Skip to main content

Ceramic on Ceramic Bearing Surfaces

  • Chapter
Interfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract

The principal cause of aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the mid and long term is caused by the reaction of the periprosthetic bone to wear particles both from the components of the implanted prosthesis (metal, polyethylene, ceramic, carbon, etc.), and from cement if cement is used. Wear debris occurs at the head-socket interface even if the prosthesis is securely fixed, and movement between prosthesis and bone is limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taylor SK, Serekian S, Monley M. Wear performance of a contemporary alumina-alumina friction couple under anatomically relevant hip joint simulator. Poster at the 65th AAOS meeting, New Orleans, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walter A. On the material and the tribology of alumina-alumina coupling for hip joint prostheses. Clin Orthop 1992;282:31–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dorlot JM (1992) Long-term effect of alumina components in total hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 282:47–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Willmann G. Oxide ceramics for articulating components of total hip replacement. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ceramics in Medicine, Paris. Bioceramics 1997;10:123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christel P. Biocompatibility of surgical grade dense poly-crystalline alumina. Clin Orthop 1992;282:10–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lerouge S, Huk O, Yahia L, Sedel S, Witvoet J. Ceramic-ceramic on metal-PE. A comparison of periprosthetic tissue from loosened total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1997;79B:135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lerouge S, Huk O, Yahia L, Sedel S. Characterisation of in vivo wear debris from ceramic-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:627–633.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Willert HG, Semlitsch M. Reactions of the articular joint capsule to wear products of artificial joint prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 1977;11: 157.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fritsch EW, Gleitz M. Ceramic femoral head fractures in THA. Clin Orthop 1996;328:129–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Higuchi F, Shiba N, Inone A, Wakebe I. Fracture of an alumina ceramic head in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995;10:851–854.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nizard R, Sedel L, Christel P, Meunier A, Soudry M, Witvoet J. Ten years survivorship of cemented ceramic-ceramic total hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 1992;282:53–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Plenk H, Buhler M, Walter A, Knahr K, Salter M. Fifteen years experience with alumina ceramic total hip joint endo-prostheses: a clinical, historical and tribological analysis. In: Ravagliolo A, Krewski A (eds) Bioceramic and the human body. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1992; 17–25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Quack G, Willenamm G, Pieper H, Krall H. Improvement of THR with spongiosa metal surface using the wear couple ceramic on ceramic. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Ceramics in Medicine, Paris. Bioceramics 1997;10:123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mittelmaier H, Heisel J. Sixteen years experience with ceramic hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 1992;282:64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sedel L, Nizard R, Kerboull L, Witvoet J. Alumina-alumina hip replacement in patients younger than 50 years old. Clin Orthop 1994;298:175–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Winter M, Griss P, Scheller G, Moser T. Ten to 14 years results of a ceramic hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop 1992;282:73–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Crolet JM, Christel P, Sedel L, Witvoet J. Comparative numerical simulation of humaniliae bone fitted with different types of acetabular component (0.20 finite elements analysis). 4th European Conference on Biomaterials, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Massin P, Schmidt MD, Engh CA. Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration. J Arthroplasty 1989;4(3) 245–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographie analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979;141:17–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Witvoet, J., Nizard, R., Sedel, L. (2000). Ceramic on Ceramic Bearing Surfaces. In: Learmonth, I.D. (eds) Interfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0477-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0477-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1150-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0477-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics