Skip to main content

Aerodynamic Shape Optimisation using Evolution Strategies

  • Conference paper
Book cover Optimization in Industry

Abstract

In the recent years many successful applications of evolutionary algorithms to aerodynamic design problems have been reported. The two main problems in applying evolutionary algorithms to that field are the high computational cost of the quality evaluations and the parameterisation of the design. In order to solve these problems, it is necessary to find the best simulation methods and strategies for the optimisation in order to reduce the overall computation time. In this paper different Evolution Strategies are compared with respect to their applicability to the optimisation of gas turbine blade designs. Additionally a representation with a low number of parameters is necessary in order to reduce the time needed for the optimisation. On the other hand the representation should be as variable as possible to allow the description of a wide range of possible designs. In order to optimally solve this trade-off between compact representations and detailed descriptions an adaptive representation is proposed. This representation is compared with fixed representations with respect to the optimisation time and the quality of the final result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Obayashi, Y. Yamaguchi, and T. Nakamura, (1997) Multiobjective genetic algorithm for multidisciplinary design of transonic wing planform. Journal of Aircraft, 34 (5): 690–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J Sobieszanski-Sobieski and R. T. Haftka, (1996) Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: Survey of recent developement. In 34th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. AIAA Paper 96–0711.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Vicini and D. Quagliarella, (1998) Airfoil and wing design through hybrid optimization strategies. In 16th Applied Aerodynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1998. AIAA Paper 98–2729.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.J. Doorly,(1995) Parallel genetic algorithms for optimization in CFD. In J. Periaux and G. Winter, editors, Genetic Algorithms in Engineering and Computer Science. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. R. Jones, W. A. Crossley, and A. S. Lyrintzis, (1998) Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic optimization of airfoils via a parallel genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA-98–4811.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Olhofer, T. Arima, T. Sonoda, and B. Sendhoff, (2000) Optimisation of a stator blade used in a transonic compressor cascade with evolution strategies. In I. Parmee, editor, Adaptive Computation in Design and Manufacture (ACDM), pages 45–54. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.M. Fonseca and P.J. Fleming, (1998) Multiobjective optimization and mul¬tiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms - part II: Application example. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 28 (l): 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Ostermeier, (1994) A derandomized approach to self adaptation of evolution strategies. Evolutionary Computation, 2 (4): 369 - 380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier, (2001) Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evolutionary Computation.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Jin, M. Olhofer, and B. Sendhoff, (2001) Managing approximate mod¬els in evolutionary aerodynamic design optimization. In Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, volume 1, pages 592–599, Seoul, Ko¬rea.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Olhofer, Y. Jin, and B. Sendhoff, (2001) Adaptive encoding for aerodynamic shape optimization using evolution strategies. In Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, volume 1, pages 576–583, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Bäck, D. Fogel, and Z. Michalewicz, editors, (2000) Evolutionary Computation 1, Basic Algorithms and Operators. Institute of Physics Publishing Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier, (1996) Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: The covariance matrix adaption. In Proc. 1996 IEEE Int. Conf. on Evolutionary Computation, pages 312–317. IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Fischer, (2001) Evolutionäre Optimierung von Spline-codierten Strukturen. Master’s thesis, University Bochum, Institut für Neuroinformatik, Bochum, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Olhofer, M., Arima, T., Sonoda, T., Fischer, M., Sendhoff, B. (2002). Aerodynamic Shape Optimisation using Evolution Strategies. In: Parmee, I.C., Hajela, P. (eds) Optimization in Industry. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0675-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0675-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-534-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0675-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics