Skip to main content

RIPPLE: Retaining Integrity in Process Products over their Long-term Evolution

  • Chapter
Book cover Systems Engineering for Business Process Change
  • 110 Accesses

Abstract

RIPPLE is one of a linked set of projects at the University of Ulster which are based on the premise that an organisation and its IT facilities should be aligned and evolve together towards a documented ‘vision’ for the system as a whole. This strategy is intended to ensure that software development is directly supportive of an organisation and remains aligned as business and computing changes occur. This paper describes 10 contributions made by RIPPLE to a framework for software development based on the co-evolutionary concept. The framework, BASE, is built around the modelling of co-evolutionary change, expressed in the form of a development plan. Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) is used to establish the vision for an organisation and much of the work has been concerned with building on the models that it produces. RIPPLE is a collaborative project with the Northern Ireland Civil Service and BT, with additional contributions from NEC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the System for Organisations. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boar, B.H. (1994). Practical Steps for Aligning Information Technology with Business Strategy. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, B.W. (1988). A spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer, 21 (5), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustard, D.W. and He, Z. (1998). A framework for the revolutionary planning and evolutionary implementation of a business process and its computing support. Logistics Information Management, 11(6), 370–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustard, D.W. and He, Z. (1999). System co-evolution: a software engineering perspective. In Proceedings of SOHE ‘89, Workshop on Software and Organisation Co-Evolution, Oxford, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustard, D.W. and Lundy, P.J. (1995). Enhancing soft systems analysis with formal modelling. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering. IEE Press, pp. 164–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustard, D.W. and Lundy, P.J. (1999). A software engineering framework for methods integration (submitted for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustard, D.W., Oakes, R. and Heslin, E. (1993). Support for the integrated use of conceptual and dataflow models in requirements specification. In Colloquium on Requirements for Software Intensive Systems, DRA Malvern, pp. 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustard, D.W., Dobbin, T.J. and Carey, B.N. (1996). Integrating soft systems and object-oriented analysis. In IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, Colorado Springs, CO, pp. 52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustard, D.W., Oakes, R. and Vincent, D.D. (1997). Business analysis for computing purposes: one analyst or two? In Stowell et al. (eds), Systems for Sustainability, Proceedings of UKSS’97. Plenum Press, pp. 549–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustard, D.W., He, Z. and Wilkie, F.G. (1999a). Soft systems and use-case modelling: mutually supportive or mutually exclusive? In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-32), Maui, Hawaii (CD-ROM). IEEE, 8 pp. (also revised and accepted for publication in Interacting with Computers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustard, S.W., Oakes, R. and Vincent, D.D. (1999b). Retaining and maintaining soft system models. In Castell, A.M. et al. (eds), Synergy Matters, Working with Systems in the 21 st Century, Proceedings of UKSS ‘89. Plenum Press, pp. 409–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustard, D.W., Oakes, R. and He, Z. (1999c). Models to promote effective system change. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM ‘89, Oxford, UK, 30 August-3 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustard, D.W., Greer, D., He, Z., Lundy, P., Oakes, R. and Wilkie, F.G. (2000a). The co-evolution of a business and its computing support. In Bustard, D.W., Kawalek, P. and Norris, M.T. (eds), Systems Modelling for Business Process Improvement, Artec House, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustard, D.W., Kawalek, P. and Norris, M.T. (eds) (2000b). Systems Modelling for Business Process Improvement. Artec House, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castell A.M. et al. (eds) (1999). Synergy matters, working with systems in the 21st century. In Proceedings of UKSS ‘89. Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. and Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilb, T. (1988). Principles of Software Engineering Management. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, D. and Bustard, D.W. (1997). SERUM: software engineering risk: understanding and management. Project and Business Risk Management, 1(4), 373–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, D., Bustard, D.W. and Sunazuka, T. (1999). Prioritisation of System Changes Using Cost-Benefit and Risk Assessments, RE ‘89, Limerick, pp. 180–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Z. and Bustard, D.W. (1999a). Semantic Model Linkage in the BASE Framework.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Z. and Bustard, D.W. (1999b). A CASE Tool Design for Co-Evolution of a Business Process and its Supporting Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucopoulos, P. and Karakostas, V. (1995). System Requirements Engineering. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. and Taylor, S. (1992). The use of soft systems methodology in practice. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43(4), 321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rook, P. (1986). Controlling software projects. Software Engineering Journal, 1(1), 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I. and Booch, G. (1998). Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOHE (1999). Proceedings of SOHE.’99, Workshop on Software and Organisation Co-Evolution, Oxford, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, I. and Saywer, P. (1997). Requirements Engineering, A Good Practice Guide. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, F.A. (ed.) (1995). Information Systems Provision: The Contributions of SSM. McGraw-Hill, London:

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, K.J. (ed.) (1993). Using Formal Description Techniques: An Introduction to ESTELLE, LOTOS and SDL. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1990). Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications( 2nd edn ). Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bustard, D.W., Greer, D., He, Z., Lundy, P.J., Wilkie, F.G., Oakes, R. (2000). RIPPLE: Retaining Integrity in Process Products over their Long-term Evolution. In: Henderson, P. (eds) Systems Engineering for Business Process Change. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0457-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0457-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1146-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0457-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics