Advertisement

Profiling

  • Witold Abramowicz
  • Paweł Kalczyński
  • Krzysztof Węcel

Abstract

In its report on Internet services, Andersen Consulting claims that the value of information is hard to overestimate. Thus, providing high-quality and up-to-date information becomes a high-priority task in contemporary organizations. Financial services on the Web, analyzed by Andersen, offered information of more or less the same quality. The most important drawback of those services was that they did not offer profiling capabilities, namely the capabilities of creating personalized services.

Keywords

User Profile Data Warehouse Collaborative Filter Profile Server Context Query 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramowicz W, Kalczyfiski PJ, Wçcel K (2001) Information Filters Supplying Data Warehouses with Benchmarking Information. In: Abramowicz W, Zurada J (eds) Knowledge Discovery for Business Information Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  2. Abramowicz W, Kalczybski PJ, Wgcel K (200la) Profiling the Data Warehouse for Information Filtering. In: Mehdi Khosrowpour (ed) Managing Information Technology in a Global Economy, Proc of IRMA 2001, Toronto. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey London Melbourne Singapore, pp 810–814Google Scholar
  3. Abramowicz W, Wçcel K (2000) Building HyperSDI Profiles from Data Warehouse Metadata Repository. Proc of Conference on Integrated Systems KSW2000, Polish Academy of Sciences, System Researches, Vol. 26, Warsaw, pp 54–66Google Scholar
  4. Abramowicz W, Wçcel K (2001f) On Extracting Knowledge from the Data Warehouse for Information Filtering Purposes. In: Baborski AJ, Bonner RF, Owoc ML (eds) Knowledge Acquisition and Distributed Learning in Resolving Managerial Issues. Mälardalen University Press, Sweden, pp 156–172Google Scholar
  5. Allen RB (1990) User models: theory, method, and practice. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 32:511–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baeza-Yates R, Ribeiro-Neto B (1999) Modem Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley ACM Press New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Belkin NJ (2000) Helping People Find What They Don't Know. Communications of the ACM, August 2000, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp 58–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belkin NJ, Cool C, Head J, Jeng J, Kelly D, Lin S et al (1999) Relevance Feedback versus Local Context Analysis as Term Suggestion Devices: Rutgers' TREC-8 Interactive Track Experience. Proc of the 8th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-8). NIST Special PublicationGoogle Scholar
  9. Crouch CJ, Yang B (1992) Experiments in automatic statistical thesaurus construction. In: Proc of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 77–88Google Scholar
  10. Cyngil I, Dogac A, Azgin A (2000) A Broader Approach to Personalization. Communications of the ACM, August 2000, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp 136–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foskett DJ (1997) Thesaurus. In: Sparck-Jones K, Willet P (eds) Readings in Information Retrieval. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp 111–134Google Scholar
  12. Hirsh H, Basu C, Davison BD (2000) Learning to Personalize. Communications of the ACM, August 2000, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp 102–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lueg C, Pfeifer R (1997) Cognition, Situatedness, and Situated Design. In: Proc of 2nd International Conference on Cognitive Technology. Aizu, JapanGoogle Scholar
  14. Osterfelt S (2000) Business Intelligence: One Size Does Not Fit All. DM Review, February 2000,http://www.dmreview.com/
  15. Qiu Y, Frei HP (1993) Concept based query expansion. In: Proc of the 16th ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Pittsburgh, PA, pp 160–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rogers B (2000) Making Your Intranet. A Dynamic Knowledge Base. In: DM Review, 15 December 2000, http://www.dmreview.com/
  17. Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan J, Riedl J (2001) Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Algorithms. In: Proc. of the 10th World-Wide Web Conference, Hong-Kong, ACM. http://wwwl0.org/ Google Scholar
  18. Sprague RJ, Freudenreich LB (1978) Building Better SDI Profiles for Users of Large, Multidisciplinary Data Bases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, John Wiley & Sons, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp 278–282Google Scholar
  19. Wçcel K (2000) Odkrywanie wiedzy dla doskonalenia profili HyperSDI w hurtowniach danych (Knowledge Discovery for Improving HyperSDI Profiles in Data Warehouses). Master Thesis, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Economics, The Poznan University of Economics, Poznatí, Poland (in Polish)Google Scholar
  20. Wçcel K (2000b) Building HyperSDI Profiles from Data Warehouse Metadata Repository. In: Jane A (ed) Proc of Lubniewice 2000: Economy in Transition. Problems, ideas, solutions. Poznan University of Economics, Poznan, Poland, pp 232–241Google Scholar
  21. Wurman RS (2000) Redesign the Data Dump. Business 2.0, November 28, 2000Google Scholar
  22. Xu J (1997) Solving the Word Mismatch Problem Through Automatic Text Analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  23. Xu J, Croft WB (1996) Query Expansion Using Local and Global Document Analysis. In: Proc of the 19th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 96), Zurich, Switzerland, pp 4–11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Witold Abramowicz
    • 1
  • Paweł Kalczyński
    • 1
  • Krzysztof Węcel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceThe Poznań University of EconomicsPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations