Skip to main content

Statistical Models

  • Chapter
  • 271 Accesses

Abstract

The ultrasound based characterisation of adnexal masses continues to be a challenge. A reliable, objective and reproducible method to predict malignancy in these tumours remains elusive. For the clinician such information on the probability of malignancy would be very helpful in the management of the patient. On the basis of this information, any patients deemed to have a high probability of malignancy could be selected for referral to tertiary centres for surgery to be performed by gynaecological oncologists. At the other end of the spectrum, patients with benign tumours could be operated on by minimally invasive techniques. There may be another subgroup of patients whose tumours appear so benign that the need for surgery could be questioned. In such instances, the information on the probability of malignancy could be utilised to reassure the patient and arrange the appropriate follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bast RC Jr, Feeney M, Lazarus H et al (1981) Reactivity of a monoclonal antibody with human ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Invest 68(5):1331–1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen DX, Schwartz PE, Li XG et al (1988) Evaluation of CA 125 levels in differentiating malignant from benign tumors in patients with pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol 72(l):23–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Finkler NJ, Benacerraf B, Lavin PT et al (1988) Comparison of serum CA 125, clinical impression, and ultrasound in the preoperative evaluation of ovarian masses. Obstet Gynecol 72(4):659–664

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kawai M, Kikkawa F, Ishikawa H et al (1994) Differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors by transvaginal color-pulse Doppler sonography. Gynecol Oncol 54(2):209–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bourne TH, Campbell S, Steer C et al (1989) Transvaginal colour flow imaging: a possible new screening technique for ovarian cancer. Br Med J 299:1367–1370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurjak A, Zalud I, Alfirevic Z (1991) Evaluation of adnexal masses with transvaginal color ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 10(6):295–297

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hata T, Hata K, Yamane Y et al (1988) Real-time two-dimensional and pulsed Doppler ultrasound detection of intrapelvic neoplastic tumors and abnormal pathogenic changes: preliminary report. J Cardiovasc Ultrasonography 7:135–141

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bromley B, Goodman H, Benacerraf BR (1994) Comparison between sonographic morphology and Doppler waveform for the diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. Obstet Gynecol 83 (3):434–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Valentin L, Sladkevicius P, Marsal K (1994) Limited contribution of Doppler velocimetry to the differential diagnosis of extrauterine pelvic tumours. Obstet Gynecol 83:425–433

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stein SM, Leifer-Narin S, Johnson MB et al (1995) Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography. Am J Roentgenol 164:381–386

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tailor A, Jurkovic D, Bourne TH et al (1996) A comparison of intratumoural indices of blood flow velocity and impedance for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Med Biol 22(7):837–843

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hata K, Hata T, Kitao M (1995) Intratumoral peak systolic velocity as a new possible predictor for detection of adnexal malignancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:1496–1500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sassone AM, Timor-Tritsch IE, Artner A et al (1991) Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. Obstet Gynecol 78(l):70–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lerner JP, Timor-Tritsch IE, Federman A et al (1994) Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses with an improved, weighted scoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(1 Pt 1):81–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bourne TH, Campbell S, Reynolds KM et al (1993) Screening for early familial ovarian cancer with transvaginal ultrasonography and colour blood flow imaging. Br Med J 306 (6884):1025–1029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Astion ML, Wilding P (1992) The application of back- propagation neural networks to problems in pathology and laboratory medicine. Arch Pathol Lab Med 116:995–1001

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boone JM, Gross GW, Greco-Hunt V (1990) Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis: I Introduction and illustration. Invest Radiol 25:1012–1016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. DaPonte JS, Sherman P (1991) Classification of ultrasonic image texture by statistical discriminant analysis of neutral networks. Comput Med Imaging Graph 15(l):3–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gross GW, Boone JM, Greco-Hunt V et al (1990) Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis. II Interpretation of neonatal chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 25(9):1017–1023

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Scott JA, Palmer EL (1993) Neural network analysis of ventilation-perfusion lung scans. Radiology 186(3):661–664

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Floyd CE Jr, Lo JY, Yun AJ et al (1994) Prediction of breast cancer malignancy using an artificial neural network Cancer 74(11):2944–2948

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tailor A, Jurkovic D, Bourne TH et al (1999) Sonographic prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using an artificial neural network.. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(l):21–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tailor A, Jurkovic D, Bourne TH et al (1997) Sonographic prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 10(l):41–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Timmerman D, Bourne TH, Tailor A et al (1999) A comparison of methods for preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses: the development of a new logistic regression model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181(l):57–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Timmerman D, Verreist H, Bourne T et al (1999) Artificial neural network models for the preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:17–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schutter EM, Sohn C, Kristen P et al (1998) Estimation of probability of malignancy using a logistic model combining physical examination, ultrasound, serum CA 125, and serum CA 72–4 in postmenopausal women with a pelvic mass: an international multicenter study. Gynecol Oncol 69(1):56–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Alcazar JL, Jurado M (1998) Using a logistic model to predict malignancy of adnexal masses based on menopausal status, ultrasound morphology, and color Doppler findings. Gynecol Oncol 69(2):146–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Clayton RD, Snowden S, Weston MJ et al (1999) Neural networks in the diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumours. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(10):1078–1082

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Aslam N, Tailor A, Lawton F et al (2000) Prospective evaluation of three different models for the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 107 (11):1347—1353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tailor, A. (2003). Statistical Models. In: Ultrasound and Endoscopic Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0655-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0655-5_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1170-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0655-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics