A Learning Algorithm for Synfire Chains

  • Jacques Sougné
Part of the Perspectives in Neural Computing book series (PERSPECT.NEURAL)


Neurobiological studies indicate very precise temporal behavior of neuron firings. Abeles [1] has recorded spike timing of different cortical cells and, in particular, has observed the following level of precision: when a neuron A frres, neuron B would frre 151ms later and neuron C would fire precisely 289ms after that—with aprecision across trials of 1 ms! Such long delays require dozens of combined transmission delays from the presynaptic neuron (A) to the postsynaptic neuron (C). The mechanism proposed by Abeles for generating such precise delayed synchronization has been called synfire chains. How could synfire chains develop? What learning procedure could generate such precise temporal chains? How could a connectionist network of spiking neurons leam synfrre chains? An algorithm for a network of spiking neurons that learns synfire chains will be presented.


Target Node Neuron Firing Postsynaptic Neuron Spike Timing Hebbian Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abeles, M (1991). Corticonics: Neural circuits of the cerebral cortex. New-York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abeles, M, Prut, Y., Bergman, H., Vaadia, E., & Aertsen, A. (1993). Integration, Synchronicity and Periodicity. In A. Aertsen (Ed.), Brain Theory: Spatio-Temporal Aspects of Brain Function (pp. 149–181). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bienenstock, E. (1995). A model of neocortex. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 6, 179–224.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calvin, W. H. (1983). A stone’s throwand its launch window: timing precision and its implications. Journal of TheoricalBiology, 104, 121–135.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engert, F., & Bonhoeffer, T. (1997). Synapse specificity of long-term potentiation breaks down at short distances. Nature, 388, 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    French, R. M (1997). Pseudo-recurrent connectionist networks: An approach to the’ sensitivity-stability’ dilemma. Connection Sdence, 9,353–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    French, R. M (1999). Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 128–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    French, RM., Ans, B., & Rousset, S. (2001). Pseudopatterns and dual-network: memory models: Advantages and shortcomings. In RM. French, & J.P. Sougne (Eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop: Evolution, Learning, and Development. London: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herrrnann, M, Hertz, J.A., & Pügel-Bennet, A. (1995). Analysis of Synfire Chains. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 6, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hertz, J.A., & Pügel-Bennet, A. (1996). Learning synfire chains by self organazation. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 7,357–363.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Levy, N., & Horn, D. (1999). Distributed synchrony in a Hebbian cell assembly of spiking neurons. In Advances in Neural Irifonnation Processing Systems 11, Cambridge Ma, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maass, W., & Bishop, C.M (1999). Pulsed Neural Networks. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Markram, H., Lübke, J., Frotscher, M, & Sakmann, B. (1997). Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by coincidence ofPostsynaptic Aps and EPSPs. Science, 275, 213–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Markram, H., Gupta, A., Uziel, A., Wang, Y., & Tsodyks, M (1998). Information processing with frequency-dependent synaptic connections. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 70, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Munro, P., & Hemandez, G. (1999) LTD facilitates learning in anoisy environment. In Advances in Neural Irifonnation Processing Systems 11, Cambridge Ma, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prot, Y., Vaadia, E., Bergman, H., Haalman, I., Siovin, H., & Abeles, M. (1998). Spatiotemporal structure of cortical activity: Properties and behavioral relevance. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 2857–2874.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sougné, J. P. (1996). A Connectionist Model of Reflective Reasoning Using Temporal Properties of Node Fning. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Sdence (pp. 666–671). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sougné, J. P. (1998). Connectionism and the problem of multiple instantiation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sougné, J. P. (1999). INFERNET: A neurocomputational model of binding and inference. Doctoral dissertation, Universiré de Liège.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sterratt, D. C. (1999). Is biological temporallearning rule compatible with learning synfire chains? Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Artijicial Neural Networks.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang, L.I., Tao, H.W., Holt, C.E., Harris, W., & Poo, M. (1998). A critica1 window for cooperation and competition among developing retinotectal synapses. Nature, 395, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacques Sougné

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations