If domain knowledge is not available in a proper form then simple search methods, such as depth first search may be used (Chapter 2).
If specific domain knowledge in the form of plans, rules, or procedures exists, such knowledge may be instantiated directly (Chapter 4).
If on the other hand general decompositions (product hierarchy) exist but no specific ones do, the general plan can be used to decompose the problem by partitioning the problem or providing islands in the search space; the solution is obtained by utilizing multiple knowledge sources (current chapter).
If no specific solution plans exist but the problem resembles one solved previously, analogical and case-based reasoning may be applied to transfer the solution of a similar past problem to the new situation (Chapter 6).
If models of systems exist and the purpose is to study the qualitative behavior of a system or aggregations of systems then qualitative reasoning techniques can be used to envision the behavior (see Chapter 7).
If existing domain knowledge is insufficient, machine learning techniques can be used to derive new knowledge (see Chapter 8, Chapter 9, Section 188.8.131.52, and ).
KeywordsData Panel Knowledge Source Test Vector Level Shift Inference Mechanism
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Balzer, R., Erman, L., London, P., and Williams, C, “HEARSAY-III: A Domain Independent Framework for Expert Systems,” Proceedings of the First NCAI, Morgan Kaurfmann Publishers, pp. 108–110, 1980.Google Scholar
- 2.Carbonell, J. G., “Derivational Analogy: A Theory of Reconstructive Problem Solving and Expertise Acquisition,” Machine Learning, Vol. 2, Michalski, R. S., Carbonell, J. G., Mitchell, T. M. (Editors), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc, Los Altos, California, 1986.Google Scholar
- 3.Case, M. P., McConkey, I., McGraw, K., and Lu, S-Y., “Multiple Cooperating Knowledge Sources for the Design of Building Energy Systems,” ASHRAE Transactions, Volume 1, Number 2, pages 490–500, 1990.Google Scholar
- 4.Corkill, D. and Lesser, V. R., “A Goal-Directed HEARSAY-II Architecture: Unifying Datardirected and Goal-directed Control,” Proceedings of the Second NCAI, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1982.Google Scholar
- 5.Davis, R., “Diagnostic Reasoning Based on Structure and Behavior,” In Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems, Bobrow, D. (editor), MIT Press, pp. 347–410, 1985.Google Scholar
- 6.Englemore, R. and Morgan, A. (Editors), Blackboard Systems, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1988Google Scholar
- 8.Erman, L. D. and Lesser, V. R., “A Multi-Level Organization for Problem Solving Using Many, Diverse, Cooperating Sources of Knowledge,” Proceedings Fourth IJCAI, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 483–490, 1975.Google Scholar
- 9.Hayes-Roth, B., Johnson, M.V., Garvey, A., and Hewett, M., “Application of the BB1 Blackboard Architecture to Arrangement-Assembly Tasks,” International Journal for Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, Special Issue on Blackboard Systems, 1(2) 85–94.Google Scholar
- 10.Hayes-Roth, B., Garver, A., Johnson, M. V., and Hewett, M., “PROTEAN: Deriving Protein Structure from Constraints,” Proceedings of Fifth NCAI, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 904–909, 1986.Google Scholar
- 11.Hayes-Roth, B., “A Blackboard Architecture for Control,” Artificial Intelligence, Elsevier Publishers, pp. 251–321, 1985.Google Scholar
- 12.Hayes-Roth, B, Hayes-Roth, F., Rosenschein, F., and Cammarata, S., “Modelling Planning as an Incremental Opportunistic Process,” Proceedings Sixth IJCAI, William/Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 375–383, 1979.Google Scholar
- 13.Jagannathan, V., Dodhiawala, R., and Baum, L. (Editors), Blackboard Architectures and Applications, Academic Press, 1989.Google Scholar
- 14.Laliberty, T., et al., “A Blackboard Architecture for Integrated Process Planning/Production Scheduling,” In Proceedings of the ASME Design for Manufacturing, ASME, 1996.Google Scholar
- 15.Murphy, A., et al., “’Blackboard Approach to Process Planning Problems,” In Knowledge-Based Expert Systems for Engineering: Planning and Design, Sriram, D. and Adey, R. (Editors), Computational Mechanics Publications, pp. 35–51, 1987.Google Scholar
- 16.Nii, P. and Brown, H., AAAI Tutorial Notes No. HA2, American Association of Artificial Intelligence, 1987.Google Scholar
- 17.Nii, P., Feigenbaum, E., Anton, J., and Rockmore, A., “Signal-to-Symbol Transformation: HASP/SIAP Case Study,” AI Magazine, Vol. 2, No. 2., pp. 23–35, Spring 1982.Google Scholar
- 18.Nii, P., “The Blackboard Model of Problem Solving: Part I,” AI Magazine, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 38–53, 1986.Google Scholar
- 19.Reich, Y. and Fenves, S. J., Floor System Design in SOAR: A Case Study of Learning to Learn, Technical Report No: EDRC-12-26-88, Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, 1988.Google Scholar
- 20.Sriram, D., Logcher, R., Groleau. N., and Cherneff, J., DICE: An Object Oriented Programming Environment for Cooperative Engineering Design, Technical Report IESL-89-03, IESL, Dept. of Civil Engineering, M. I, T., 1989.Google Scholar
- 22.Tommelein, I.D., SightPlan — An Expert System that Models and Augments Human Decision-Making for Designing Construction Site Layouts, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (available from University Microfilms), August 1989. (For a shorter version see “Constructing Site Layouts using Blackboard Reasoning with Layered Knowledge,” In Allen, R. (editor), Expert Systems for Civil Engineers: Knowledge Representation, ASCE Monograph Series, pages 214-258, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1992.)Google Scholar
- 23.Tommelein, I.D., Hayes-Roth, B., Levitt, R.E., “Altering the Sight Plan Knowledge-based Systems,” J. of Artificial Intell. in Engrg., Design, and Mfrg., (AI EDAM), 6(1), 19–37, 1992.Google Scholar
- 24.Tommelein, I., Levitt, R. E., and Hayes-Roth, B., “Using Expert Systems for the Layout of Temporary Facilities on Construction Site,” CIB W-65 Symposium, Organization and Management of Construction, Birkshire, 1987 (See also Tommelein’s Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University).Google Scholar