Advertisement

Computational Support for Conceptual Sketching

Analysis and Interpretation of the Graphical Notation of Visual Representations
  • Jeanette Mcfadzean
Conference paper

Abstract

The research investigates how designers sketch specifically analysing the physical details of mark-making. It contrasts the physical representations with the abstract cognitive processes of architectural design. A new form of protocol analysis has been developed using video and computer records of designers’ sketching activity. The research compares the designer’s post-hoc commentary and interpretations of the sketching activity with the computer’s record of that activity. This process will lead to a greater understanding of the relationships between design events and graphical events.

Keywords

Protocol Analysis Design Event External Representation Graphical Notation Graphical Event 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cross N, Christiaans H, Dorst K. Analysing Design Activity. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, 1996Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Do E. Protocol Analysis of 3 designers. Personal communication, The Sundance Lab, University of Colorado, Boulder, 1998Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suwa M, Tversky B. What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 1997; 18(4):385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Suwa, M., Purcell T, Gero J. Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers’ cognitive actions. Design Studies (to appear), 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Finke RA, Ward TB, Smith SM. Creative Cognition: Theory, Research and applications. MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1996Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karniloff-Smith A. Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1995Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Sommers P. Drawing and Cognition. Drawing ability. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Akin O, Lin C. Design Protocol Data and Novel Design Decisions. In: Cross N et al (ed) Analysing Design Activity, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chichester, 1996 pp 35–62Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oxman R. Design by Re-representations: A Model of Visual Reasoning in Design. Design Studies, 1997; 18(4):329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol Analysis: verbal reports as data. The MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1993Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeanette Mcfadzean
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Design & InnovationOpen UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations