Abstract
Morton Deutsch (Social Justice Research, 19, 7–41, 2006) identifies “awakening a sense of injustice” as a necessary precursor of social change. Building on Deutsch’s theorizing, we propose that system justification, the motivation to defend and justify existing social, economic, and political institutions, and to derogate or dismiss alternatives to the status quo (Jost, Banaji, & Nosek, Political Psychology, 25, 881–920, 2004), operates as an obstacle to awakening the sense of injustice. In this chapter, we summarize recent research findings illustrating the soporific effects of system justification motivation, that is, the ways in which it inhibits the awakening of a sense of injustice. Furthermore, we observe that social change is most likely to be embraced when it is system-sanctioned and therefore imbued with the legitimacy of the overarching social system. Although disruptive social protest may sometimes be necessary, broad system-level changes may be more readily accomplished through interventions and appeals that do not directly challenge the status quo, but instead garner psychological support through their association with the current system.
This chapter is dedicated to one of our intellectual heroes, Morton Deutsch, who remains a strong role model for any social psychologist who is interested in the study and practice of social justice. For extremely useful comments on an earlier draft of this chapter, we thank Rachel Arnett, Aleksandra Cichocka, Erin Hennes, Anesu Mandisodza, Natasza Marrouch, Andrew Shipley, Caroline Wilmuth, and Jesse Wynhausen. Funding was provided in part by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and New York University.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashburn-Nardo, L., Knowles, M. L., & Monteith, M. J. (2003). Black Americans’ implicit racial associations and their implications for intergroup judgment. Social Cognition, 21, 61–87.
Biko, S. (1978). I write what I like. New York: Harper and Row.
Boll, T., Ferring, D., & Filipp, S. (2005). Effects of parental differential treatment on relationship quality with siblings and parents: Justice evaluations as mediators. Social Justice Research, 18, 155–182.
Calogero, R. M., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 211–228.
Christopher, K. P., England, K., Phillips, R., & Smeeding, T. M. (2002). The gender gap in poverty in modern nations: Single motherhood, the market, and the state. Sociological Perspectives, 45, 219–242.
Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.
Dasgupta, N. (2004). Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Social Justice Research, 17, 143–169.
Deutsch, M. (1974). Awakening the sense of injustice. In M. Ross & M. Lerner (Eds.), The quest for justice (pp. 19–42). Canada: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Deutsch, M. (1999). A personal perspective on the development of social psychology in the twentieth century. In A. Rodrigues & R. V. Levine (Eds.), Reflections on 100 years of experimental social psychology (pp. 1–34). New York: Basic.
Deutsch, M. (2006). A framework for thinking about oppression and its change. Social Justice Research, 19, 7–41.
Deutsch, M., & Steil, J. M. (1988). Awakening the sense of injustice. Social Justice Research, 2, 3–23.
Diekman, A. B., & Goodfriend, W. (2007). The good and bad of social change: Ambivalence toward activist groups. Social Justice Research, 20, 401–417.
Dubé, L., & Guimond, S. (1986). Relative deprivation and social protest. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 201–216). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.
Eidelman, S., Crandall, C. S., & Pattershall, J. (2009). The existence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 765–775.
Elias, N. (1994). The civilizing process (Revised edition). Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1939).
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 326–338.
Fine, M. (1979). Options to injustice: Seeing other lights. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 10, 61–76.
Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T-A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., and Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.
Freud, A. (1937). The ego and the mechanisms of defense. London: Hogarth.
Friesen, J. P., Gaucher, D., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Justifying more equitable social arrangements. Unpublished data, University of Waterloo, Ontario.
Gaucher, D., Chua, S., & Kay, A. C. (2008). Contentment with the status quo and activist behavior. Unpublished data, University of Waterloo, Ontario.
Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Justifying system-sanctioned public policy. Unpublished data, University of Waterloo, Ontario.
Guimond, S., & Dambrun, M. (2002). When prosperity breeds intergroup hostility: The effects of relative deprivation and relative gratification on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 900–912.
Gurr, T. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Harvey, J. (1999). Civilized oppression. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Henry, P. J., & Saul, A. (2006). The development of system justification in the developing world. Social Justice Research, 19, 365–378.
Hochschild, J. (1981). What’s fair? American beliefs about distributive justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Isaacs S. L., & Schroeder, S. A. (2004) Class: The ignored determinant of the nation’s health. The New England Journal of Medicine, 371, 1137–1142.
Johnson, C. (1966). Revolutionary change. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Jost, J. T. (1995). Negative illusions: Conceptual clarification and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness. Political Psychology, 16, 397–424.
Jost, J. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed-entitlement effect among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387–393.
Jost, J. T. (2011). System justification theory as compliment, complement, and corrective to theories of social identification and social dominance. In D. Dunning (Ed.), Social motivation (pp. 223–263). New York: Psychology Press.
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–920.
Jost, J. T., Burgess, D., & Mosso, C. O. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In J. T. Jost, & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 363–388). New York: Cambridge.
Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265.
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Social justice: History, theory, and research. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1122–1165). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Jost, J. T., Kivetz, Y., Rubini, M., Guermandi, G., & Mosso, C. (2005). System-justifying functions of complementary regional and ethnic stereotypes: Cross-national evidence. Social Justice Research, 18, 305–333.
Jost, J. T., Ledgerwood, A., & Hardin, C. D. (2008). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational basis of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 171–186.
Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., van der Toorn, J., Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A. N., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). System justification: How do we know it’s motivated? In R. Bobocel et al. (Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 11, pp. 173–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychology Science, 3, 126–136.
Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36.
Jost, J. T., Pietrzak, J., Liviaton, I., Mandisodza, A. N., & Napier, J. L. (2008). System justification as conscious and unconscious goal pursuit. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 591–605). New York: Guilford.
Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.
Jost, J. T., & Van der Toorn, J. (2011). System justification theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology. London: Sage.
Kaiser, C. R., Dyrenforth, P. S., & Hagiwara, N. (2006). Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system- and group-justifying motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1523–1536.
Kaiser, C. R., Eccleston, C. P., & Hagiwara, N. (2008). Post-Hurricane Katrina racialized explanations as a system threat: Implications for whites’ and blacks’ racial attitudes. Social Justice Research, 21, 192–203.
Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254–263.
Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2003). Derogating the victim: The interpersonal consequences of blaming events on discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 227–237.
Kaiser, C. R., & Pratt-Hyatt, J. S. (2009). Distributing prejudice unequally: Do Whites direct their prejudice toward strongly identified minorities? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 432–445.
Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Laurin, K., Friesen, J., Zanna, M. P., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421–434.
Kay, A. C., Jimenez, M. C., & Jost, J. T. (2002). Sour grapes, sweet lemons, and the anticipatory rationalization of the status quo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1300–1312.
Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837.
Kluegel, J. R., Mason, D. S., & Wegener, B. (1995). Social justice and political change: Public opinion in capitalist and post-communist states. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “seizing” and “freezing.” Psychological Review, 103, 263–283.
Lane, R. E. (1962). Political ideology: Why the common man believes what he does. New York: Free Press.
Leach, C. W., Snider, N., & Iyer, A. (2002). “Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate”: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 136–163). New York: Cambridge.
Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A., Jost, J. T., & Pohl, M. J. (2011). Working for the system: Motivated defense of meritocratic beliefs. Social Cognition, forthcoming.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
Lewin, K. (1935). Psychosociological problems of a minority group. Character and Personality, 3, 175–187.
Lewin, K. (1951). Problems of research in social psychology. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin (pp. 155–169). New York: Harper. (Original work published 1944).
Liviatan, I., & Jost, J. T. (2010). A social-cognitive analysis of system justification goal striving. Unpublished Manuscript, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 293–355). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Major, B., McFarlin, D. B., & Gagnon, D. (1984). Overworked and underpaid: On the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1399–1412.
Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313–344.
Moshinsky, A., & Bar-Hillel, M. (2010). Loss aversion and status quo label bias. Social Cognition, 28, 191–204.
O’Brien, L. T., & Major, B. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718–1729.
O’Brien, L. T., & Major, B. (2009). Group status and feelings of personal entitlement: The roles of social comparison and system-justifying beliefs. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.) Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 427–443). New York: Oxford.
Pelham, B. W., & Hetts, J. J. (2001). Underworked and overpaid: Elevated entitlement in men’s self-pay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 93–103.
Reicher, S. (2004). The context of social identity: Domination, resistance, and change. Political Psychology, 25, 921–945.
Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (2004). Social identity, system justification, and social dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al. Political Psychology, 25, 823–844.
Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157–176.
Rudman, L. A., Feinberg, J., & Fairchild, K. (2002). Minority members’ implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cognition, 20, 294–320.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.
Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skocpol, T. (1994). Social revolutions in the modern world. New York: Cambridge.
Stapel, D. A., & Noordewier, M. K. (2011). The mental roots of system justification: System threat, need for structure, and stereotyping. Social Cognition, forthcoming.
Thorisdottir, H., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Motivated closed-mindedness mediates the effect of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology, forthcoming.
Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, vols. 1 and 2 (4th ed., pp. 595–629). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Uhlmann, E., Dasgupta, N., Elgueta, A., Greenwald, A. G., & Swanson, J. (2002). Subgroup prejudice based on skin color among Hispanics in the United States and Latin America. Social Cognition, 20, 198–226.
Van der Toorn, J., Tyler, T. R., & Jost, J. T. (2011). More than fair: Outcome dependence, system justification, and the perceived legitimacy of authority figures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 127–138.
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535.
Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R., & Chen, E. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267–274.
Walker, I., & Smith, H. J. (Eds.). (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Yeung, A. & Kay, A.C. (2007). The “F” word: System justification and negative perceptions of feminists. Unpublished honors thesis, University of Waterloo, Ontario.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gaucher, D., Jost, J.T. (2011). Difficulties Awakening the Sense of Injustice and Overcoming Oppression: On the Soporific Effects of System Justification. In: Coleman, P. (eds) Conflict, Interdependence, and Justice. Peace Psychology Book Series, vol 11. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9994-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9994-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9993-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9994-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)