Skip to main content

Clinical trials: up-down sequential allocation

  • Chapter
Book cover Regional Analgesia in Obstetrics

Abstract

Only in recent years have there been systematic evaluations of the concentration-response pharmacodynamics for epidural and intrathecal local anaesthetic agents. Whilst these have been determined for inhalation and intravenous anaesthetic agents using the clinical models of minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and minimum infusion rate (MIR) respectively, the same standards had not been applied to regional analgesic techniques. The majority of research into local anaesthetic dose requirements and the effect on them of other analgesics such as opioids, have generally been in the style of recipe designs with comparisons of fixed combinations of drugs. It is now clear that many of these studies have involved concentrations above the 95th centile for efficacy (EC95), at the top of the concentration-response curve where subtle differences will be missed or apparently similar efficacies misinterpreted. Study designs involving dose-varying regimens such as predetermined multiple dose testing, isobolographic methods and up-down sequential allocation are more informative than fixed recipe designs and allow quantification of effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Columb MO, Lyons G. Determination of the minimum local analgesic concentrations of epidural bupivacaine and lidocaine in labor. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 833–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Polley LS, Columb MO, Wagner DS, Naughton NN. Dose dependent reduction of the minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC) of bupivacaine by sufentanil for epidural analgesia in labor. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 626–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bräu ME, Vogel W, Hempelmann G. Fundamental properties of local anesthetics: Half-maximal blocking concentrations for tonic block of Na-and K* channels in peripheral nerve. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 885–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Columb MO, Lyons G, Naughton NN, Beckton WW. Determination of the minimum local analgesic concentration of epidural chloroprocaine hydrochloride in labor. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1997; 6: 39–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Polley LS, Columb MO, Lyons G, Nair S. Effect of epidural fentanyl on the minimum local analgesic concentration of epidural chloroprocaine in labor. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 987–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Christiaens F, Verbough C, Dierick A, Camu F. Effects of diluent volume of a single dose of epidural bupivacaine in parturients during the first stage of labor. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998; 23: 134–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Columb MO. Dose, concentration and volume: A triangulated circular argument! International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1998; 7: 64–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lyons G, Columb MO, Gorton H. Minimum local analgesic volume for epidural bupivacaine 0.125% w/v in labour. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: (suppl 1): 149–50

    Google Scholar 

  9. Columb MO, Lyons G, Polley LS, Capogna G, Benhamou D. Minimum Local Analgesic Concentration of Bupivacaine in Labor; a Metanalysis. Proc SOAP 1997; Al25

    Google Scholar 

  10. Capogna G, Celleno D, Lyons G, Columb M, Fusco P. Minimum local analgesic concentration of bupivacaine increases with progression of labour. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 11–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Columb MO, Lyons G, Polley LS, Capogna G, Gorton H. Bupivacaine requirements for labor analgesia. Proc SOAP. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: A74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lyons G, Columb MO, Hawthorne L, Dresner M. Epidural pain relief in labour; bupivacaine sparing by epidural fentanyl is dose dependent. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 493–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson APC, Lyons GR, Wilson RC, Sabrine A, Columb MO. Levobupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour; the sparing effect of extradural fentanyl. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: (Supplement 1) 208

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grass JA, Sakima NT, Schmidt R, Michitsch R, Zuckerman RL, Harris AP. A randomized, double-blind, dose-reponse comparison of epidural fentanyl versus sufentanil analgesia after caesarean section. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 365–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Polley LS, Columb MO, Naughton NN, Dorantes DM, Wagner DS, Van de Ven CJM. Effect of intravenous versus epidural fentanyl on the minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC) of epidural bupivacaine in labor. Proc SOAP. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: A25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D’Angelo R, Gerancher JC, Eisenach JC, Raphael BL. Epidural fentanyl produces analgesia by a spinal mechanism. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 1519–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Albright GA. Cardiac arrest following regional anesthesia with etidocaine or bupivacaine. Anesthesiology 1979; 51: 285–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Knudsen K, Suurküla MB, Blomberg S, Sjövall J, Edvardsson N: Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 507–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, Bowler GMR, Bloomfield P, Lundh R: Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 1989; 69: 563–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Capogna G, Celleno D, Lyons G, Columb M. Determination of the minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC) of epidural ropivacaine in labour. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 371–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Polley LS. Columb MO, Naughton NN, Wagner DS, Van de Ven CJM. Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor: Implications for therapeutic indexes. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 944–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McDonald SB, Liu SS, Kopacz DJ, Stephenson CA. Hyperbaric spinal ropivacaine: A comparison to bupivacaine in volunteers. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 971–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Santos AC, Arthur GR, Wlody D, de Armas P, Morishima HO, Finster M. Comparative systemic toxicity of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in non-pregnant and pregnant ewes. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 734–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Columb MO, Polley LS. Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine: Therapeutic implications. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: A73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. D’Angelo R, James RL. Is ropivacaine less potent than bupivacaine? Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 941–943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lyons G, Columb M, Wilson RC, Johnson RV. Extradural pain relief in labour: Potencies of levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81: 899–901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Arkoosh VA, Aluru D, Buxbaum JL, Leighton BL. Intrathecal bupivacaine dose-response in multiparous patients receiving oxytocin. Proc SOAP. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: A66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. D’Angelo R, Nelson KE, Meister G, Gaver R, Eisenach JC. Dose response study of spinal fentanyl in early labor. Proc SOAP, Anesthesiology 1998; 89: A17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Columb MO, Polley LS. In reply: Up-down sequential allocation technique to investigate the influence of opioids on the efficacy of epidural local anesthetics in labor pain. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1788–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Columb, M.O. (2000). Clinical trials: up-down sequential allocation. In: Reynolds, F. (eds) Regional Analgesia in Obstetrics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0435-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0435-3_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1142-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0435-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics