Skip to main content

Domain Knowledge in Engineering Design: Nature, Representation, and Use

  • Chapter
Industrial Knowledge Management

Abstract

Engineering design is a highly regulated activity. Design decisions need to be negotiated in light of engineering laws, professional standards, and other federal regulations. In this paper we are interested in the integrated and flexible support of engineering design. Integration requires that domain knowledge be an integral part of the design support system rather than an add-on. Flexible support requires that laws and regulations remain accessible and updatable to reflect technological advances and changes in regulations as they occur. We present a knowledge and object model that satisfies these two criteria. Designing a compliant engineering artifact is a lengthy and non-monotonic refinement process. We define a set of design milestones. We define the semantics of the object model and of the associated design milestones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Agrawal and N.H. Gehani. Ode (Object database and environment); the language and the data model. In Proc. ACM-SIGMOD 1989 Int’l Conf. Management of Data, pages 36–45, May 1989.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Francois Bancilhon, Claude Deloble, and Paris Kanellakis, editors. Building an Object-Oriented Database System: The Story of O2. Morgan Kaufmann, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frank Blackler, Michael Reed, and Alan Whitaker. Editorial introduction: Knowledge workers and contemporary organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 30(6):852–862, November 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grady Booch, James Rumbaugh, and Ivar Jacobson. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison Wesley, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.F. Cardena and D. McLeod, editors. Research foundations in object-oriented and semantic database system. Prentice Hall, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chun Wei Choo. The Knowing Organization. Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ch-Ch. P Chu and R. Gadh. Feature-based approach for set-up minimization of process design from product design. Computer-Aided Design, 28(5): 321–332,1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Prekumar Devanbu and Mark A. Jones. The use of descriptive logics in kbase systems. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 6(2): 141–172, April 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clive Dym. Engineering design- A Synthesis of views. Cambridge University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmed K. Elmagarmid, editor. Database Transaction Models for Advance Applications. Morgan-Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Fisher, et al. Seeding evolutionary growth and reseeding: supporting incremental development of design environments. In Human factors in computing systems (CHI’94), Pages 292–298,1994.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Gehani and H.G. Agadish. Ode as an active database: Constraints and triggers. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Vary Large data Bases, Pages 327–336, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Gehani and H.V. Jagadish. Ode as an active database: Constraints and triggers. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Vary Large Data Bases, Pages 327–336, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Gero and M.L. Maher. A framework for research in design computing. In Proceedings of ECAADE, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. John S, Gero. Creativity, emergence and evolution in design. Knowledge-Based Systems, 9:453–448, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.S. Gero and F. Sudweeks, editors. Artificial Intelligence in design. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. William E. Halal, editor. The infinite resource: Creating and leading the knowledge enterprise. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mansour, Val Collins and Dale Caviness. A survey of current object-oriented databases. DATABASE Advances, 26(1), February 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C.A. McMahon, J.H. Sims Williams, and J. Devlukia. Knowledge-based systems for automotive engineering design. In Autotech 1991, pages 1–7,1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ali Mili, Jules Desharaais, and Fatma Mili. Computer Program Construction. Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fatma Mili. Knowledge architecture for engineering design support. In Proceedings of AAAI spring symposium, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. A. Musen, et al. Protégé-II:computer support for development of intelligent systems from libraries of components. In Proceedings of MEDINFO’95, Eighth World Congress on Medical Informatics, pages 766–770, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Nichols. Getting engineering changes under control. Journal of Engineering Design, 1(1), 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shridhar Ramaswamy M. H. Nodine and S.B. Zdonik. A cooperative transaction mode for design databases. In Ahmed K. Elmagarmid, editor, Database Transaction Models for Advanced Applications. Morgan-Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 1996

    Google Scholar 

  25. Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., editor. SAE Handbook. Society of Automotive Engineers. Inc., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  26. K.A. Reinschmidt and G.A. Finn. Smarter computer-aided design. IEEE Expert, pages 50–55, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Research opportunities in engineering design (nsf strategic planning work-shop, final report). Technical report, Directorate of Engineering, National Science Foundation, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gerald H. Taylor. Knowledge companies. In William E. Halal, editor, The infinite resource, pages 97–110. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. Tong and D. Sriram, editors. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design: Volume I. Academic Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Y. Umeda and T. Tomiyama. Functional reasoning in design. IEEE Expert, pages 42–48, March–April, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Unigraphics. Addressing the CAD/CAM/CAE interoperability issue. White paper, Unigraphics, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Widmon and S. Ceri, editors. Active database systems: trigger and rules for advances database processing. Morgan-Kaufman Publishers, Inc., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Wong and D. Sriram. Shared: An information model for cooperative product development. Research in engineering design, (5):21–39,1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mili, F., Narayanan, K., VanDenBossche, D. (2001). Domain Knowledge in Engineering Design: Nature, Representation, and Use. In: Roy, R. (eds) Industrial Knowledge Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0351-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0351-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1075-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0351-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics