Skip to main content

Protein β-Sheet Partner Prediction by Neural Networks

  • Conference paper
Artificial Neural Networks in Medicine and Biology

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Neural Computing ((PERSPECT.NEURAL))

  • 238 Accesses

Abstract

Predicting the secondary structure (α-helices, β-sheets, coils) of proteins is an important step towards understanding their three dimensional conformations. Unlike α-helices that are built up from one contiguous region of the polypeptide chain, β-sheets are more complex resulting from a combination several disjoint regions. The exact nature of these long distance interactions remains unclear. Here we introduce a neural-network based method for the prediction of amino acid partners in parallel as well as anti-parallel β-sheets. The neural architecture predicts whether two residues located at the center of two distant windows are paired or not in a β-sheet structure. The distance between the windows is a third essential input into the architecture. Variations on this architecture are trained using a large corpus of curated data. Prediction on both coupled and non-coupled residues currently exceeds 83% accuracy, well above any previously reported method. Unlike standard secondary structure prediction methods, the use of multiple alignment (profiles) in our case seems to degrade the performance, probably as a result of intra-chain correlation effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R.A. Abagyan and S. Batalov. Do aligned sequences share the same fold? J. Mol. Biol., 273:355–368, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Baldi and S. Brunak. Bioinformatics: The Machine Learning Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Baldi, S. Brunak, P. Frasconi, G. Soda, and G. Pollastri. Exploiting the past and the future in protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics, 15:937–946, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. A. Cuff and G. J. Barton. Evaluation and improvement of multiple sequence methods for protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins, 34:508–519, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. U. Hobohm and C. Sander. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci., 3:522, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. X. Huang and W. Miller. Adv. Appl. Math., 12:337–357, 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. T. J. Hubbard. Use of b-strand interaction pseudo-potentials in protein structure prediction and modelling. In R. H. Lathrop, editor, In: Proceedings of the Biotechnology Computing Track, Protein Structure Prediction Minitrack of 27th HICSS, pages 336–354. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. T. Jones. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol, 292:195–202, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. W. Kabsch and C. Sander. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen—bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 22:2577–2637, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O. Lund, K. Frimand, J. Gorodkin, H. Bohr, J. Bohr, J. Hansen, and S. Brunak. Protein distance constraints predicted by neural networks and probability density functions. Prot. Eng., 10:1241–1248, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Pauling and R.B. Corey. Configurations of polypeptide chains with favored orientations around single bonds: Two new pleated sheets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 37:729–740, 1951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. K. Riis and A. Krogh. Improving prediction of protein secondary structure using structured neural networks and multiple sequence alignments. J. Comput. Biol., 3:163–183, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M.A. Wouters and P.M.G. Curmi. An analysis of side chain interaction and pair correlation within anti-parallel beta-sheets: The difference between backbone hydrogen-bonded and non-hydrogen-bonded residue pairs. Proteins, 22:119–131, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. E. Wright and H. J. Dyson. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. Journal of Molecular Biology, 293:321–331, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Zhu and W. Braun. Sequence specificity, statistical potentials, and three-dimensional structure prediction with self-correcting distance geometry calculations of beta-sheet formation in proteins. Protein Science, 8:326–342, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baldi, P., Pollastri, G., Andersen, C.A.F., Brunak, S. (2000). Protein β-Sheet Partner Prediction by Neural Networks. In: Malmgren, H., Borga, M., Niklasson, L. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks in Medicine and Biology. Perspectives in Neural Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0513-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0513-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-289-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0513-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics