Skip to main content

Three-dimensional Ultrasound Diagnosis of Congenital Uterine Anomalies

  • Chapter
Ultrasound and Endoscopic Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • 284 Accesses

Abstract

Congenital uterine anomalies are a range of morphological abnormalities of the uterus, which form as a result of aberrant development of the Müllerian ducts at around 8 weeks’ gestation.1 They are associated with a wide range of pregnancy problems, including miscarriage, pre-term delivery, ante-partum bleeding and intrauterine growth restriction.2 However, our knowledge of congenital uterine anomalies has been limited because of their apparent rarity and the invasive nature of diagnostic tests, which have traditionally been used to assess uterine morphology. Screening for congenital uterine anomalies has therefore been limited to women with poor reproductive histories, such as recurrent first-trimester miscarriage. The prevalence of anomalies in the general population of women, with normal reproductive histories, and their clinical significance have remained largely unknown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rock J (1997) Surgery for anomalies of the Miillerian ducts. In: Rock J, Thompson J (eds) Te Linole’s operative gynaecology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 687–731

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heinonen P, Saarikoski S, Pystynen P (1982) Reproductive performance of women with congenital uterine anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 61:157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Candiani G, Fedele L, Zamberletti D et al. (1983) Endometrial patterns in malformed uteri. Acta Eur Fertil 14:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Marchini M et al. (1996) Ultrastructural aspects of endometrium in infertile women with septate uterus. Fertil Steril 65:750–752.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dabirashafi H, Bahadori S, Mohammed K et al. (1995) Septate uterus: new idea on the histological features of the septum in this abnormal uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:105–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rock J, Murphy A (1986) Anatomic abnormalities. Clin Obstet Gynecol 29:886–911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Homer H, Li T, Cooke I (2000) The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 73:1–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Reuter K, Daly D, Cohen S (1989) Septate versus bicornuate uteri: errors in imaging diagnosis. Radiology 172:749–752

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. The American Fertility Society (1988) The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Miillerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49:944–955

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buttram V, Gibbons W (1979) Miillerian anomalies: a proposed classification (an analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril 32:40–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Woelfer B, Salim R, Banerjee S et al. (2001) Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening. Obstet Gynecol 98:1099–1103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K et al. (1995) Three- dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 5:233–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Raga F, Bonilla-Muscoles F, Blanes J et al. (1996) Congenital Miillerian anomalies: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound. Fertil Steril 65:523–528

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jurkovic D, Gruboeck K, Tailor A et al. (1997) Ultrasound screening for congenital uterine anomalies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:1320–1321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ashton D, Amin H, Richart R et al. (1988) The incidence of asymptomatic uterine anomalies in women undergoing transcervical tubal sterilisation. Obstet Gynecol 72:28–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Simon C, Martinez L, Prado F et al. (1991) Miillerian defects in women with normal reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 56:1192–1193

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J et al. (1997) Reproductive impact of congenital uterine anomalies. Hum Reprod 12:2277–2281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Acien P (1993) Reproductive performance in women with congenital uterine malformations. Hum Reprod 8:122–126

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tulandi T, Arronet G, Mclnnes R (1980) Arcuate and bicornuate uterine anomalies and infertility. Fertil Steril 34:362–364

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Salim R, Woelfer B, Regan L et al. (2001) Three-dimensional ultrasound study of congenital uterine anomalies in women with a history of recurrent miscarriage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18 (suppl 1):5

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grimbizis G, Camus M, Tarlatzis B et al. (2001) Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic results. Hum Reprod Update 7:161–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fedele L, Bianchi S (1995) Hysteroscopic metroplasty for subseptate uterus. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 22:473–489

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kirk EP, Choung CJ, Coulam CB et al. (1993) Pregnancy after metroplasty for uterine anomalies. Fertil Steril 59:1164–1168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salim, R., Jurkovic, D. (2003). Three-dimensional Ultrasound Diagnosis of Congenital Uterine Anomalies. In: Ultrasound and Endoscopic Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0655-5_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0655-5_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1170-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0655-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics