Skip to main content

Modelling Uncertainty in Biomedical Applications of Neural Networks

  • Conference paper
Book cover Artificial Neural Networks in Medicine and Biology

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Neural Computing ((PERSPECT.NEURAL))

  • 239 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we argue that the explicit account of uncertainty in data modeling is particularly important for biomedical applications of neural networks and related techniques. There are several sources of uncertainty of a model, including noise, bias and variance. Unless one attempts to identify or minimize the sources that contribute to errors of a particular application, one only has a sub-optimal solution. If, on the other hand, one does attempt to model uncertainty, one gets several major advantages. We discuss several methods for modeling uncertainty, including density estimation, Bayesian inference and complex noise models, in the context of several sample applications — most notably in the domain of biosignal processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ. An information maximisation approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation 1995; 7:1129–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oja E. From neural learning to independent components. Neurocomputing 1998; 22:187–200

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Penny WD, Roberts SJ. Hidden Markov Models with Extended Observation Densities, Imperial College, Neural Systems Research Group, Technical Report TR-98-15, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vapnik V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop CM. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  6. Penny WD, Roberts SJ. Neural network predictions with error bars. Imperial College, Neural Systems Research Group, Research Report TR-97-1, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hasan J. Automatic analysis of sleep recordings: a critical review. Annals-Clin-Res. 1985; 17:280–287

    Google Scholar 

  8. Breiman L. Bias, variance, and arcing classifiers., Statistics Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, Tech. Rep. 460, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bishop CM. Mixture Density Networks, Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Aston University, Birmingham, UK, NCRG/94/004, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neal RM. Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokyo, 1996

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. MacKay DJC. Bayesian Methods for Adaptive Models. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dorffner G, Leitgeb E, Koller H. A comparison of linear and non-linear classifiers for the detection of coronary artery disease in stress-ECG, in Horn W. et al.(eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Springer, Berlin, LNAI 1620, 1999, pp.227–231

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Flexer A. Statistical Evaluation of Neural Network Experiments: Minimum Requirements and Current Practice. in Trappl R. (ed.): Cybernetics and Systems’ 96, Oesterreichische Studiengesellschaft fuer Kybernetik, Wien, 2 vols, 1996., pp. 1005–1008

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rezek IA, Roberts SJ. Stochastic Complexity Measures for Physiological Signal Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1998; 44:1186–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sykacek P, Dorffner G, Rappelsberger P, Zeitlhofer J. Experiences with bayesian learning in a real world application. In Jordan M.I., et al.: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 10, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge/London, 1998, pp.964–970

    Google Scholar 

  16. Flexer A, Sykacek P, Rezek IA, Dorffner G. Using Hidden Markov Models to build an automatic, continuous and probabilistic sleep stager for the SIESTA project (extended abstract), Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 1999; Supplement 2, Proceedings of EMBEC’99, p.1658–1659

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sykacek P, Roberts SJ, Rezek IA, Flexer A, Dorffner G. Reliability in preprocessing — Bayes rules SIESTA (extended abstract), Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 1999; suppl. EMBEC’99

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dorffner, G., Sykacek, P., Schittenkopf, C. (2000). Modelling Uncertainty in Biomedical Applications of Neural Networks. In: Malmgren, H., Borga, M., Niklasson, L. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks in Medicine and Biology. Perspectives in Neural Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0513-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0513-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-289-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0513-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics