Abstract
The place of epidural analgesia in low risk pregnancy is controversial. Current midwifery and obstetric practice is to identify in the ante-natal period those pregnancies that can be classified as low risk. In assessing the woman her previous obstetric history, general health and age are taken into account. However, women who have had a normal antenatal experience do not necessarily proceed to normal labour; it is often stated that labour can only be defined as normal once the mother is safely delivered of her baby. If normal labour in low risk pregnancy is regarded as a natural process then intervention of any kind would redefine that labour as high risk and abnormal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Department of Health. Report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in England and Wales 1982–1984. London, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office 1989
Expert Maternity Group. Changing childbirth: the report of the expert maternity group. London: HMSO, 1993. (Cumberledge Report)
Holdcroft A, Morgan M. An assessment of the analgesic effect in labour of pethidine and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen (Entonox). J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1974; 81: 603–7
Reynolds F. Worrying about the wrong complications. OAA Annual Meeting (Abstract) 1995
Lucas DN, Millett SV, Yentis SM, Rubin AP, Robinson PN. An investigation into maternal attitudes to epidurals for pain relief in labour. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 1997; 6: 209–10
Lucas DN, Millett SV, Yentis SM, Rubin AP, Robinson PN. A survey of midwife, obstetric and maternal attitudes to epidurals for pain relief in labour. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1998; 7: 206
Graninger EM, McCool WP. Nurse-Midwives use of and attitudes toward epidural analgesia. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery 1998; vol. 43 no. 4: 250–61
Moore S. Regional anaesthesia. In: Understanding pain and its relief in labour. London, Churchill Livingstone 1997: 164–76
Brighouse D. Controversies in Obstetric Anaesthesia: Epidural analgesia in labour is not compatible with midwife led care. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1996; 5: 126–7
Vandendriesen NM, Lim W, Paech MJ, Michael C. Obstetricians’ Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Epidural Analgesia in Labour. Anaesth Intensive Care 1998; 26: 563–7
Howell CJ. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 1999.Oxford: Update Software
Morton SC, Williams MS, Keeler EB, Gambone JC, Kahn KL, Effect of epidural analgesia for labor on the cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 1045–52
Yancey MK, Pierce B, Schweitzer ID, Daniels D. Observations on labor, epidural analgesia and operative delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 353–9
Fogel ST, Shyken JM, Leighton BL, Mormol JS, Smeltzer JS. Epidural labor analgesia and the incidence of cesarean delivery for dystocia. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 119–23
Finster M, Santos A. The effects of epidural analgesia on the course and outcome of labour. In: Baillieres Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1998; 12: 473–83
Miller AC. The effects of epidural analgesia on uterine activity and labor. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 1997; 6: 2–18
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion: pain relief during labour. Int J Obstet 1993; 42: 73
Chestnut DH. Does epidural analgesia during labor affect the incidence of cesarean delivery? Reg Anesth. 1997; 22: 495–9
Savage W. 1986 A Savage enquiry. London: Virago
Melzack R. The myth of painless childbirth (the John J. Bonica lecture). Pain 1984; 19: 321–3
Pickett JA, Oppenheimer CA, May AE. Does midwifery led intrapartum care require anaesthetic services? International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1996; 5: 152–5
Data presented to the working group on maternity services RCOG 19–7–99. (unpublished)
Reynolds JL. Post traumatic stress disorder after childbirth: the phenomenon of traumatic birth. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 156: 831–5
May AE, Elton CD. The effects of pain and its management on mother and fetus. In: Baillieres Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1998; 12: 423–41
Shennan A, Cooke V, Loyd-Jones F, Morgan B, De Swiet M. Blood pressure changes during labour and whilst ambulating with combined spinal epidural analgesia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 192–7
Reynolds F. Auditing complications of regional analgesia in obstetrics (Editorial). International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 1998; 7: 1–4
Russell R, Dundas R, Reynolds F. Long term backache after childbirth: prospective search of causative factors. BMJ 1996; 312: 1384–88
Holdcroft A, Gibberd SB, Hargrove RL, Hawkins DF, Dellaportas CI. Neurological complications associated with pregnancy. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 522–6
First Class Delivery: Improving Maternity Services in England and Wales. Audit Commission 1997
First Class Delivery: A national survey of mother’s views of maternity care. Audit Commission and the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit 1998
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
May, A. (2000). Current indications for regional analgesia in labour: what is the place of epidural analgesia in normal labour?. In: Reynolds, F. (eds) Regional Analgesia in Obstetrics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0435-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0435-3_18
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1142-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0435-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive