Instruments to measure human feet using Reverse Engineering techniques

  • A. Rao
  • V. Fontanari
  • I. Cristofolini
  • G. De Monte
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

This study represents a preliminary activity for the biomechanical numerical modeling aimed at the prediction of the human foot behavior and the deformation under different load conditions. It also represents the starting point to develop a scientific approach for the functional mass customization aimed at the optimization of comfort in footwear. Reverse Engineering (RE) methodologies developed for building up the external shape of the human foot are presented and discussed. Aim of this work is to study the problem of the digitalization of human feet under different conditions using three technologies: shape from stereo, from silhouette and from shading. The foot is one of the most difficult human parts to reconstruct taking into account the complex surface and the high curvature. In this article the disadvantage and advantage of each technique are analyzed. In particular tests about reliability and precision of the measure are considered.

Keywords

Europe Foam Shoe 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Lerch, M. Mac Gillivray, and T. Domina, "3D Laser Scanning: A Model of Multidisciplinary Research," JTATM, vol. 5, 2006.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang J, Zheng G (Apr 2009) Reverse engineering and rapid prototyping technique for restoration of mandibular bone defect. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi 26:440–2Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Popov I, Onuh SO (2009) Reverse engineering of pelvic bone for hip joint replacement. J Med Eng Technol 33:454–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Zhang, J. Yao, X. Wei, F. Pei, and Z. Zhou, "Research on point cloud smoothing in knee joint prosthesis modeling based on reverse engineering" Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi, vol. 25, pp. 1009-13, 1020, Oct 2008.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tang ZL, Wang X, Yi B (2008) Reverse-engineering-based quantitative three-dimensional measurement of facial swelling after administration of Yunnan Baiyao following orthognathic surgery. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 88:2482–6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chantarapanich N, Sitthiseripratip K, Mahaisavariya B, Wongcumchang M, Siribodhi P (Sep 2008) 3D geometrical assessment of femoral curvature: a reverse engineering technique. J Med Assoc Thai 91:1377–81Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin YP, Wang CT, Dai KR (Mar 2005) Reverse engineering in CAD model reconstruction of customized artificial joint. Med Eng Phys 27:189–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mahaisavariya B, Sitthiseripratip K, Tongdee T, Bohez EL, Vander Sloten J, Oris P (Nov 2002) Morphological study of the proximal femur: a new method of geometrical assessment using 3- dimensional reverse engineering. Med Eng Phys 24:617–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. D'Apuzzo, "Overview of 3D surface digitalisation technologies in Europe," Three- Dimentional Image Capture and Applications VI, Proc. of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imagin, SPIE, vol. 6056, 2006.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luximon A, Goonetilleke RS, Zhang M (2005) 3D foot shape generation from 2D information. Ergonomics 48:625–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Witana CP, Feng J, Goonetilleke RS (2004) Dimensional differences for evaluating the quality of footwear fit. Ergonomics 47:1301–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wunderlich RE, Cavanagh PR (Apr 2001) Gender differences in adult foot shape: implications for shoe design. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:605–11Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Witana CP, Xiong S, Zhao J, Goonetilleke RS (2006) Foot measurements from threedimensional scans: A comparison and evaluation of different methods. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 36:789–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xiong S, Goonetilleke RS, Zhao J, Li W, Witana CP (2009) Foot deformations under different load-bearing conditions and their relationships to stature and body weight. ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENCE 117:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. S. Goonetilleke, C. P. Witana, J. Zhao, and S. Xiong, "The Pluses and Minuses of Obtaining Measurements from Digital Scans," V.G. Duffy (Ed.): Digital Human Modeling, HCII 2009, LNCS 5620 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelber, pp. 681-690, 2009.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Forbes K, Nicolls F, De Jager G (2006) A Voigt, “Shape-from-silhouette with two mirrors and an uncalibrated camera”. Computer Vision, vol: 3952:165–178Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cremaschi A., Olivato P., Rao A. “Manufacturing upon knowledge: a new approach to engineering wearable products”, Procedings of Mass Customization & Personalization (MCPC 2007), Boston, 7th-10th October 2007.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ISO 10360-2, 2001. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate measuring machines (CMM) – Part 2: CMMs used for measuring sizeGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ISO 10360-4, 2000. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate measuring machines (CMM) – Part 4: CMMs used in scanning measuring modeGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    http://www.dea.it, accessed November 24th 2009Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. Mundermann, A. Mundermann, A. M. Chaudhari, T. P. Andriacchi, “Conditions that influence the accuracy of anthropometric parameter estimation for human body segments using shape-from-silhouette”, Procedings of Videometrics VIII, San Jose, CA, 18th January 2005Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Rao, “Ricostruzione della superficie esterna del piede mediante tecnica di stereo visione multipla”, Procedings of AIAS, Torino, 9 th -11 th September 2009Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yemez Y., Wetherilt C.J: A volumetric fusion technique for surface reconstruction from silhouettes and range data, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Volume: 105, Issue: 1, January, 2007, Pages. 30-41.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Rao
    • 1
  • V. Fontanari
    • 2
  • I. Cristofolini
    • 1
  • G. De Monte
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Structural EngineeringUniversity of TrentoTrentoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Materials Engineering and Industrial TechnologiesUniversity of TrentoTrentoItaly
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations