Classifying Spinal Measurements Using a Radial Basis Function Network
Injuries to the lumbar region of industrial workers’ spines are relatively commonplace, due, for example, to over-exposure to vibrating machinery and inadequate provisions for heavy lifting. In contrast with earlier decades, management is much more likely to be sued in a court of law if an employee suspects bad management practice. Whereas severe damage to an individual’s lumbar region is usually apparent, typically because of immobility, less severe damage is harder to detect. In such cases a court of law calls for an expert witness to gauge the extent of the damage that an employment environment may inflict on an individual’s spine.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Burton, K., and Tillotson, M. Quantification of overload injuries of thoracolumbular vertebrae in persons exposed to heavy physical exertions or vibrations in the workplace. European Coal and Steel Community, Fifth Medical Programme, 1993.Google Scholar
- Burton, K., Tillotson, M., Biggermann, M., Brinckmann, P., and Frobin F. Quantification of overload injuries of thoracolumbular vertebrae in persons exposed to heavy physical exertions or vibrations in the workplace Part II: Occurrence and magnitude of overload injury in exposed cohorts. Clinical Biomechanics 13, 1998.Google Scholar
- Spinal Research Unit, University of Huddersfield, Cross Church Street, Huddersfield, England.Google Scholar
- Powell, M. J. D. Radial basis functions in 1990. Advances in Numerical Analysis Volume II, Cox. and Mason (Eds.), Oxford University Press. 105–210, 1991.Google Scholar
- Dyn, N. Interpolation of scattered data by radial functions. Topics in Multivariate Approximation, Schumaker, Chui and Utreras (Eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1997, pp. 47–61.Google Scholar
- Langdell, S. J. Radial basis function networks for modelling real world data. Ph.D. thesis, University of Huddersfield, 1998.Google Scholar
- Friedman, J. H. Flexible metric nearest neighbour classification. Technical Report, Stanford University, 1994.Google Scholar