The Role of Sequential Learning in Language Evolution: Computational and Experimental Studies

  • Morten H. Christiansen
  • Rick A. C. Dale
  • Michelle R. Ellefson
  • Christopher M. Conway

Abstract

After having been plagued for centuries by unfounded speculations, the study of language evolution is now emerging as an area of legitimate scientific inquiry. Early conjectures about the origin and evolution of language suffered from a severe lack of empirical evidence to help rein in proposed theories. This led to outlandish claims such as the idea that Chinese was the original ur-language of humankind, surviving the biblical flood because of Noah and his family (Webb, 1669, cited in Aitchison, 1998). Or, the suggestion that humans have learned how to sing and speak from the birds in the same way as they would have learned how to weave from spiders (Burnett, 1773, cited in Aitchison, 1998). Given this state of the art, it was perhaps not surprising that the influential Société Linguistique de Paris in 1866 imposed a ban on papers discussing issues related to language origin and evolution, and effectively excluded such theorizing from the scientific discourse.

Keywords

Coherence Kelly Poss Metaphor Aphasia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitchison J (1998) On discontinuing the continuity-discontinuity debate. In: Hurford J, Studdert-Kennedy M, Knight C (eds) (1998) Approaches to the evolution of language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp 17–29Google Scholar
  2. Batali J (1998) Computational simulations of the emergence of grammar. In: Hurford J, Studdert-Kennedy M, Knight C (eds) (1998) Approaches to the evolution of language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp 405–426Google Scholar
  3. Burnett J (1773) The origin and process of language (vols I–IV). A Kincaid, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne RW, Russon AE (1998) Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21: 667–721Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky N (1986) Knowledge of language. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Christiansen MH (1994) Infinite languages finite minds: Connectionism learning and linguistic structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Christiansen MH (2000) Using artificial language learning to study language evolution: Exploring the emergence of word order universals. In: Dessalles JL, Ghadakpour L (eds) The Evolution of Language: 3 rd International Conference. Ecole Nationale Superieure des Telecommunications, Paris, pp 45–48Google Scholar
  8. Christiansen MH, Chater N (1999) Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance. Cognitive Science, 23: 157–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christiansen MH, Chater N (in preparation) Language as an organism: Language evolution as the adaptation of linguistic structure. Manuscript in preparationGoogle Scholar
  10. Christiansen MH, Devlin JT (1997) Recursive inconsistencies are hard to learn: A connectionist perspective on universal word order correlations. In: Proceedings of the 19 th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, pp 113–118Google Scholar
  11. Christiansen MH, Kelly L, Shillcock RC, Greenfield K (in preparation) Artificial grammar learning in agrammatism. Manuscript in preparationGoogle Scholar
  12. Cleeremans A (1993) Mechanisms of implicit learning: Connectionist models of sequence processing. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  13. Conway C, Christiansen MH (2001) Sequential learning in non-human primates. Manuscript submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
  14. Corballis MC (1992) On the evolution of language and generativity. Cognition, 44: 197–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies AM (1987) ‘Organic’ and ‘organism’ in Franz Bopp. In: Hoenigswald HM, Wiener LF (eds) Biological metaphor and cladistic classification. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia PA, pp 81–107Google Scholar
  16. Deacon TW (1997) The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. WW Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Dryer MS (1992) The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language, 68: 81–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellefson MR, Christiansen M H (2000) Subjacency constraints without universal grammar: Evidence from artificial language learning and connectionist modeling. In: The Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, pp 645–650Google Scholar
  19. Elman JL (1990) Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14: 179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Givón T (1998) On the co-evolution of language, mind and brain. Evolution of Communication, 2: 45–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gomez RL, Gerken L (2000) Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(5): 178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grossman M (1980) A central processor for hierarchically structured material: Evidence from Broca’s aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 18: 299–308MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hauser MD, Newport EL, Aslin RN (2001) Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: Statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins. Cognition, 78: 53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hawkins JA (1994) A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson-Pynn J, Fragaszy DM, Hirsh EM, Brakke KE, Greenfield PM (1999) Strategies used to combine seriated cups by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus) and capuchins (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113: 137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kellogg WN, Kellogg LA (1933) The ape and the child: A study of environmental influence on early behavior. Hafner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Kimura D (1988) Review of what the hands reveal about the brain. Language and Speech, 31:375–378Google Scholar
  28. Kiparsky P (1976) Historical linguistics and the origin of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280: 97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kirby S (1998) Fitness and the selective adaptation of language. In: Hurford J, Studdert-Kennedy M, Knight C (eds) (1998) Approaches to the evolution of language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp 359–383Google Scholar
  30. Kirby S (2000) Language evolution without natural selection: From vocabulary to syntax in a population of learners. In: Knight C, Hurford JR, Studdert-Kennedy M (eds) The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp 303–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kirby S (2001) Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure: an iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation and Cognitive Science, 5(2): 102–110MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Langacker RW (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical perspectives Vol 1. Stanford University Press, Stanford CAGoogle Scholar
  33. Livingstone D (2000) A modified-neural theory for the evolution of linguistic diversity. Paper presented at The Evolution of Language: 3 rd International Conference, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  34. Livingstone D, Fyfe C (1999) Modelling the evolution of linguistic diversity. In In: Floreano D, Nicoud JD, Mondada F (eds) Proceedings of ECAL99 the Fifth European Conference on Artificial Life (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence) Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 704–708Google Scholar
  35. Lock A, Colombo M (1996) Cognitive abilities in a comparative perspective. In: Lock A, Peters CR (eds) Handbook of human symbolic evolution. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 596–643Google Scholar
  36. Maess B, Koelsch S, Gunter TC, Friederici AD (2001) Musical syntax is processed in Broca’s area: An MEG study. Nature Neuroscience, 4: 540–545Google Scholar
  37. McMahon AMS (1994) Understanding language change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UKGoogle Scholar
  38. Morgan JL, Demuth K (eds) (1996) Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  39. Morgan JL, Meier RP, Newport EL (1987) Structural packaging in the input to language learning: Contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language. Cognitive Psychology, 19: 498–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nerlich B (1989) The evolution of the concept of ‘linguistic evolution’ in the 19th and 20th century. Lingua, 77: 101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Newmeyer F (1991) Functional explanation in linguistics and the origins of language. Language and Communication, 11: 3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nowak MA, Komarova NL, Niyogi P (2001) Evolution of universal grammar. Science, 291: 114–118MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oshiba N (1997) Memorization of serial items by Japanese monkeys a chimpanzee and humans. Japanese Psychological Research, 39: 236–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Orlov T, Yakovlev V, Hochstein S, Zohary E (2000) Macaque monkeys categorize images by their ordinal number. Nature, 404: 77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Osterhout L, Holcomb PJ (1992) Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31:785–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Patel AD, Gibson E, Ratner J, Besson M, Holcomb PJ (1998) Processing syntactic relations in language and music: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10: 717–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Patterson FG (1978) The gestures of a gorilla: Language acquisition in another pongid. Brain and Language, 5: 72–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Percival WK (1987) Biological analogy in the study of languages before the advent of comparative grammar. In Hoenigswald HM, Wiener LF (eds) Biological metaphor and cladistic classification. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia PA, pp 3–38Google Scholar
  49. Piattelli-Palmarini M (1989) Evolution selection and cognition: From “learning” to parameter setting in biology and in the study of language. Cognition, 31: 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pinker S (1994) The language instinct: How the mind creates language. William Morrow, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Pinker S, Bloom P (1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13:707–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reber AS (1993) Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Saffran JR (2000) Non-linguistic constraints on the acquisition of phrase structure. In: Gleitman LR, Joshi AK (eds) Proceedings of the 22 nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, pp 417–422Google Scholar
  54. Saffran JR (2001) The use of predictive dependencies in language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 44: 493–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saffran JR, Aslin RN, Newport EL (1996) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274: 1926–1928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Shanker SG, Taylor TJ (1998) Apes language and the human mind. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Schleicher A (1863) Die Darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft. Böhlau, WeimerGoogle Scholar
  58. Spinozzi G, Langer J (1999) Spontaneous classification in action by a human-enculturated and language-reared bonobo (Pan paniscus) and common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113: 286–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Steinhauer K, Friederici AD, Pfeifer E (2001) ERP recordings while listening to syntax errors in an artificial language: Evidence from trained and untrained subjects. Poster presented at the 14 th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Philadelphia PAGoogle Scholar
  60. Stevick RD (1963) The biological model and historical linguistics. Language, 39: 159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Swartz KB, Chen S, Terrace HS (2000) Serial learning by rhesus monkeys: II. Learning four-item lists by trial and error. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26: 274–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Van Everbroeck E (1999) Language type frequency and learnability: A connectionist appraisal. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference. Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, pp 755–760Google Scholar
  63. Webb J (1669) An historical essay endeavouring the probability that the language of the empire of china is the primitive language. LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morten H. Christiansen
  • Rick A. C. Dale
  • Michelle R. Ellefson
  • Christopher M. Conway

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations