Neural Nets WIRN Vietri-01 pp 23-59 | Cite as

# Neurofuzzy Approximator based on Mamdani’s Model

## Abstract

Neurofuzzy approximators can take on numerous alternatives, as a consequence of the large body of options available for defining their basic operations. In particular, the extraction of the rules from numerical data can be conveniently based on clustering algorithms. The large number of clustering algorithms introduces a further flexibility. Neurofuzzy approximators can treat both numerical and linguistic sources. The analysis of approximator sensitivity to the previous factors is important in order to decide the best solution in actual applications. This task is carried out in the present paper by recurring to illustrative examples and exhaustive simulations. The results of the analysis are used for comparing different learning algorithms. The underlying approach to the determination of the optimal approximator architecture is constructive. This approach is not only very efficient, as suggested by learning theory, but it is also particularly suited to combat the effect of noise that can deteriorate the numerical data.

## Keywords

Numerical Data Input Space Linguistic Information Linguistic Rule Crisp Input## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- [1]E.H. Mamdani, “Applications of fuzzy, algorithms for simple dynamic plant”,
*Proc. IEE*, Vol. 121,No. 12,1974,pp. 1585–1588.Google Scholar - [2]T. Takagi, and M. Sugeno, “Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modelling and control”,
*IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.*, Vol. 15, 1985, pp. 116–132.MATHGoogle Scholar - [3]J.M. Mendel, “Fuzzy logic systems for engineering: a tutorial”,
*Proc. IEEE*, Vol. 83, No. 3,1995, pp. 345–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [4]L.X. Wang,
*Adaptive fuzzy systems and control*, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.Google Scholar - [5]J.S.R. Jang, C.T. Sun, and E. Mizutani,
*Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing*, Prentice-Hall, NJ, USA, 1997.Google Scholar - [6]G.A. Carpenter, S. Grossberg, et al., “Fuzzy ARTMAP: a neural network architecture for incremental supervised learning and analog multidimensional maps”,
*IEEE Trans, on Neural Networks*, Vol. 3, 1992, pp. 698–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [7]Ishibuchi, K. Kwon, and H. Tanaka, “Learning of fuzzy neural networks from fuzzy inputs and fuzzy targets”,
*Proc. of 5th IFSA World Conference*, Vol. I, 1993, pp. 147–150.Google Scholar - [8]C.T. Lin, “A neural fuzzy control system with structure and parameter learning”,
*Fuzzy Sets Syst.*, Vol. 70, 1995, pp. 183–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [9]I. Rojas, H. Pomares, J. Ortega, and A. Prieto, “Self-organized fuzzy system generation from training examples”,
*IEEE Trans, on Fuzzy Systems*, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2000, pp. 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [10]Y.Q. Zhang, and A. Kandel, “Compensatory neurofuzzy systems with fast learning algorithms”,
*IEEE Trans, on Neural Networks*, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1998, pp. 83–105.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [11]J.C. Bezdeck,
*Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms*, Plenum Press, New York, 1981.Google Scholar - [12]P.K. Simpson, “Fuzzy min-max neural networks-Part. 2: clustering”,
*IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Syst.*, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1993, pp. 32–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [13]F.M. Frattale Mascioli, A. Mancini, A. Rizzi, and G. Martinelli, “Function approximation with noisy training data using FBF neural networks”,
*Proc. Of NC’98*, Vienna, Sept. 1998, pp. 900–906.Google Scholar - [14]V.N. Vapnik,
*The nature of statistical learning theory*, Springer-Verlag, 1995.MATHGoogle Scholar - [15]J. Rissanen, ‘Modelling by shortest data description”,
*Automatica*, Vol. 14, 1978, pp. 465–471.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - [16]S. Amari, et al., “Asymptotic statistical theory of overtraining and cross-validation”,
*IEEE Trans, on Neural Networks*, Vol. 8, No. 5,1997, pp. 985–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [17]G.C. Mouzouris, and J.M. Mendel, “Nonsingleton fuzzy logic systems: theory and application”,
*IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems*, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1997, pp. 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [18]M.H. Hassoun,
*Fundamentals of artificial neural networks*, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1996.Google Scholar - [19]Poggio, and F. Girosi, “Networks for approximation and learning”,
*Proc. Of IEEE*, Vol. 78, Sept. 1990, pp. 1481–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [20]L.X. Wang, and J.M. Mendel, “Fuzzy basis functions, universal approximation and orthogonal least squares learning”,
*IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks*, Vol. 3, No. 5,1992, pp. 807–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [21]A. Mancini, F.M. Frattale Mascioli, A. Rizzi, and G. Martinelli, “Improving FBF neurofuzzy approximator by optimised input space covering”,
*Electronics Letters*, Vol. 35, No. 4, 18 Feb. 1999, pp. 312–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [22]T. Kohonen,
*Self-organizing maps*, Springer, 1995.Google Scholar - [23]T. Kohonen, E. Oja, O. Simula, A. Visa, and J. Kangas, “Engineering applications of the self-organizing maps”,
*Proc. of IEEE*; October 1996, pp. 1358–1384.Google Scholar - [24]F.M. Frattale Mascioli, A. Rizzi, G. Scrocca, and G. Martinelli, “Scale-based clustering via gravitational law imitation”,
*WIRN-99*, Springer, 1999, pp. 256–265.Google Scholar - [25]F.M. Frattale Mascioli, A. Rizzi, and G. Martinelli, “Compactness-separability optimization of fuzzy clusters”,
*Proc. of ISIS’97*, Reggio Calabria, Italy, Sept. 1997, pp. 452–457.Google Scholar - [26]F.M. Frattale Mascioli, A. Rizzi, M. Panella, and G. Martinelli, “Clustering with uncostrained hyperboxes”,
*IEEE Int. Fuzzy Systems Conference*, Seoul, Korea, August 1999, Vol. II, pp. 1075–1080.Google Scholar