun vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1146–1155, November 1989.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. R.A. Kennedy and C.R. Johnson Jr, “Encoder stability study for the 32kbits/s CCITT G.721 ADPCM standard based on a simplified error model”, in Proc. The Second Int. Sym. on Signal Processing and its Applic., ISSPA’90% Gold Coast Australia, August 1990, pp. 744–747.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Cantoni and P. Butler, “Stability of Decision Feedback Inverses”, IEEE Trans. Commun, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1064–1075, September 1976.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Chiani, “Introducing Erasures in Decision-Feedback Equalization to Reduce Error Propagation”, IEEE Trans. Commu, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 757–760, July 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. S.U.H. Qureshi, “Adaptive equalization”, Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 73, pp. 1349–1387, September 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R.A. Kennedy and B.D.O. Anderson, “Recovery times of decision feedback equalizers on noiseless channels”, IEEE Trans. Commun, vol. 35 no. 10, pp. 1012–1021, October 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Austin, Decision Feedback Equalization for digital communication over dis¬persive channels, MIT, MIT Res. Lab. Electron., Tech. Rep. 461, August 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.V. Eyuboglu and S.U.H. Qureshi, “Reduced-State Sequence Estimation with Set Partitioning and Decision Feedback”, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-36, no. 1, pp. 13–20, January 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Duel-Hallen and C. Heegard, “Delayed Decision Feedback Sequence Esti¬mation”, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-37, no. 5, pp. 428–436, May 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D.L. Duttweiler, J.E. Mazo, and D.G. Messerschmitt, “An upper bound on the error probability in decision feedback equalizers”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 490–497, July 1974.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. J.J. O’Reilly and A.M. de Oliveria Duarte, “Error Propagation in Decision Feedback Receivers”, IEE Proc. F. Comm., Radar and Sig. Proc., vol. 132, no. 7, pp. 561–566, December 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A.M. de Oliveria Duarte and J.J. O’Reilly, “Simplified Technique for Bounding Error Statistics for DFB Receivers”, IEE Proc. F. Comm., Radar and Sig. Proc, vol. 132, no. 7, pp. 567–575, December 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.A. Kennedy, B.D.O. Anderson, and R.R. Bitmead, “Tight bounds on the error probabilities of decision feedback equalizers”, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1022–1029, October 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kennedy, R.A., Ding, Z., Hasnie, S. (2001). Quantizer Optimization:Application of Passivity in Telecommunications. In: Goodwin, G. (eds) Model Identification and Adaptive Control. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0711-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0711-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1185-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0711-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics