Abstract
There has been considerable interest and activity throughout the last decade in the design and implementation of networked learning initiatives in higher education. Many of these initiatives have been evaluated subsequently at institutional or consortial/regional level and the findings disseminated. It is more unusual however to find evaluation of networked learning innovation being undertaken at sectoral level on a nationwide basis. This chapter charts the development and outlines the key characteristics of a research methodology for evaluating large-scale networked learning initiatives. The methodology was developed, and subsequently refined and adapted, through a series of evaluative research commissions undertaken by the Learning Technology in Higher Education (LTHE) Research Group in the Department of Higher and Community Education at the University of Edinburgh.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, C., Day, K., Haywood, J., Land, R. & Macleod, H. (1999a) Use of TLTP materials in UK Higher Education, HEFCE Report June 99/39. Higher Education Funding Council for England, Bristol. http://www.flp.ed.ac.uk/LTRG/TLTP.html
Anderson, C., Day, K., Haywood, J., Land, R. & Macleod, H. (1999b) Going with the grain? Issues in the evaluation of educational innovations. Paper presented at the European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), 24–28 August, Gothenburg, Sweden
Anderson, C., Day, K., Haywood, J., Land, R. & Macleod, H. (2000) ‘Mapping the territory: issues in evaluating large-scale learning technology initiatives’, Educational Technology & Society 3 (4)
Clarke, A. & Dawson, R. (1999) Evaluation research: an introduction to principles, methods and practice. London: Sage
Cook, T.D. & Reichardt, C.S. (1979) Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research, London: Sage
Day, K., Haywood, J. & Macleod, H. (1997) Evaluation of the Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative. Edinburgh: Scottish Higher Education Funding Council
Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1983) Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey Bass
House, E.R. (1993) Professional evaluation: social impact and political consequences. Newbury Park: Sage
Patton, M.Q. (1988) Paradigms and pragmatism. In Fetterman, D.M. (Ed) Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: the silent scientific revolution. New York: Praeger, pp116–137
Patton, M.Q. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd. Edition), Newbury Park: Sage
Rossi, P.H. & Freeman, H.F. (1993) Evaluation: a systematic approach (5th edition), London: Sage
Shadish, W.R. & Epstein, L. (1987) Practice of program evaluation practice among members of the Evaluation Research Society and Evaluation Network. Evaluation Review, 11, pp55–90
Stufflebeam, D.L. & Shinkfield, A.J. (1984) Systematic evaluation. Lancaster: Kluwer-Nijhoff
Trend, M.G. (1978) On the reconciliation of qualitative and quantitative analysis: a case study. Human Organization, 37, pp34–54. Reprinted in Cook, T.D. & Reichardt, C.S. (Eds) (1979) Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research, London: Sage 193–193
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anderson, C., Day, K., Haywood, D., Haywood, J., Land, R., Macleod, H. (2002). Evaluating Networked Learning: Developing A Multi-Disciplinary, Multi-Method Approach. In: Steeples, C., Jones, C. (eds) Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0181-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0181-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-471-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0181-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive