Abstract
This chapter frames the ambitious agenda of Deutsch’s theory of psychological orientation and interdependence as a constructive response to the nature-nurture controversy in science and details it implications for situating our understanding of psychological phenomena within the context of a basic model of social relations. The theory’s utility is illustrated through its application to social conflict.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Other less basic dimensions of social relations identified in this research include enduring/ temporary, voluntary/involuntary, public/private, licit/illicit, and the number of people involved (Wish, Deutsch, & Kaplan, 1976).
- 2.
Other basic dimensions of social relations, such as task-oriented/social-emotional, formal/informal, licit/illicit, and so on, could also be integrated into the framework and seen as moderators or splitting parameters of the dynamics described here.
References
Alexander, M. G., Brewer, M. B., & Hermann, R. K. (1999). Images and affect: A functional analysis of out-group stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 78–93.
Allport, G. W. (1969). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, Chapter 1, pp. 1–80). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory-the skeleton of science. Management Science, 2, 197–208.
Boulding, K. E. (1959). National images and international systems. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3, 120–131.
Coleman, P. T., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Nowak, A., Vallacher, R., & Kugler, K. G. (Working paper). Getting down to basics: An integrative framework for conflict dynamics in social relations.
Coleman, P. T., & Kugler, K. G. (2010). Tracking adaptivity: Developing a measure to assess leader smart power in organizations. Unpublished Manuscript.
Coleman, P. T., Kugler, K., Musallam, N., Mitchinson, A., & Chung, C. (2010). The view from above and below: The effects of power asymmetries and interdependence on conflict dynamics and outcomes. Negotiation and Conflict Management Journal, 3, 283–311.
Coleman, P. T., Kugler, K. G., Mitchinson, A., & Foster, C. (working paper). Navigating power and conflict at work: The effects of power asymmetries and Interdependence on conflict in organizations. Unpublished manuscript.
Coleman, P. T., Mitchinson, A., & Kugler, K. G. (2010). Conflict, power and leadership: The value of adaptivity over the long-haul. Unpublished manuscript.
Curhan, J. R., Neale, M. A., Ross, L., & Rosencranz-Engelmann, J. (2008). Relational accommodation in negotiation: Effects of egalitarianism and gender on economic efficiency and relational capital. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107(2), 192–205.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.
Deising, P. (1962). Reason in society: Five types of decisions and their social conditions. Urbana; IL: University of Illinois Press.
Depret, E. F., & Fiske, S. T. (1993). Social cognition and power: Some cognitive consequences of social structure as a source of control deprivation. In G. Weary, F. Gleicher, & K. Marsh (Eds.), Control motivation and social cognition (pp. 176–202). New York: Springer.
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Deutsch, M. (1982). Interdependence and psychological orientation. In V. Derlega & J. L. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior: Theories and research (pp. 15–36). Orlando, FL: Academic.
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Deutsch, M. (2007). Two important but neglected ideas for social psychology as they relate to social justice. Paper presented at the Conference on Social Justice, New York, NY, April 2007.
Deutsch, M. (in press). A theory of cooperation and competition and beyond. In A. E. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Theory in social psychology.
Fiske, S. T., & Berdahl, J. (2007). Social power. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 678–692). New York: Guilford.
Kelley, H. H. (1979). Personal relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kelley, H. H. (1984). The theoretical description of interdependence by means of transitions lists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 956–982.
Kelley, H. H. (1991). Lewin, situations, and interdependence. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 211–233.
Kelley, H. H. (1997). The “stimulus field” for interpersonal phenomena: The source of language and thought about interpersonal events. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 140–169.
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
Kugler K. G., & Coleman, P. T. (2010). Independence, conflict and autonomy: An experimental study. Unpublished Manuscript.
Lewicki, R., Saunders D. M., & Minton, J. W. (Eds.). (1999). Individual differences. In Negotiation, (3rd ed., pp. 353–378). Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper.
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398.
Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Ed.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mischel, W. (1981). Current issues and challenges in personality. In Ludy Benjamin Jr. (Ed.), The G. Stanley Hall lecture series (Vol. 1., pp. 85–99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Ross, E. A. (1908). Social psychology. New York: Macmillan.
Rouhana, N. N., & Fiske, S. T. (1995). Perception of power, threat and conflict intensity in asymmetric intergroup conflict: Arab and Jewish citizens of Israel. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 49–81.
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
Triandis, H. C. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (2007). Dynamical social psychology: Finding order in the flow of human experience. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 734–758). New York: Guilford Publications.
Vallacher, R. R., Read, S. J., & Nowak, A. (Eds.). (2002). The dynamical perspective in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6 (special issue).
Van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., DeBruin, E. M. N., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733–746.
Wish, M., Deutsch, M., & Kaplan, S. J. (1976). Perceived dimensions of interpersonal relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 409–420.
Zartman, I. W., & Rubin, J. Z. (2002). Power and negotiation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coleman, P.T., Vallacher, R.R., Nowak, A. (2011). Tackling the Great Debate. In: Coleman, P. (eds) Conflict, Interdependence, and Justice. Peace Psychology Book Series, vol 11. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9994-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9994-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9993-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9994-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)