Advertisement

Post-mortem Changes and Artefacts

  • G. N. Rutty
Chapter

Abstract

The interpretation of the autopsy findings derived from both the external and internal examination must be done in the context of the case. These observations, documentations, and conclusions are the fundamental skills of those whom perform medico-legal autopsies. Morgagni is quoted to have said;

Those who have dissected or inspected many bodies have at least learnt to doubt, while those who are ignorant of anatomy, and do not take the trouble to attend it, are in no doubt at all”.

Keywords

Hyoid Bone Dentine Tubule Petechial Haemorrhage Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Medicolegal Autopsy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Knight B. Forensic pathology. London: Arnold. 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moritz AR. Classical mistakes in forensic pathology. Am J Clin Pathol 1956;26:1383–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sturner WQ. Common errors in forensic pediatric pathology. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1998;19:317–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Human Tissue Act. HMSO, 1961.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brinkmann B. Harmonisation of medico-legal autopsy rules. Int J Legal Med 1999;113:1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robertson I, Mansfield R. Antemortem and postmortem bruises of the skin — their differentiation. J Forensic Med 1957;4:2–10.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burke MP, Olumbe AK, Opeskin K. Postmortem extravasation of blood potentially simulating antemortem bruising. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1998;19:46–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taylor’s principles and practice of medical jurisprudence. Mant AK, editor. 13th edn. London: Churchill Livingston, 1984; 128–55. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haglund WD, Sorg MH. Forensic taphonomy. The post mortem fate of human remains. London: CRC Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dada M, Chetty R, Nel J . Misinterpretations at autopsy examination: a review of artifacts and lesions that mimic disease or injuires. J Pathol 1996; 179 (Suppl.):49A.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee KAP. Injuries caused by animals. In: Mason JK, Purdue BN, editors. The pathology of trauma. London: Arnold, 2000,265–82.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tedeschi CG, Eckert WG, Tedeschi LG . Forensic medicine. A study in trauma and environmental hazards. Vol. 2, London: WB Saunders Company, 1977; 1061–71.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Denic N, Huyer DW, Sinai SH, Lantz PE, Smith C, Silver MM. Cockroach: the omnivorous scavenger. Potential misinterpretation of post mortem injuries. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1997;18:177–80.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harada K, Asa K, Imachi T, Yamaguchi Y, Yoshida K. Centipede inflicted postmortem injury. J Forensic Sci 1999;44:849–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Komar D, Beattie O. Postmortem insect activity may mimic perimortem sexual assual clothing patterns. J Forensic Sci 1998;43:792–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mason JK, editor. Post mortem artifacts. In: Forensic medicine. An illustrated reference. London: Chapman and Hall Medical, 1993; 39–42.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roll P, Rous F. Injuries by chicken bills: characteristic wound morphology Forensic Sci Int 1991;52:25–30.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rossi ML, Shahrom AW, Chapman RC, Vanezis P. Postmortem injuries by indoor pets. Am J Foresic Med Pathol 1994;15:105–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsokos M, Schulz F. Indoor postmortem animal interference by carnivores and rodents: report of two cases and review of the literature. Int J Legal Med 1999;112:115–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsokos M, Matschke J, Gehl A, Koops E, Puschel K. Skin and soft tissue artifacts due to postmortem damage caused by rodents. Forensic Sci Int 1999;104:47–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mirza FH, Makhdoom PA. Importance of correct interpretation of postmortem artifacts in medicolegal autopsies. J Pak Med Assoc 1998;48:49–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lawler W. Bodies recovered from water: a personal approach and consideration of difficulties. J Clin Path 1992;45:654–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mayer RG, Bigelow GS, editors. Cavity embalming. In: Embalming. History, theory and practice. 2nd edn. Stamford: Appelton and Lange, 1996;253–67.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hanzlick R. Embalming, body preperation, burial and disinterment. An overview for forensic pathologists. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1994;15:122–31.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Choi D, Carroll N, Abrahams P. Spinal cord diameters in cadaveric specimens and magnetic resonance scans, to assess embalming artefacts. Surg Radiol Anat 1996;18:133–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oxley DW. Examination of the exhumed body and embalming artifacts. Med Leg Bull 1984;33:1–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Opeskin K. An unusual injury. Med Sci Law 1992;32:58–9.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lawler W. Bodies associated with fire. J Clin Path 1993;46:886–9. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bohnert M, Rost T, Faller-Marquardt M, Rodohl D, Pollack S. Fractures of the base of the skull in charred bodies - postmortem heat injuries or signs of mechanical traumatisation? Forensic Sci Int 1997;87:55–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bell T. Anatomy, physiology and disease of the teeth. London: Stewart and Company 1829; 9–17.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Whittacker DK, Thomas VC, Thomas RIM. Post-mortem pigmentation of teeth. Brit Dent J 1976;140:100–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Clark DH, Law M. Post-mortem pink teeth. Med Sci Law 1984;24:130–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brondum N, Simonsen J. Post mortem red colouration of teeth. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1987;8:127–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ortmann C, DuChesne A. A partially mummified corpse with pink teeth and pink nails. Int J Leg Med 1998;111:35–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Walsh RM, Little JT. Photographic illustrative case. In Minerva. BMJ 1996;312:1682.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kaplan JA, Fossum RM. Patterns of facial resuscitaion injury in children. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1994;15:187–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Harm T, Rajs J. Face and neck injuries due to resuscitation versus throttling. Forensic Sci Int 1983;23:109–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Prinsloo I, Gordon I. Post-mortem dissection artefacts of the neck. Their differentiation from antemortem bruises. S Afr Med J 1951;25:358–61.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Keil W, Kondo Toshikazu, Beer G. Haemorrhages in the posterior cricoarytenoid muscles - an unspecific autopsy finding. Forensic Sci Int 1998;95:225–30.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gregersen M, Vesterby A. Iatrogenic fractures of the hyoid bone and the thyroid cartilage. A case report. Forensic Sei Int 1981;17:41–3.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gardner AN. Aspiration of food and vomit. Q J Med 1958;27:227–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mendelson CL. Aspiration of stomach contents into the lungs during obstetric anaesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1946;52:191–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Knight BH. The significance of the postmortem discovery of gastric contents in the air passages. Forensic Sci 1975;6:229–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Holden HS, Crosfill JWL. The significance of foreign bodies in alveoli of the apparently dead. J Forensic Med 1955;2:141–50.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tardieu A. A l’histoire de la mort par suffocation. Ann D’Hyd Poll et de Med Legale 1866;2:338–57.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gordon I, Mansfield RA. Subpleural, subpericardial and subendocardial haemorrhages- A study of their incidence at necroscopy and of the spontaneous development, after death, of subpericardial petechiae. J Forensic Med 1955;2:31–50.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zaini MRS, Knight B. Sub-pleural petechiae and pseudopetichiae. J Forensic Sci Soc 1982;22:141–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Edston E. Evaluation of agonal artifacts in the myocardium using a combination of histogical stains and immunohistochemistry. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1997;18:163–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    James R, Gilbert J, Byard RW. Posttraumatic diaphragmatic hernia and death-etiologic factor of putrefractive artifact? Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1999;20:66–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    McCann J, Reny D, Siebert J, Stephens BG, Wirtz S. Post mortem perianal findings in children. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1996;17(4):289–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mant AK. The significance of spermatozoa in the penile urethra at post-mortem. J Forensic Sci Soc 1962;3:125–30.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pounder DJ, Jones GR. Post-mortem redistribution — a toxicological nightmare. Forensic Sci Int 1990;45:253–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hilberg T, Rogde S, Morland J. Postmortem drug distribution — human cases related to results in experimental animals. J Forensic Sci 1999;44:3–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pounder D. Dead sober or dead drunk? May be hard to determine. BMJ 1998;316:87.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    O’Neal C.L, Poklis A. Postmortem production of ethanol and factors that influence interpretation. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1996;17:8–20.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kojima T, Okamoto I, Yashiki M, Miyazaki T, Chikasue F, Degawa K, et al. Production of carbon monoxide in cadavers. Forensic Sci Int 1986;32:67–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lokan RJ, James RA. Apparent post-mortem production of high levels of cyanide in blood. J Forensic Sci Soc 1987;27:253–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Seto Y. Stability and spontaneous production of blood cyanide during heating. J Forensic Sci 1996;41:465–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chikasue F, Yashiki M, Kojima T, Miyazaki T, Okamoto I, Ohtani M, Kodama K. Cyanide distribution in five fatal cyanide poisonings and the effect of storage conditions on cyanide concentrations in tissue. Forensic Sci Int 1988;38:173–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ballantyne B. In vitro production of cyanide in normal human blood and the influence of thiocyanate and storage temperature. Clin Toxicology 1977;11:173–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. N. Rutty

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations