Summary
Relative chronology building is an essential part of chronology construction in archaeology. Whilst Chapters 1, 2, 3, 5 and 11 use relative chronological information in statistical analyses of dates assuming that it is reliable, this chapter considers relative dating evidence and the uncertainty associated with it in more detail. At most archaeological sites a formal treatment of the relative chronological evidence is first and foremost associated with stratigraphy which is represented using the Harris matrix, but the relative chronological evidence uncovered at excavations includes a much broader range of observations. These observations are often characterized by uncertainty or ambiguity as regards their temporal implications The first part of this chapter considers different approaches in the use of relative chronology at excavations and, subsequently, a proposal is outlined for a new procedure. The procedure involves four elements: a system of description enabling the formal representation of the information, an outline of a database structure capable of handling the complexity and the dynamic properties of the data, a method of analysis, and finally some considerations on the interpretative use of the analytical results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barker, P. (1993). Techniques of archaeological excavation. Batsford, London, third edn.
Gardin, J.-C. (1980). Archaeological constructs: an aspect of theoretical archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Graslund, B. (1974). Relativ datering: Om kronlogisk metod i nordisk arkeologi. Bibliotek “TOR”. Inst. f. arkeologi, sarskilt nordeuropeisk, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
Griislund, B. (1987). The birth of prehistoric chronology: dating methods and dating systems in nineteenth-century Scandinavian archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Harris, E. C. (1975). The stratigraphic sequence: a question of time. World Archaeology, 7, 109-121.
Harris, E. C. (1989). Principles of archaeological stratigraphy. Academic Press, London, second edn.
Harris, E. C., Brown, M. R., III and Brown, G. J. (eds.) (1993). Practices of archaeological stratigraphy. Academic Press, London.
Herzog, 1. (1993). Computer-aided Harris matrix generation. In E. C. Harris, M. R. Brown, III and G. J. Brown (eds.), Practices of archaeological stratigraphy, Academic Press, London, 201-217.
Hodder, 1. (1997). ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible’: towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity, 71, 691-700.
Hodder, 1. (1999). The archaeological process: an introduction. Blackwell, Oxford.
Holst, M. K. (1999). The dynamic of the Iron-age village: a technique for the relative-chronological analysis of area-excavated Iron-age settlements. Journal of Danish Archaeology, 13,95-119.
Holst, M. K. (2001). Formalizing fact and fiction in four dimensions: a relational description of temporal structures in settlements. In Z. Stancic and T. Veljanovski (eds.), Computing archaeology for understanding the past. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford, International Series, 5931, 159163.
Hvass, S. (1979). Die volkerwanderungszeitliche Siedlung Vorbasse, Mitteljiitland. Acta Archaeologica, 49, 61-111.
Hvass, S. (1985). Hodde, et vestjysk landsbysamfund fra celdre jernalder. Arkzeologiske Studier, vol. VII. Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen.
Madsen, T. (1995). Archaeology between facts and fiction: the need for an explicit methodology. In M. Kuna and N. Venclova (eds.), Whither ar6 Complicated Relations and Blind Dating 147 chaeology: papers in honour of Evzen Neustupny, Institute of Archaeology, Praha, 125-144.
Madsen, T. (1999). Coping with complexity: towards a formalised methodology of contextual archaeology. Archeologia e Calcolatori, 10,125-144.
Madsen, T. (2001). Transforming diversity into uniformity: experiments with meta-structures for database recording. In Z. Stancic and T. Veljanovski (eds.), Computing archaeology for understanding the past. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford, International Series, 8931, 101-105.
Renfrew, C. and Bahn, P. (1991). Archaeology: theories methods and practice. Thames and Hudson, London.
Sharon, I. (1995a). Models for stratigraphic analysis of tell sites. Ph.D. thesis, Hebrew University, Israel.
Sharon, I. (1995b). Partial order scalogram analysis of relations - a mathematical approach to the analysis of stratigraphy. Journal of Archaeologica Science, 22, 751-767.
Simmons, D. M., Stachiw, M. O. and Worrell, J. E. (1993). The total site matrix: strata and structure at the Bixby Site. In E. C. Harris, M. R. Brown, III and G. J. Brown (eds.), Practices of archaeological stratigraphy, Academic Press, London, 181-197.
Trigger, B. G. (1989). A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge University Pr ess, Cambridge.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holst, M.K. (2004). Complicated Relations and Blind Dating: Formal Analysis of Relative Chronological Structures . In: Buck, C.E., Millard, A.R. (eds) Tools for Constructing Chronologies. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 177. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0231-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0231-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-763-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0231-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive