Skip to main content

Knowledge Representation

  • Chapter
  • 230 Accesses

Abstract

The answer to the question What is knowledge? is not trivial. Bertrand Russell (Analysis of mind, Chapter XII) rightly said:

  • “It is difficult to define knowledge, difficult to decide whether we have any knowledge, and difficult, even if it is conceded that we sometimes have knowledge, to discover whether we can ever know that we have knowledge in this or that particular case.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberts, L. K., “YMIR: A Domain-Independent Ontology for the Formal Representation of Engineering Design Knowledge,” In Gero, J. and Tyugu, E. (Editors), Formal Design Methods for Computer-aided Design, IFIP Workshop Proceedings (Published by Chapman Hall), 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Apte, C, Expert Knowledge Management For Multi-level Modeling with an Application to Well-Log Analysis, Technical Report, Computer Science Department, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barr, A. and Feigenbaum, E., The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. I, Williom Kaufmann, Inc., Los Altos, California, pages 190–191, 1981.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Carboneil, J., “AI Languages and Problem Solving,” In The Role of Language in Problem Solving, Jerigan, R. and Hamill, B. W. (Editors), Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 83–102, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chandrasekaran, B., “Towards a Taxonomy of Problem Solving,” AI Magazine, Volume IV, pp. 9–18, Winter/Spring 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, R., “Diagnosis Via Causal Reasoning: Paths of Interaction and the Locality Principle,” In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 88–94, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Kleer, J., Causal and Teleological Reasoning in Circuit Recognition, Technical Report TR-529, AI Laboratory, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA 02139, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. El-Khoury, R., A Framework for Integrated Process Control, unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA 02139, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fikes, R., Gruber, T., Iwasaki, Y., Levy, A., and Nayak, P., How Things Work Project Overview, Technical Report KSL 91-70 Update, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, April 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fikes, R., “The Role of Representation in Reasoning,” Communications of the ACM, pp. 904–920, September 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Findler, N. V. (Editor), Associative Networks, Academic Press, New York, 1979.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Firebaugh, M. W., Artificial Intelligence: A Knowledge-Based Approach, Boyd & Fraser Publisher Company, MA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Forbus, K. D., “Qualitative Process Theory,” Artificial Intelligence Journal, 24: 85–168, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fox, M., Knowledge Representation for Decision Support, In Methlie, L. B. and Sprague, R. H. (Editors), Knowledge Representation for Decision Support Systems, Elsevier, North Holland, pp. 3–26, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ganguly, J., Kausel, E., and Sriram, D., “Integrated Framework for Deriving Behavior From Structural Descriptions,” ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, October 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Genesereth, M., “The Use of Design Descriptions in Automated Diagnosis,” In Bobrow (Editor), Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems, MIT Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Genesereth, M. and Nilsson, N., Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gruber, T. and Olsen, G. R., The Engineering Math Ontologies, World Wide Web URL (1994): “http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/knowledge-sharing/README.html.”

  19. Hart, P., “Directions for AI in the Eighties,” Sigart Newsletter, No. 79, pp. 11–16, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hendrix, G. G., Expanding the Utility of Semantic Networks through Partitioning, In Proceedings Fourth IJCAI, pp. 115–121, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hodges, J., Naive Mechanics: A Computational Model for Representing and Reasoning about Simple Mechanical Devices, Phd Dissertation, Computer Sciences Department, University of California, Los Angeles, November 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kahn, G., Kepner, A., and Pepper, J., “TEST: A Model-Driven Application Shell,” In Proceedings Sixth NCAI (AAAI), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., pp. 814–818, July 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kemper, A. and Moerkotte, G., Object-Oriented Database Management, Prentice-Hall, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, W. and Lochovsky, F. (Editors), Object-Oriented Languages, Applications, and Databases, Addison Wesley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kowalik, J. S. (Editor), Coupling Symbolic and Numerical Computing in Expert Systems, Elsevier, North Holland, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kowalik, J. S. and Kitzmiller, T. (Editor), Coupling Symbolic and Numerical Computing in Expert Systems, Elsevier, North Holland, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lehmann, F. (Editor), Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence, Pergamon Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lenat, D. B., “CYC: A Large-Scale Investment in Knowledge Infrastructure,” Communications of the ACM, November, Volume 38, Number 11, pages 33–38, 1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lenat, D. B., “Common Sense Reasoning,” AI Magazine, pp. 65–85, Winter 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lin, T. Y. and Sotesbury, S. D., Structural Concepts and Systems for Architects and Engineers, John Wiley and Sons, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Minsky, M., “A Framework for Representing Knowledge,” In Winston (Editor), Psychology of Computer Vision, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Neapolitan, R. E., Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems: Theory and Algorithms, John Wiley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Newell, A., “Physical Symbol Systems,” Cognitive Science, No. 4, pp. 135–183, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nilsson, N., Principles of Artificial Intelligence, Tioga Publishing Company, Palo Alto, California, 1980 [Now sold by Morgan Kaufmann, Inc.].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Pearl, J., Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Quinlan, M. R., Semantic Memory, Technical Report AFCRC-66-189, BBN, Cambridge, MA, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Regli, W. C, Geometric Algorithms for Recognition of Features from Solid Models, Ph. D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Robson, D., “Object-Oriented Software Systems,” Byte, pp. 74–86, August 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sembumoorthy, V. and Chandrasekaran, B., “Functional Representation of Devices and Compilation of Diagnostic Problem-Solving Systems,” In Kolodner, J. and Riesbeck, C. K. (Editors), Experience, Memory, and Reasoning, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 47–73, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Simmons, R., “The Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Simulations,” In Proceedings Third NCAI (AAAI-83), Morgan Kaufmann, Inc, pp 364–368, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shapiro, S. (Editor), Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence, John Wiley, New York 1987, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schank, R. and Abelson, R., Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding, Lawrence-Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1977.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Shah, J. and Mantyla, M., Parametric and Feature-based CAD/CAM, John Wiley & Sons, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sowa, J. (Editor), Principles of Semantic Networks, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stefik, M. and Bobrow, D., “Object Oriented Programming: Themes and Variations,” AI Magazine, pp. 40–62, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Taie, M. R. and Srihari, S. N., “Device Modeling for Fault Diagnosis,” IEEE/CS Expert Systems in Government Symposium, IEEE Computer Press, pp. 144–150, October 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tsichritzis, D. C. and Lochovsky, F. H., Data Models, Prentice-Hall Inc., New York, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  48. Winograd, T., “Frame Representation and the Declarative/Procedural Controversy,” In Bobrow, D. and Collins, A., (Editors), Representation and Understanding, Academic Press, pp. 185–210, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Winston, P., Artificial Intelligence, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Massachusetts, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sriram, R.D. (1997). Knowledge Representation. In: Intelligent Systems for Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0631-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0631-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1167-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0631-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics