Pain relief in labour in Great Britain and Ireland

  • Geraldine O’Sullivan


The newly diagnosed pregnant mother is usually filled with curiosity about both the physical changes that will occur over the forthcoming months and the process of actually delivering her baby. Childbirth education is a major industry in both Great Britain and Ireland. Bookshops offer a large variety of pregnancy and childcare manuals and the National Childbirth Trust is a very successful enterprise offering antenatal and postnatal care and support to mothers. In the past many articles and book chapters on pain relief in labour failed to inform the mother in simple language about what she might expect to experience in her first and subsequent labours. Articles that place the same emphasis on the value of aromatherapy and homeopathy as on pharmacological analgesia during labour serve more to mislead than to educate.1 A more honest and open appraisal of pain in labour combined with statistics on the uptake of the various methods of pain relief would be of greater benefit to a woman than the carefully selected anecdotes of an author whose ideas have been polarised by her own experiences of childbirth. Whilst some excellent and informative lay publications are now available, relevant and up-to-date medical statistics on all aspects of labour are often inaccessible.


Caesarean Section Pain Relief Epidural Analgesia Caesarean Section Rate Maternity Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kitzinger S. The New Pregnancy and Childbirth. London: Penguin 1997Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pain and its relief in childbirth. Edited by Geoffrey Chamberlain, Ann Wraight, Philip Steer. London, Churchill Livingstone 1993Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perinatal profile. A review of the South East Thames perinatal statistics from 1988–1995Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burnstein R, Buckland R, Pickett JA. A survey of epidural analgesia for labour in the United Kingdom. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 634–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davies MW, Harrison JC, Ryan TDR. Current practice of epidural analgesia during normal labour. A survey of maternity units in the United Kingdom. Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 63–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thorp JA, Hu DH, Albin RM et al. The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized controlled prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 851–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Maternity Hospital, Dublin. Clinical Report for the Year 1997Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Halpern SH, Leighton BL, Ohlsson A, Barrett JFR, Rice A. Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor. JAMA 1998; 280: 2105–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Annual Statistic Return Report 1994. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coombe Women’s Hospital, Dublin, Annual Clinical Report 1996Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brown GW, Russell IF. A survey of anaesthesia for caesarean section. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1995; 4: 214–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robinson PN, Salmon P, Yentis SM. Maternal satisfaction. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1998; 7: 32–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morgan PJ, Halpern S, Lo J. The development of a materal satisfaction scale for caesarean section. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1999; 8: 165–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    MacArthur C, Lewis M, Knox EG. Evaluation of obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia: long term maternal recollections. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1993; 2: 3–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    First Class Delivery: A national survey of women’s views of maternity care. Audit Commission and the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit 1998Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Changing Childbirth: Report of the Expert Maternity Group. HMSO LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geraldine O’Sullivan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations