Skip to main content

Evaluating Networked Learning: Developing A Multi-Disciplinary, Multi-Method Approach

  • Chapter
Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues

Part of the book series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work ((CSCW))

Abstract

There has been considerable interest and activity throughout the last decade in the design and implementation of networked learning initiatives in higher education. Many of these initiatives have been evaluated subsequently at institutional or consortial/regional level and the findings disseminated. It is more unusual however to find evaluation of networked learning innovation being undertaken at sectoral level on a nationwide basis. This chapter charts the development and outlines the key characteristics of a research methodology for evaluating large-scale networked learning initiatives. The methodology was developed, and subsequently refined and adapted, through a series of evaluative research commissions undertaken by the Learning Technology in Higher Education (LTHE) Research Group in the Department of Higher and Community Education at the University of Edinburgh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, C., Day, K., Haywood, J., Land, R. & Macleod, H. (1999a) Use of TLTP materials in UK Higher Education, HEFCE Report June 99/39. Higher Education Funding Council for England, Bristol. http://www.flp.ed.ac.uk/LTRG/TLTP.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., Day, K., Haywood, J., Land, R. & Macleod, H. (1999b) Going with the grain? Issues in the evaluation of educational innovations. Paper presented at the European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), 24–28 August, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., Day, K., Haywood, J., Land, R. & Macleod, H. (2000) ‘Mapping the territory: issues in evaluating large-scale learning technology initiatives’, Educational Technology & Society 3 (4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. & Dawson, R. (1999) Evaluation research: an introduction to principles, methods and practice. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T.D. & Reichardt, C.S. (1979) Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research, London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, K., Haywood, J. & Macleod, H. (1997) Evaluation of the Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative. Edinburgh: Scottish Higher Education Funding Council

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1983) Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E.R. (1993) Professional evaluation: social impact and political consequences. Newbury Park: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1988) Paradigms and pragmatism. In Fetterman, D.M. (Ed) Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: the silent scientific revolution. New York: Praeger, pp116–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd. Edition), Newbury Park: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H. & Freeman, H.F. (1993) Evaluation: a systematic approach (5th edition), London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W.R. & Epstein, L. (1987) Practice of program evaluation practice among members of the Evaluation Research Society and Evaluation Network. Evaluation Review, 11, pp55–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D.L. & Shinkfield, A.J. (1984) Systematic evaluation. Lancaster: Kluwer-Nijhoff

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trend, M.G. (1978) On the reconciliation of qualitative and quantitative analysis: a case study. Human Organization, 37, pp34–54. Reprinted in Cook, T.D. & Reichardt, C.S. (Eds) (1979) Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research, London: Sage 193–193

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, C., Day, K., Haywood, D., Haywood, J., Land, R., Macleod, H. (2002). Evaluating Networked Learning: Developing A Multi-Disciplinary, Multi-Method Approach. In: Steeples, C., Jones, C. (eds) Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0181-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0181-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-471-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0181-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics