Advertisement

Project Memory in Design

  • Nada Matta
  • Myriam Ribière
  • Olivier Corby
  • Myriam Lewkowicz
  • Manuel Zacklad

Abstract

Learning from past projects allows designers to avoid past errors and solve problems. A number of methods define techniques to memorize lessons and experiences from projects. We present in this chapter an overview of these methods by emphasizing their main contributions and their critical points.

Keywords

Knowledge Management Design Rationale Design Project Semantic Network Project Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Bourigault D. and Lépine P. — Utilisation d’un logiciel d’extraction de terminologie (LEXTER) en acquisition des connaissances, Acquistion et Ingénierie des Connaissances, tendances actuelles, Editions Cépaduès, 1996Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Brice A. — Design Rationale Management (DRAMA), http://www.quantisci.co.uk/drama
  3. [3]
    Buckingham Shum S. — Representing Hard-to-Formalise, Contextualised, Multidisciplinary, Organisational Knowledge. Proceedings of AAI Spring Symposium on Artificial Intelligence in Knowledge Management, P.9–16, 1997.http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/AIKM97/AIKM97Proc.html Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Conklin J.E. and Yakemovic KC.B. — A Process-Oriented Approach to Design Rationale, Human-Computer Interactions, Vol.6, 1991.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Dieng R., Corby O., Giboin A. et Ribière M. — Methods and Tools for Corporate Knowledge Management, in Proc. of KAW’98, Banff, Canada.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Ermine J.L., Chaillot M., Bigeon P., Charenton B. et Malavielle D., MKSM a method for knowledge management, Knowledge management: Organization, Competence and Methodology, Proceedings of ISMICK’96, Schreimenmakers ed., Rotterdam, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Klein M. — Capturing Design Rationale in Concurrent Engineering Teams, IEEE, Computer Support for Concurrent Engineering, January 1993.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Lewkowicz M., Zacklad M., MEMO-net, un collecticiel utilisant la méthode de résolution de problème DIPA pour la capitalisation et la gestion des connaissances dans les projets de conception, IC’99, Palaiseau, 14–16 juin 1999, p.119–128.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    MacLean A., Young R.M., Bellotti V.M.E., Moran T.P., — Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis, Human-Computer Interaction, Vol.6, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Mal vache P. et Prieur P. — Mastering Corporate Experience with the REX Method, Management of Industrial and Corporate Memory, Proceedings of ISMICK’93, Compiègne 1993.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    McCullough D., Korelsky T. et White M. — Information Management for Release-based Software Evolution Using EMMA, Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Matta N., Ribière M., Corby O., Définition d’un modèle de mémoire de projet, INRIA Report, N.3720, June, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Penalva J.M. — SAGACE, la modélisation des systèmes dont la maîtrise est complexe, ILCE, EC2 (Ed), Montpellier, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Poitou, J.P. — Documentation is Knowledge: An Anthropological Approach to Corporate Knowledge Management. Proceedings of ISMICK’95, Compiègne, France, 1995, p. 91–103.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Pomian J. — Mémoire d’entreprise, techniques et outils de la gestion du savoir. Ed Sapientia.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Ribière M. and Matta N. — Virtual Entreprise and Corporate Memory, Building, Maintaining and Using Organizational Memories, ECAI-98 Workshop, Brighton, August, 1998.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Ribière M. — Représentation et gestion de multiples points de vue dans le formalisme des graphes conceptuels, Rapport de thèse en Sciences, spécialité informatique, Avril 1999.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    H.A., Simon, “Administrative behavior: a study of the decison-making processes in administrative organization,” The MacMillan Cy, New York, 3rd edition, 1977.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Tourtier P.A. — Analyse préliminaire des métiers et de leurs interactions. Rapport intermédiaire, projet GENIE, INRIA-Dassault-Aviation, 1995.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Van Heijst G., Schreiber A. Wielinga B., Using Explicit Ontologies in KBS Development. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, Vol. 46,1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nada Matta
    • 1
  • Myriam Ribière
    • 2
  • Olivier Corby
    • 3
  • Myriam Lewkowicz
    • 1
  • Manuel Zacklad
    • 1
  1. 1.UTT/Tech-CICOTroyes CedexFrance
  2. 2.SRI INternationalAI-Center - EJ213Menlo ParkUSA
  3. 3.INRIA-ACACIASophia-Antipolis cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations