Skip to main content

A Review of the Use of Asynchronous E-Seminars in Undergraduate Education

  • Chapter
The Digital University — Building a Learning Community

Part of the book series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work ((CSCW))

  • 173 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will focus on the use of CMC systems to support electronic seminar (e-seminar)discussionsconducted asynchronously. Although synchronous e-seminars offer the opportunity to teach and learn at a distance, asynchronous e-seminars are not constrained by time and therefore a number of further benefits can be realized. The reported benefits arising from the use of asynchronous e-seminars will be discussed. These include:(i) enhanced student interaction fortraditional learners andimproved communication supportfor remote learners; (ii) critical reflection — leading to more informed contributions from students; (iii) enhanced team and communication skills, and (iv) access to new ideas, perspectives and cultures. A review of theliterature has identifieda number of issues which require further research. These include: (i) academic assessment of e-seminar discussions; (ii) student motivation, and (iii) the role of individual differences regarding student attitudes and use of e-seminars. These issues will be discussed and illustrated with reference to a number of e-seminar evaluations conducted by the author who has been using e-seminars withinundergraduate programmes for seven years. The chapter will conclude with a list of best practice guidelines to assist educators in the design and implementation of e-seminars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bearing, R. (1997) Higher Education in the Learning Society. The National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, Crown Copyright.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crook, C.(1994)ComputersandtheCollaborativeExperienceof Learning. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mason, R. & Bacsich, P. (1998) Embedding computer conferencing into university teaching. Computers & Education, 30(3/4), 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor, J. (1998) Using asynchronous computer-conferencing to encourage interaction in seminar discussion. The Digital University. Hazemi, R., Hailes, S. & Wilbur, S. (Eds.), Springer, 219–232.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duffy, C, Arnold, S. and Henderson, F. (1995) NetSem — electrifying undergraduate seminars. Active Learning. 2, 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Light, P., Nesbitt, E., Light, V. & White, S. (2000) Variety is the spice of life: Student use of CMC in the context of campus based study. Computers & Education, 34, 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hiltz, S. R. (1985) The Virtual Classroom: Initial Explorations of CMC Systems as an Interactive Learning Space. New Jersey Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Riel, M. (1993) Globaleducationthroughleaming circles. Global Networks: Computers and International Communication. Harasim, L. (Ed.), MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pickering, J. (1995) Teaching on the Internet is learning. Active Learning. 2, 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harvey, L. & Knight, P. (1996) Transforming Higher Education. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Newman, D. R., Johnson, C, Cochrane, C. and Webb, B. (1996) An experiment in group learning technology: Evaluating critical thinking in face-to-face and computer-supported seminars. Interpersonal Computing and Technology. 4, 1, 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S. and Sethna, B. N. (1991) The equalisation phenomenon. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Newman, D. R. (1994) Computer supported co-operative learning. Groupware in the 21st Century, Lloyd, P. (Ed.), Adamtine Press, 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scale, J. K. & Cann, A.J. (2000) Reflection on-line or off-line: The role of learning technologies in encouraging students to reflect. Computers & Education, 34, 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoare, R. M. and Race, W. P. (1990) Computer conferencing: Aversatilenew undergraduate learning process. University Computing, 12, 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson E. V. (2000). Student characteristics and computer-mediated communication. Computers & Education, 34, 61–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harasim, L. (1993) Global Networks: Computers and International Communication. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Browning, P. and Wilhams, J. (1995) The geology@bristol experience. Active Learning, 2, 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scale, J. K. (1997) Developing CBL packages: A reflective practice approach in scienceeducation. In Chapman, G., Proceedings of the3rd International CBL in Science Conference. Czech Republic: University of South Bohemia.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, J., Dineen, F. & McKendree, J. (1997) Supporting student discussions. Research on Educational Applicationsof Information Technologies. Darina, D. & Stanchev, I. (Eds.), VIRTECH Ltd., 124–136.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Biggs, J.B. (1979) Individualdifferences instudy processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education. 8, 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morgan, K. & Morgan, M. (2000) The role of personality factors in the design and use of collaborative tele-learning artifacts: An overview. Paper presented at The International Communication Association 2000 Conference. Acapulco, Mexico, June 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shaw, G. & Marlow, N. (2000) The role of student learning styles, gender, attitudes and perceptions on information andcommunicationtechnology assisted learning. Computers & Education, 34, 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Adrianson, L. and Hjelmquist, E. (1988) Users’ experiences of COM — A computer-mediated communication system. Behaviour and Information Technology. 1, 1, 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oxley, J. (1995) The Effects of CMC on Communication Apprehension. Unpublished undergraduate thesis. School of DEC, Boumemouth University.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor, J.(1995) Electronic Mail, Communication and Social Identity. Unpublished PhD thesis. Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Light, P., Colboum, C. & Light, V. (1997) Computer-mediated tutorial support for conventional university courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(4), 228–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Taylor, J. (2001) Approaches to studying and the perception of e-seminar discussions. Paper to be presentedat The 6th International Learning Styles Conference (ELSIN), Glamorgan, Wales, June 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, J. (2002). A Review of the Use of Asynchronous E-Seminars in Undergraduate Education. In: Hazemi, R., Hailes, S. (eds) The Digital University — Building a Learning Community. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0167-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0167-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-478-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0167-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics