Nano-composite Sensors for Wide Range Measurement of Ligament Strain

  • Tommy Hyatt
  • David Fullwood
  • Rachel Bradshaw
  • Anton Bowden
  • Oliver Johnson
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

Biological tissues routinely experience large strains and undergo large deformations during normal physiologic activity. In order to quantify this strain, researchers often use optical marker tracking methods which are tedious and difficult. This paper investigates a new technique for quantifying large strain (up to 40%) by use of piezoresistive composite strain gages. The High Displacement Strain Gages (HDSGs) being investigated are manufactured by suspending nickel nanostrands within a biocompatible silicone matrix. The conductive nickel filaments come into progressively stronger electrical contact with each other as the HDSG is strained, thus reducing the electrical resistivity which is measured using conventional techniques. In the present work, HDSGs measured the strain of bovine ligament under prescribed loading conditions. Results demonstrated that HDSGs are an accurate means for measuring ligament strains across a broad spectrum of applied deformations. The technique has application to most biological tissue characterization applications.

Keywords

Nickel Mold Expense Hull Sine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bach, J.M., M.L. Hull, and H.A. Patterson, Direct measurement of strain in the posterolateral bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech, 1997. 30(3): p. 281–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chazal, J., et al., Biomechanical properties of spinal ligaments and a histological study of the supraspinal ligament in traction. J Biomech, 1985. 18(3): p. 167–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nienhaus, U., T. Aegerter-Wilmsen, and C.M. Aegerter, Determination of Mechanical Stress Distribution in Drosophila Wing Discs Using Photoelasticity. Mech Dev, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heller, W. and H. Oppenheimer, Comparative studies on photoelasticity of elastomers and plastomers. J Colloid Sci, 1948. 3(1): p. 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ainola, L. and H. Aben, Fringe patterns in integrated photoelasticity. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis, 2009. 26(7): p. 1714–20.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosso, V., et al., Simultaneous strain and coherent imaging using coupled photorefractive holography and shearography through scattering media. J Biomed Opt, 2008. 13(4): p. 044010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matsumoto, T., T. Watanabe, and A. Kojima, Deformation analysis of the human femur by holographic interferometry. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2007. 2007: p. 4699–701.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De la Torre-Ibarra, M., et al., Detection of surface strain by three-dimensional digital holography. Appl Opt, 2005. 44(1): p. 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, L., et al., A quality-guided displacement tracking algorithm for ultrasonic elasticity imaging. Med Image Anal, 2009. 13(2): p. 286–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rao, M. and T. Varghese, Correlation analysis of three-dimensional strain imaging using ultrasound two-dimensional array transducers. J Acoust Soc Am, 2008. 124(3): p. 1858–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsubai, M., et al., Development of an ultrasound system for measuring tissue strain of lymphedema. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2008. 2008: p. 5294–7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sato, K., et al., Measurement of local strain on cell membrane at initiation point of calcium signaling response to applied mechanical stimulus in osteoblastic cells. J Biomech, 2007. 40(6): p. 1246–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nicolella, D.P., et al., Machine vision photogrammetry: a technique for measurement of microstructural strain in cortical bone. J Biomech, 2001. 34(1): p. 135–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCulloch, A.D. and J.H. Omens, Non-homogeneous analysis of three-dimensional transmural finite deformation in canine ventricular myocardium. J Biomech, 1991. 24(7): p. 539–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lujan, T.J., et al., Simultaneous measurement of three-dimensional joint kinematics and ligament strains with optical methods. J Biomech Eng, 2005. 127(1): p. 193–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bokobza, L., Multiwall carbon nanotube elastomeric composites: A review. Polymer, 2007. 48: p. 4907–4920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhou, J.F., et al., Percolation transition and hydrostatic piezoresistance for carbon black filled poly(methylvinylsilioxane) vulcanizates. Carbon, 2008. 46: p. 679–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yamaguchi, K., J.J.C. Busfield, and A.G. Thomas, Electrical and mechanical behavior of filled elastomers. I. The effect of strain. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 2003. 41(17): p. 2079–2089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johnson, O.K., et al. Extreme piezoresistivity of silicone/nickel nanocomposite for high resolution large strain measurement. in TMS 2010. 2010. Seattle.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bloor, D., et al., Metal-Polymer Composite with Nanostructured Filler Particles and Amplified Physical Properties. Appl Phys Lett, 2006. 88: p. 102–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peratech Limited: http://www.peratech.com/. Quantum Tunneling Composites]. Available from: http://www.peratech.com/.
  22. 22.
    Palmer, J. (9 Feb 2010) Quantum trick for pressure-sensitive mobile devices. BBC News, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8504373.stm.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tommy Hyatt
    • 1
  • David Fullwood
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rachel Bradshaw
    • 1
  • Anton Bowden
    • 1
  • Oliver Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.Brigham Young UniversityProvoUSA
  2. 2.Brigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations