Abstract
In the next three chapters, we will be assessing the HR program. There are many ways to do this, and deciding how to evaluate HR has been a major part of this research. We have adopted a shotgun approach [Bundy 98] whereby we perform many varied tests and apply different evaluation techniques in the hope that, taken together, they provide a fair evaluation. There are three main areas of assessment. In Chapter 12, we assess HR in terms of discovery tasks in mathematics. In Chapter 13, we compare HR with other programs which perform similar tasks. In this chapter, we assess HR’s theories and from this point, the word ‘theory’ will be used for the collection of examples, concepts, conjectures, theorems and proofs produced by HR in a particular session. This is not to be confused with the word ‘domain’ which describes an area of mathematics such as group theory or graph theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Colton, S. (2002). An Evaluation of HR’s Theories. In: Automated Theory Formation in Pure Mathematics. Distinguished Dissertations. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0147-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0147-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1113-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0147-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive