Skip to main content

Delivering Business Performance: Opportunities and Challenges for IT

  • Chapter
Systems Engineering for Business Process Change

Abstract

The need for an interdisciplinary approach to the development and evolution of IT systems is now being recognised within the software engineering and information systems communities. This recognition helped to stimulate the formation of the Software Engineering and Information Systems Network (SEISN). The network holds regular meetings in order to facilitate collaboration between academics and industrialists as well as to facilitate collaboration between academics in the two disciplines. The first SEISN workshop, held in London on 15 March 1999, brought together researchers and practitioners from both fields, stimulating some lively discussions and highlighting areas for future research. This chapter reports on the work done by the workshop’s four Working Groups.

R. Harrison and M. Wells were affiliated with the University of Southampton at the time this workshop was held.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Venkatraman, N. Managing IT resources as a value centre: the leadership challenge. In Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox, Willcocks, L. and Lester, S. (eds). Wiley, 1999, pp. 217–244.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pralahad, C.K. and Hamel, G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 1990, May-June.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ward, J. A portfolio approach to evaluating information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 1990, 5(4), 222–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Farbey, B., Land, E and Targett, D. IS evaluation: a process for bringing together benefits, costs and risks. In Rethinking Management Information Systems, Currie, W.L. and Galliers, R.D. (eds). OUP, 1999, pp. 204–228.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Farbey, B., Land F. and Targett, D. How to Assess your IT Investment. Butterworth Heinemann, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ward, J., Taylor P. and Bond, P. Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: an empirical study of current practice. European Journal of Information Systems, 1995, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Willcocks, L. Evaluating IT investment. Journal of Information Systems, 1992, 2, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keen, J. The evaluation of leading edge technologies. In Hard Money, Soft Outcomes, Farbey, B., Land, E and Targett, D. (eds). Waller, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Graeser, V., Willcocks, L.P. and Pisania, N. (1998). Developing the I.T. scorecard report. Business Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert, D.R., Hartman, E., Mauriel, I.J. and Freeman, R.E. A Logic for Strategy. Ballinger, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Willcocks, L. and Lester, S. (eds). Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox. Wiley, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Friedman, A.L. and Cornford, D.S. Computer Systems Development: History, Organization and Implementation. Wiley, Chichester, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Checkland, P.B. and Holwell, S. Information, Systems and Information Systems. Wiley, Chichester, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Porter, M.E. Competitive Advantage. Free Press, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Toffler, A. Powershift. Bantam Books, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Behrsin, M., Mason, G. and Sharpe, T. Reshaping IT for Business Flexibility. McGraw-Hill, London, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ciborra, C.U. Teams, Markets and Systems. Cambridge University Press, 1993, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  18. How computers can choke companies. The Economist, 1990, 9 June, p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Allen, B.R. and Boynton, A.C. Information architecture: in search of flexibility. MIS Quarterly, 1991, December, 435–445.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fitzgerald, G. Achieving flexible information systems: the case for improved analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 1990, 5, 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fitzgerald, G., Philippides, A. and Probert, S. Information systems development, maintenance and enhancement: findings from a UK study. International Journal of Information Management, 1999, 19, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Avison, D. What is IS?Inaugural lecture, University of Southampton, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wells, M.J. and Harrison, R. A Meta-analysis of Multidisciplinary Research. Technical report, University of Reading, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parra, A. Research evolution: reacting to software development evolution. A position paper submitted to the ICSW99 Workshop: Empirical Studies of Software Development and Evolution (ESSDE), May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Truex, D.P., Baskerville, R. and Klein, H. Growing systems in emergent organizations. Communications of the ACM, 1999, 42 (8), 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fenton, N., Pfleeger, S.L. and Glass, R.L. Science and substance: a challenge to software engineers. IEEE Software, 1994, July, 86–95.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zelkowitz, M.V. and Wallace, D.R. Experimental models for validating technology. IEEE Computer, 1998, May, 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Glass, R.L. The software research crisis. IEEE Software, 1994, November, 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bagert, D.J. Taking the lead in licensing software engineers. CACM, 1999, 42 (4), 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Harrison, R. and Wells, M. Multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research methods and their impact on software and system design. In Workshop on Empirical Studies of Software Maintenance (WESS ‘89), Oxford, September 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Porter, A. Fundamental laws and assumptions of software maintenance: summary. In International Workshop on Empirical Studies of Software Maintenance (WESS ‘86), November 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rosenberg, J. Problems and prospects in quantifying software maintainability. In International Workshop on Empirical Studies of Software Maintenance (WESS’96), November 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harrison, R., Wells, M., Brereton, P., Dunning-Lewis, P., Fitzgerald, G., Targett, D. (2000). Delivering Business Performance: Opportunities and Challenges for IT. In: Henderson, P. (eds) Systems Engineering for Business Process Change. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0457-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0457-5_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1146-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0457-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics