Skip to main content

Soft vs. Hard Computational Issues in Configuration Design

  • Conference paper
Soft Computing in Engineering Design and Manufacturing

Abstract

The engineering task of configuration design, the combination of pre-defined domain entities into a system that meets some specified requirements, is ill-defined: there is no computationally expressible algorithm available for consistently producing adequate designs.

This suggests that Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques must be applied to produce an automated design tool. However, past attempts at construction have relied on hard computing techniques, usually in the form of ‘hard-wiring’ design rules into a knowledge base, with the obvious necessity for all these rules to be available in an explicit form. This is rarely the case outside simple domains.

This design ‘knowledge’, then, is the crucial factor in such systems, and the difficulties involved in its acquisition and expression are persistent obstacles to their construction. In this paper, we show how a soft computing approach (artificial neural networks) can be applied to the problem of capturing and expressing some of the more nebulous elements of this knowledge, which is then incorporated within a conventional hard computing framework to provide a useful design tool. The use of neural networks would seem to be particularly agreeable in a design context, as they display some emergent properties associated with aspects of design creativity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Simon, H. A. and Newell, A., 1958, Heuristic problem solving: the next advance in operations research, Operations Research, 6(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McDermott, J., 1982, R1: A rule-based configurer of computer systems, Artificial Intelligence, 19(1), 39–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marcus, S., Stout, J. and McDermott, J., 1988, VT: An expert elevator designer that uses knowledge-based backtracking, AI Magazine, 9(1), 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berry, D., C., 1987, The problem of implicit knowledge, Expert Systems, 4(3), 144–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lenat, D. B., 1983, The role of heuristics in learning by discovery: three case studies. In Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Michalski, J, K, Carbonell, J. G. and Mitchell, T. M. (Eds.), Tioga Pub. Co., Palo Alto, CA., USA, 243–306.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Newell, A., 1980, Reasoning, problem solving and decision processes: the problem space as a fundamental category. Reprinted in P. S. Rosenbloom, J. E. Laird and A. Newell (Eds.), 1992, The Soar Papers: research on integrated intelligence, Volume 1, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., USA, 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wielinga, B., Vau de Velde, W., Schreiber, G. and Akkermans, I.I., 1992, The KADS knowledge modelling approach. In R. Mizoguchi et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Japanese Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Hitachi Advanced Research Laboratory, Hatoyama, Saitama, Japan, 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hayes, P. J., 1985, The second naive physics manifesto. Reprinted in R. J. Brachman and H. J. Levesque, 1985, Readings in Knowledge Representation, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., CA., USA, 468–485.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wielinga, B., Akkermans, J. M. and Schreiber, A. T., 1995, A formal analysis of parametric design problem solving, In B. R. Gaines and M. A. Musen (Eds.), Proceedings of the. 9th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Alberta, Canada, SRDG Publications, University of Calgary, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boden, M. A., 1991, The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, Abacus, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Waibel, A., Hanazawa, T., Hinton, G., Shikano, K. and Lang, K. J., 1989, Phoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 37, 328–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Potter, S., 1997, The development of machine learning architectures for engineering design, Report. Number 16/97, School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Potter, S., Chawdhry, P.K., Culley, S.J. (1998). Soft vs. Hard Computational Issues in Configuration Design. In: Chawdhry, P.K., Roy, R., Pant, R.K. (eds) Soft Computing in Engineering Design and Manufacturing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0427-8_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0427-8_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76214-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0427-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics