Skip to main content

Modelling Cognitive Development with Constructivist Neural Networks

  • Conference paper
Connectionist Models of Learning, Development and Evolution

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Neural Computing ((PERSPECT.NEURAL))

Abstract

Based on recent evidence from cognitive developmental neuroscience, I argue for the importance of constructivist models of cognitive developmental phenomena. This point is empirically investigated with a constructivist neural network model of the acquisition of past tense/particip1e inflections. The model dynamically adapts its architecture to the leaming task by growing units and connections in a task-specific way during learning. In contrast to other, fixed-architecture models, the constructivist network displays a realistic, U-shaped leaming behaviour. In the trained network, realistic “adult” representations emerge that lead to aphasia-like dissociations between regular and irregular forms when the model is lesioned. These results show that constructivist neural networks form valid models of cognitive developmental processes and that they avoid many of the problems of fixed-architecture models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baayen, H., Piepenbrock, R., van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX Lexical Database. CD-ROM. Linguistic Data Consortium. University of Pennsylvania, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(6), 991–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, L., Celnik, P., Pascual-Leone, A., Corwell, B., Falz, L., Dambrosia, J., Honda, M., Sadato, N., Gerloff, C., Catalá, M., Hallett, M. (1997). Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans. Nature, 389, 180–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Daugherty, K. Seidenberg, M. S. (1992). Rules or connections? The past tense revisited. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edelman, G. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fahlman, S. E. (1989). Faster-Iearning variations on back-propagation: An empirical study. Proceedings of the 1988 Connectionist Models Summer School. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greenough, W., Larson, J., Withers, G. (1985). Effects of unilateral and bilateral training in a reaching task on dendritic branching of neurons in the rat motorsensory forelimb cortex. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 44,301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kenny, P. Turkewitz, G. (1986). Effects of unusually early visual stimulation on the development of homing behavior in the rat pup. Developmental Psychobiology, 19(1), 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ling, C. X. Marinov, M. (1993). Answering the connectionist challenge: A symbolic model of learning the past tenses of English verbs. Cognition, 49, 235–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. MacWhinney, B. Leinbach, J. (1991). Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb leaming model. Cognition, 40, 121–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marcus, G., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., Pinker, S. (1995). German inftection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marcus, G. E, Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. J., Xu, E (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial No. 228, Vol. 57, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Penke, M., Janssen, U., Krause, M. (1999). The representation of inftectional morphology: Evidence from Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 68, 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253, 530–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Plunkett, K. Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48, 21–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Prasada, S. Pinker, S. (1993). Generalization ofregular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(1), 1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Quartz, S. R. Sejnowski, T. J. (1997). The neural basis of cognitive development: A constructivist manifesto. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 537–596.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rumelhart, D. E. McClelland, J. L. (1986). On leaming past tenses of English Verbs. In: David E. Rumelhart and James L. McClelland (eds.) Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 216–271.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Ibafiez, V., Deiber, M., Dold, G., Hallett, M. (1996). Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature, 380, 526–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Turkewitz, G. Kenny, P. A. (1982). Limitations on input as a basis for neural organization and perceptual development: A preliminary theoretical statement. Developmental Psychobiology, 15, 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Westermann, G. (2000). A constructivist dual-representation model of verb inftection. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conlerence 01 the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Westermann, G. (2000). Constructivist Neural Network Models of Cognitive Development, PhD thesis, Division of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Westermann, G. Goebel, R. (1995). Connectionist rules of language. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conlerence of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Westermann, G. (2001). Modelling Cognitive Development with Constructivist Neural Networks. In: French, R.M., Sougné, J.P. (eds) Connectionist Models of Learning, Development and Evolution. Perspectives in Neural Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0281-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0281-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-354-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0281-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics