Skip to main content
  • 277 Accesses

Abstract

Abnormal uterine bleeding in general, and menorrhagia in particular, is one of the most frequent reasons for patients to consult their gynaecologist.1 The knowledge that the objective measurement of menstrual bleeding will be less than 80 ml per period (the definition of menorrhagia) in more than half of cases does not release the gynaecologist from a standardised diagnostic management.2 This is important to avoid under- treatment, such as reassurance without correct diagnosis, as well as overtreatment, which would be a hysterectomy in the absence of organic uterine pathology. Important features deciding on the clinical value of a diagnostic procedure are simplicity, safety, patient compliance, cost-benefit relationship and accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hallberg L, Högdall AM, Nilsson L et al (1966) Menstrual blood loss: a population study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 45:320–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bayer SR, De Cherney AH (1993) Clinical manifestations and treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Am Med Assoc 269:1823–1828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Campo RL, Schlösser HW (1998) Uteriner Faktor der weiblichen Sterilität/Infertilität. In: Diedrich K (ed) Endokrinologie und Reproduktionsmedizin III, ch 8: Urban & Schwarzenberg, München-Wien-Baltimore, pp 138–158

    Google Scholar 

  4. Valle RF (1981) Hystero scopic evaluation of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Surg Gynecol Obstet 153:521–526

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Neven P, De Muylder X, Van Belle Y et al (1994) Tamoxifen and the uterus: women given this drug need careful assessment. Br Med J 309:1313–1314

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Neven P, De Muylder X, Van Belle Y et al (1997) Longitudinal hysteroscopic follow-up during tamoxifen treatment (letter). Lancet 351(9095):36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagele F, Bournas N, O’Connor H et al (1996) Comparison of carbon dioxide and normal saline for uterine distension in outpatient hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 65(2):305–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark S, Vonau B, Macdonald R (1996) Topical anaesthesia in outpatient hysteroscopy. Gynaecol Endosc 5:141–144

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ezeh UO, Vercellini P (1995) Outpatient hysteroscopy - paracervical block. Fertil Steril 64:221–222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Deligdisch L (1970) Endometrial changes associated with myomata uterus. J Clin Pathol 23:676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bolck F (1961) Die Pathologie der Uterusmyome. Arch Gynecol 195:166

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hucke J, Campo R, Debruyne P et al (1992) Die hystero- skopische Resektion submuköser Myome. Geburtsh u Frau- enheilk 52:214–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brooks PG, Serden SP (1988) Hysteroscopic findings after unsuccessful dilatation and curettage for abnormal uterine bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158:1354–1357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Word B, Gravlee LC, Widemann GL (1958) The fallacy of simple uterine curettage. Obstet Gynecol 12:642–649

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cronje HS, Deale CJC (1988) Staging of endometrial cancer by hysteroscopy. S Afr Med J 73:716–717

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Joelsson I, Levine RU, Moberger G (1971) Hysteroscopy as an adjunct in determining the extent of carcinoma of the endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol lll(5):696–702

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ghimouz A, Loisel B, Kheyar M et al (1996) Carbon dioxide embolism with transient blindness associated with hysteroscopy. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 15:192–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.Tur Kaspa I, Seidman DS, Soriano D et al (1998) Hysterosalpingography with a balloon catheter versus a metal cannula: a prospective, randomized, blinded comparative study. Hum Reprod 13(l):75–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campo, R., Van Belle, Y. (2003). Role of Hysteroscopy. In: Ultrasound and Endoscopic Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0655-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0655-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1170-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0655-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics