Skip to main content

How Habermas’ Action Types Can Influence KBS Design

  • Conference paper
Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XIX

Abstract

Knowledge based systems (KBS) encapsulate human expertise in such as way that the user not only obtains expert advice but can explore the knowledge underlying it. This has allowed KBSs a variety of possible roles beyond the traditional consultancy role — such as checklist, communication, training and knowledge refinement. Each role demands different features of the KBS. So knowing in what roles a KBS may assist its users can help the designers focus on those features that are most important and avoid wasting effort on other features. These roles can be understood by means of Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action. This paper discusses how consideration of Habermas’ action types might influence the design of knowledge based systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown P. Barclaycard Fraudwatch - a KBS for detecting credit card fraud. In: Land L (ed) Knowledge Based Systems Usage. McGraw Hill, 1995, pp 147–56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Devlukia J, McMahon C, Williams JS. Rover Group: a knowledge-based approach for fatigue analysis of automotive parts. In: Land L (ed) Knowledge Based Systems Usage. McGraw Hill, 1995, pp. 125–46.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Green K. British Telecom SPOP expert system application. In: Land L (ed) Knowledge Based Systems Usage. McGraw Hill, 1995, pp. 157–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baker DM. AEA Environment and Energy: CRISIS - an expert assistant in criticality accident dosimetry in: Land 1, (ed) Knowledge Based Systems Usage. McGraw Hill, 1995, pp.79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Muggeridge L. Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland: Assessing professional expertise using expert systems. In: Land L (ed) Knowledge Based Systems Usage. McGraw Hill, 1995, pp. 173-81.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brandon P, Basden A, Hamilton I, Stockley J. Expert Systems: The Strategic Planning of Construction Projects. The RIGS/Alvey Research, Quantity Surveyors Division of The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors in collaboration with The University of Salford, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Basden A. On the application of expert systems. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1983, 19: 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Basden A, Watson ID, Brandon PS. Client Centred: An Approach to Developing Knowledge Based Systems. Council for the Central Laboratory of the Research Councils, U.K, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng P. British Sugar: Expert decision support system in production monitoring. In: Land L (ed) Knowledge Based Systems Usage. McGraw Hill, 1995, pp. 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Castell AC, Basden A, Erdos G, Barrows P, Brandon PS. Knowledge Based Systems in Use: A Case Study. In: Proc. Expert Systems 92 (Applications Stream). British Computer Society Specialist Group for knowledge based systems, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bratman MF, Israel DJ, Pollack ME. Plans and resource bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 1988, 4: 349–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirschheim R, Klein HK, Newman M. Information Systems Development as Social Action: Theoretical Perspective and Practice. Omega, 1991, 19 (6): 587–608.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume l: Reason and rationalisation in society. Thomas McCarthy (tr). Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lyytinen K. Information Systems Development as Social Action: Framework and Critical Implications. Jyvaskylan Yliopisto, Jyvaskyla, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ngwenyama KO, Lee AS. Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning. MIS Quarterly, 1997, 21 (2): 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lyytinen K, Klein HK. The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas as a Basis for a Theory of Information Systems. In: Mumford E (ed), Research Methods in Information Systems. Elsevier, B. V. ( North-Holland ), 1985, Chapter 12.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goffman E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books, New York, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kunneman H. The Truth Funnel: A Communicative Theory Perspective on Science and Society. Meppel, The Netherlands: Boom (in Dutch ), (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Habermas J., The Theory of Communicative Action, Band 1. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (in German ), 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume II: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Beacon Press, Boston, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hines JG, Basden A. Experience with the use of computers to handle corrosion knowledge. British Corrosion Journal, 1986, 21 (3): 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Winfield MJ. Multi-Aspectual Knowledge Elicitation. PhD Thesis, University of Salford, Salford, U.K., 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ngwenyama OK, Klein HK. An exploration of expertise of knowledge workers: towards a definition of the universe of discourse for knowledge acquisition. Information Systems Journal, 1994, 4: 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Attarwala FT, Basden A. A methodology for constructing Expert Systems. R&D Management, 1985, 15 (2): 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Basden A. Some technical and non-technical issues in implementing a knowledge server. Software - Practice and Experience, 2000, 30: 1127–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Newell A. The Knowledge Level. Artificial Intelligence, 1982, 18: 87–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilson FA. The truth is out there: the search for emancipatory principles in information systems design. Information Technology and People, 1997, 10 (3): 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jones GO, Basden A. How Habermas’ Action Types can influence KBS design and use. European Confenence on I.T. Evaluation, ELITE, Paris, July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jones, G.O., Basden, A. (2003). How Habermas’ Action Types Can Influence KBS Design. In: Bramer, M., Preece, A., Coenen, F. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XIX. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0651-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0651-7_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-674-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0651-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics