Skip to main content

Making Evolutionary Design Optimisation Popular in Industry: Issues and Techniques

  • Chapter
Soft Computing and Industry

Abstract

The complexity and lack of systematic research in the field of real-life-engineering design optimisation has prevented the industry from exploiting its potential. The aim of this paper is to discuss the issues, and propose tools and techniques for making evolutionary design optimisation in industry. The paper begins by presenting the features of real-life design optimisation problems, and the current status of evolutionary design optimisation in industry. It further identifies the factors that inhibit the industrial applications of evolutionary-based optimisation algorithms, and proposes tools and techniques for addressing two of the main inhibitors: lack of robust optimisers and designer confidence. The paper presents an evolutionary-based algorithm that is developed by the authors for handling the complexity of real-life design optimisation problems. It also proposes a design model analysis tool for enhancing the confidence of designers in optimisation algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beasley, D., Bull, D. and Martin, R (1993). ‘An overview of genetic algorithms: part 2, research topics’.University computing, vol. 15, no. 4,170–181.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S. and Meyarivan, T. (2000).A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. KanGAL Report No. 200002, Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory (KanGAL), Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Kanpur.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Draper, N.R. and Smith, H. (1998).Applied regression analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, USA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Harik, G.R (1997).Learning gene linkage to efficiently solve problems of bounded difficulty using genetic algorithms. PhD. thesis, Computer science and engineering, University of Michigan, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Phadke, M.S. (1989). Quality engineering using robust design. Prentice-Hall International Inc., London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pohlheim, H. (1999). Visualization of evolutionary algorithms — Set of standard techniques and multidimensional visualization. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 1999), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rao, S.S. (1996).Engineering optimization — theory and practice. Wiley-Interscience, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reeves, C.R and Wright, C.C. (1995). An experimental design perspective on genetic algorithms. In: Whitley, D. and Vose, M. (eds.).Foundations of Genetic Algorithms (FOGA) III, Morgan Kaufmann, SanMateo, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roy, R (1997).Adaptive search and the preliminary design of gas turbine blade cooling system. PhD. dissertation, Engineering Design Centre (EDC), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roy, R, Jared, G., Tiwari, A. and Munaux, O. (2000).FLEXO — Project scope definition. Flexo Report — 1, SIMS, Cranfield University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roy, R, Jared, G., Tiwari, A. and Munaux, O. (2000). Design optimisation — a survey of industries. Flexo Report — 5, SIMS, Cranfield University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roy, R., Tiwari, A., Munaux, O. and Jared. G. (2000). Real-life engineering design optimisation: features and techniques. In: Martikainen, J. and Tanskanen, J. (eds.). CDROM Proceedings of the 5th online world conference on soft computing in industrial applications (WSC5) — ISBN 951-22-5205-8, IEEE, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Taguchi, G. (1987).System of experimental design. Clausing, D. (ed.), UNIPUB/Kraus International Publications, vol. 1 and 2, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tiwari, A., Roy, R., Jared, G. and Munaux, O. (2001). Interaction and multi-objective optimisation. In: Spector, L., Goodman, E., Wu, A., Langdon, W. B., Voigt, H.-M., Gen, M., Sen, S., Dorigo, M., Pezeshk, S., Garzon, M. and Burke, E. (eds.). Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2001), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, California, USA,671–678.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tiwari, A., Roy, R., Jared, G. and Munaux, O. (2001). Evolutionary-based Techniques for Real-life Optimisation: Development and Testing. Submitted to Applied Soft Computing (ASC) journal, Elsevier Science, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roy, R., Tiwari, A., Braneby, A. (2002). Making Evolutionary Design Optimisation Popular in Industry: Issues and Techniques. In: Roy, R., Köppen, M., Ovaska, S., Furuhashi, T., Hoffmann, F. (eds) Soft Computing and Industry. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0123-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0123-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1101-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0123-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics